ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Life Say Goodbye to Twinkies and Wonderbread (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=266679)

petegz28 11-16-2012 08:10 AM

Say Goodbye to Twinkies and Wonderbread
 
Sad to see this happen...

Twinkies Maker Hostess Going Out of Business
http://www.nbcdfw.com/news/national-...179643161.html

BigMeatballDave 11-16-2012 08:14 AM

So these people would rather strike than have a job?

Go Unions!

BIG_DADDY 11-16-2012 08:18 AM

Awesome. What better way to pay back unions. You don't have a job, now go **** yourself.

BigCatDaddy 11-16-2012 08:19 AM

Cut off nose to spite the face.

Buehler445 11-16-2012 08:19 AM

Shutting down the Emporia plant. The Emporia gazette said there were 400 people working there. Pretty tough for the town. In the last decade or so the town of 30,000 ish has lost Modine, IBP and Dolly Madison.

I think they picked up another dog food plant, but that town has to be hurting.

okoye35chiefs 11-16-2012 08:20 AM

:rolleyes:

what!? no bailout?

petegz28 11-16-2012 08:21 AM

http://media.kansascity.com/smedia/2...C5it.St.81.jpg

He should change his sign from "On Strike" to "Out of Work"

Dartgod 11-16-2012 08:22 AM

I feel some for those people, but how stupid is it to strike for better pay and then put the company out of business in the process?

mikey23545 11-16-2012 08:22 AM

Michelle hated twinkies and cupcakes anyway!

Amnorix 11-16-2012 08:25 AM

I'm pretty confident those well known products and product names will be bought out of bankruptcy by another bakery company and marketed and sold by them. Doubt you've seen your last Twinkie.

bevischief 11-16-2012 08:26 AM

Glad I haven't eaten anything they make in about 10 years, not going to miss a thing.

Chief Gump 11-16-2012 08:26 AM

The kick off to the official zombie apocalypse...

http://i752.photobucket.com/albums/x...e646a3f1-1.jpg

Dave Lane 11-16-2012 08:27 AM

Well this is headed straight to DC. And I think the unions had little to do with this. Peoples eating habits have gotten better and spelled doom for Hostess. The lack of wage concessions was a bandaid at best.

Like TJ Cinnamons another bad to eat product has gone by the wayside.

Graystoke 11-16-2012 08:27 AM

Looks like the parasite killed the host....ess

BigMeatballDave 11-16-2012 08:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amnorix (Post 9122720)
I'm pretty confident those well known products and product names will be bought out of bankruptcy by another bakery company and marketed and sold by them. Doubt you've seen your last Twinkie.

This, most likely.

Buehler445 11-16-2012 08:28 AM

There's already a thread in the DC. Put all the crap in there.

loochy 11-16-2012 08:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amnorix (Post 9122720)
I'm pretty confident those well known products and product names will be bought out of bankruptcy by another bakery company and marketed and sold by them. Doubt you've seen your last Twinkie.

This. The name and tradition is too valuable...I think.

However, I can't remember the last time I had a Twinkie or any Hostess snack though...and they don't sell Wonder bread here.

petegz28 11-16-2012 08:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave Lane (Post 9122726)
Well this is headed straight to DC. And I think the unions had little to do with this. Peoples eating habits have gotten better and spelled doom for Hostess. The lack of wage concessions was a bandaid at best.

Like TJ Cinnamons another bad to eat product has gone by the wayside.

In 'merica? The most obese nation in the world???

Mr. Flopnuts 11-16-2012 08:29 AM

JFC. They didn't strike for MORE money. They were asked to take dramatic cuts because the company couldn't survive on it's current models. Like it or don't, try not to let your poolitical biases get in the way of facts. The election's over kids...

DaFace 11-16-2012 08:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buehler445 (Post 9122698)
Shutting down the Emporia plant. The Emporia gazette said there were 400 people working there. Pretty tough for the town. In the last decade or so the town of 30,000 ish has lost Modine, IBP and Dolly Madison.

I think they picked up another dog food plant, but that town has to be hurting.

I wondered about that as soon as I read the title. That's too bad. That's a lot of industry shut down in E-town in only a few years.

BigMeatballDave 11-16-2012 08:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave Lane (Post 9122726)
Well this is headed straight to DC. And I think the unions had little to do with this. Peoples eating habits have gotten better and spelled doom for Hostess. The lack of wage concessions was a bandaid at best.

Like TJ Cinnamons another bad to eat product has gone by the wayside.

Tj Cinnamon? Who?

Buehler445 11-16-2012 08:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by loochy (Post 9122731)
This. The name and tradition is too valuable...I think.

I can't remember the last time I had a Twinkie or any Hostess snack though...and they don't sell Wonder bread here.

Won't matter for our economy if it is a European company that buys the name and makes them in China.

petegz28 11-16-2012 08:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Flopnuts (Post 9122733)
JFC. They didn't strike for MORE money. They were asked to take dramatic cuts because the company couldn't survive on it's current models. Like it or don't, try not to let your poolitical biases get in the way of facts. The election's over kids...

You know, there was a time at Sprint that everyone was willing to take paycuts to keep their job. Priorities I guess.

Hoover 11-16-2012 08:33 AM

Twinkies are not a political issue.

DaFace 11-16-2012 08:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Flopnuts (Post 9122733)
JFC. They didn't strike for MORE money. They were asked to take dramatic cuts because the company couldn't survive on it's current models. Like it or don't, try not to let your poolitical biases get in the way of facts. The election's over kids...

Though true, it doesn't change the fact that they had a choice between taking the paycuts and losing their jobs. I guess I don't understand the situation well enough to know why losing your job would be the preferable option these days.

BigMeatballDave 11-16-2012 08:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Flopnuts (Post 9122733)
JFC. They didn't strike for MORE money. They were asked to take dramatic cuts because the company couldn't survive on it's current models. Like it or don't, try not to let your poolitical biases get in the way of facts. The election's over kids...

Well, sometimes you have to ask yourself as an eemployee, do I take a pay cut or lose my job?

Unions have worn out their usefulness.

Graystoke 11-16-2012 08:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hoover (Post 9122745)
Twinkies are not a political issue.

^This^

We have a Hostess Plant here in Waterloo. I will miss the smell of baking bread in the morning.

loochy 11-16-2012 08:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Flopnuts (Post 9122733)
JFC. They didn't strike for MORE money. They were asked to take dramatic cuts because the company couldn't survive on it's current models. Like it or don't, try not to let your poolitical biases get in the way of facts. The election's over kids...

I'd rather have 8% less of something than nothing at all. If they were so unhappy, just take the pay cut and earn SOMETHING while you search for employment elsewhere.

The principle is still the same.

Predarat 11-16-2012 08:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikey23545 (Post 9122718)
Michelle hated twinkies and cupcakes anyway!

Exactly!

Fat Elvis 11-16-2012 08:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BIG_DADDY (Post 9122694)
Awesome. What better way to pay back unions. You don't have a job, now go **** yourself.

Hooray for private equity firms who bought the company, loaded it up with debt and told the workers that they weren't going to honor their contract.

What kind of cuts were the workers talking about?

Quote:

"But if I have to take the cuts they're talking about I can get more from unemployment."

http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2...hostess-brands

So let me get this straight...a private equity firm comes in and tells workers that if they want to keep working they have to make less money than they would get if they didn't work at all? And now somehow the people in a union saying, "screw that" are the bad guys?

Awesome. What better way to pay back Republican Zomnies. Your tax dollars are paying for their unemployment because you can't do math, now go **** yourself.

Deberg_1990 11-16-2012 08:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave Lane (Post 9122726)
Peoples eating habits have gotten better and spelled doom for Hostess.

Not really....If anything, theres alot more competition with sweets now. More than ever.

Fat Elvis 11-16-2012 08:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaFace (Post 9122746)
Though true, it doesn't change the fact that they had a choice between taking the paycuts and losing their jobs. I guess I don't understand the situation well enough to know why losing your job would be the preferable option these days.

Because coupled with previous concessions, workers at the Hostess plants can make more money from unemployment than they could under the new proposal.

BigMeatballDave 11-16-2012 08:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fat Elvis (Post 9122773)
Because coupled with previous concessions, workers at the Hostess plants can make more money from unemployment than they could under the new proposal.

Link?

jspchief 11-16-2012 08:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fat Elvis (Post 9122773)
Because coupled with previous concessions, workers at the Hostess plants can make more money from unemployment than they could under the new proposal.

That's a little misleading. They may take home more with unemployment, but taxes and social security aren't withheld. Come April, they will owe taxes on all that unemployment money.

And then there's the issue of unemployment being a finite benefit.

dirk digler 11-16-2012 08:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fat Elvis (Post 9122773)
Because coupled with previous concessions, workers at the Hostess plants can make more money from unemployment than they could under the new proposal.

What kind of pay cuts are they looking at? In the article you posted the one guy quoted was making $17 which is about $35,000\yr

Fat Elvis 11-16-2012 08:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave (Post 9122782)
Link?

They are claiming that in the Chicago Tribune....

BigMeatballDave 11-16-2012 08:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave (Post 9122782)
Link?

LOL nevermind

Fat Elvis 11-16-2012 08:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jspchief (Post 9122784)
That's a little misleading. They may take home more with unemployment, but taxes and social security aren't withheld. Come April, they will owe taxes on all that unemployment money.

And then there's the issue of unemployment being a finite benefit.

I think they are probably assuming that once Hostess re-emerges out of bankruptcy under new ownership, many of the workers will probably be hired back. I dunno, that's my guess anyway....

Fat Elvis 11-16-2012 08:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 9122787)
What kind of pay cuts are they looking at? In the article you posted the one guy quoted was making $17 which is about $35,000\yr

I think it would be interesting to see what kind of concessions the unions had already made in the past. Right now, I think they are looking at an 8% cut.

jspchief 11-16-2012 08:56 AM

Unemployment benefits typically pay about 66% of the average of your gross income over the previous X number of weeks. Your take home pay from a job is probably in the neighborhood of 75% of gross.

Take an 8% pay cut, and your take home pay may come close to that 66% unemployment benefit.

But like I said, taxes are not withheld from unemployment, but they are still owed on it. Short term you may be bringing home more collecting unemployment. Long term you won't. And it will run out.

BigCatDaddy 11-16-2012 08:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 9122787)
What kind of pay cuts are they looking at? In the article you posted the one guy quoted was making $17 which is about $35,000\yr

It said 8% so he would have went to $32,200.

notorious 11-16-2012 08:56 AM

****, this thread is going to draw the DC scum into the lounge.

BigMeatballDave 11-16-2012 08:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jspchief (Post 9122784)
That's a little misleading. They may take home more with unemployment, but taxes and social security aren't withheld. Come April, they will owe taxes on all that unemployment money.

And then there's the issue of unemployment being a finite benefit.

You have the option to have federal taxes withheld on unemployment benefits.

jspchief 11-16-2012 08:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fat Elvis (Post 9122793)
I think they are probably assuming that once Hostess re-emerges out of bankruptcy under new ownership, many of the workers will probably be hired back. I dunno, that's my guess anyway....

Quite possibly. But if they think they will be hired back at their previous wage, they are likely fooling themselves.

jspchief 11-16-2012 08:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave (Post 9122804)
You have the option to have federal taxes withheld on unemployment benefits.

That's (somewhat) new. Wasn't the case back when I was on unemployment.

BigMeatballDave 11-16-2012 09:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jspchief (Post 9122808)
That's (somewhat) new. Wasn't the case back when I was on unemployment.

I had that option in 09.

10% federal tax

dirk digler 11-16-2012 09:01 AM

Alright I am on the union side now if this true.

Quote:

They watched as the company illegally withdrew from all Taft-Hartley pension plans, saving more than $50 million in the first five months. The BCTGM learned that the then Hostess CEO was to be awarded a 300% raise, and at least nine other top executives were to receive raises ranging between 35% and 80%.

Since the company ceased making contractually obligated payments to the Hostess workers' pensions in July 2011, it has pocketed approximately $160 million – money earned by and owed to its dedicated workforce.



themanwithnoname 11-16-2012 09:06 AM

I'm not a big fan of unions, but that's not what did this. Looks like Fat Elvis and Mr. Flopnuts have brought some sense to the argument though.

I'm also totally shocked that so many people on here don't understand unemployment either. :rolleyes:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave Lane (Post 9122726)
Well this is headed straight to DC. And I think the unions had little to do with this. Peoples eating habits have gotten better and spelled doom for Hostess. The lack of wage concessions was a bandaid at best.

Like TJ Cinnamons another bad to eat product has gone by the wayside.

You're ****ing kidding, right?

petegz28 11-16-2012 09:12 AM

I don't give a shit why it happened. I don't want Twinkies going away!!!

Brock 11-16-2012 09:15 AM

Probably want to go ahead and get used to this happening. Downward pressure on american wages will continue until we're India.

A Salt Weapon 11-16-2012 09:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Graystoke (Post 9122727)
Looks like the parasite killed the host....ess

Well said.
Posted via Mobile Device

Fat Elvis 11-16-2012 09:17 AM

Here are the teamsters talking about the contract...(teamsters accepted contract, bakers didn't).

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/3CsAkqZGvis?rel=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

ChiefRocka 11-16-2012 09:22 AM

http://media.northjersey.com/images/christie6.jpg

(what have I done)

Fat Elvis 11-16-2012 09:23 AM

Quote:

The contract calls for extreme wage and benefit cuts which amount to 27- 32% overall, with an 8% wage reduction imposed immediately. The company unilaterally ceased making contributions, required by their union contracts, to the workers' pensions in July 2011. Hostess has also imposed draconian cuts in health benefits and eliminated the eight-hour workday.

Read more here: http://www.sacbee.com/2012/11/09/497...#storylink=cpy
The CEO was seeking a $1M pay increase while asking for these concessions.

jspchief 11-16-2012 09:29 AM

I'm sure the teamsters side of the story is accurate...

HonestChieffan 11-16-2012 09:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fat Elvis (Post 9122863)
The CEO was seeking a $1M pay increase while asking for these concessions.

From your link....

This section contains unedited press releases distributed by PR Newswire. These releases reflect the views of the issuing entity and are not reviewed or edited by the Sacramento Bee staff. More information on PR Newswire can be found on their web site. You can contact the service with questions or concerns here.

Click here for the free Sacbee iPhone App!

Read more here: http://www.sacbee.com/2012/11/09/497...#storylink=cpy

jiveturkey 11-16-2012 09:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28 (Post 9122835)
I don't give a shit why it happened. I don't want Twinkies going away!!!

You probably should have been buying trucks loads of them then. They've been in a downward spiral for years now.

BlackHelicopters 11-16-2012 09:41 AM

Hostess didn't build that.

dirk digler 11-16-2012 09:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jspchief (Post 9122869)
I'm sure the teamsters side of the story is accurate...

It is but this whole thing is complicated and everyone is to blame. Teamsters did take major concessions 3 years ago and they lost thousands of jobs and yet they turned around and took more concessions this time. The other union isn't willing.

Here is a good story about it...

http://management.fortune.cnn.com/20...kies-bankrupt/

Fat Elvis 11-16-2012 09:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HonestChieffan (Post 9122904)
From your link....

This section contains unedited press releases distributed by PR Newswire. These releases reflect the views of the issuing entity and are not reviewed or edited by the Sacramento Bee staff. More information on PR Newswire can be found on their web site. You can contact the service with questions or concerns here.

Click here for the free Sacbee iPhone App!

Read more here: http://www.sacbee.com/2012/11/09/497...#storylink=cpy

No, the $1M pay increase is from the video I posted....

Mr. Laz 11-16-2012 09:48 AM

wow ... just said '**** it' and closed it down.


Not that i can blame him

rabblerouser 11-16-2012 09:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laz (Post 9122942)
wow ... just said '**** it' and closed it down.


Not that i can blame him

It's going to start happening to a lot of companies.

It's the George Soros 'European Model' - part of government consolidation.

It's okay...the government will soon issue replacements.

okoye35chiefs 11-16-2012 09:54 AM

a ton of fortune 500 companies have ceased pensions... I know mine has

Predarat 11-16-2012 10:10 AM

This is a solid draw for Michelle Obama (Hates sweets, loves unions) and a flawless vitory for Mayor bumberg in New York.

Omaha 11-16-2012 10:15 AM

I want to believe that they were "overcapacity" because demand for that crap is dying, but I don't think that's the case.

Radar Chief 11-16-2012 10:17 AM

NNNNOOOOOOOO!!!!1! /Tallahasee

Fire Me Boy! 11-16-2012 10:17 AM

Twinkies are gross. Little Debbie Swiss Rolls FTMFW!

Buehler445 11-16-2012 10:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 9122921)
It is but this whole thing is complicated and everyone is to blame. Teamsters did take major concessions 3 years ago and they lost thousands of jobs and yet they turned around and took more concessions this time. The other union isn't willing.

Here is a good story about it...

http://management.fortune.cnn.com/20...kies-bankrupt/

Yeah, the whole ****ing thing is a disaster, but hopefully it will lead to some real changes in collective bargaining.

Omaha 11-16-2012 10:19 AM

What person over the age of 12 wants to eat that shit, anyway? Have just a little bit of respect for yourself. That shit is nasty.

eazyb81 11-16-2012 10:20 AM

This is a prime example why the new "normal" unemployment rate is going to be 6-7%, not the 3-4% that we have previously been used to. Low-income workers are going to be more content to just say fuck it and take unemployment for years on end instead of taking less to keep an undesirable job.

Our welfare system essentially incentivizes this attitude, and US taxpayers will pay for it.

notorious 11-16-2012 10:22 AM

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/pzaQjS1JstY" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

eazyb81 11-16-2012 10:40 AM

Great article from Fortune on the Hostess saga.

http://management.fortune.cnn.com/20...kies-bankrupt/

ModSocks 11-16-2012 10:43 AM

This is terrible timing.

States are beginning to legalize recreational marijuana and now Hostess is going out of business?

Frito Lay stocks just went up.

loochy 11-16-2012 10:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Omaha (Post 9123042)
What person over the age of 12 wants to eat that shit, anyway? Have just a little bit of respect for yourself. That shit is nasty.

http://images.sodahead.com/polls/002...fu_xlarge.jpeg

BigMeatballDave 11-16-2012 10:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eazyb81 (Post 9123047)
This is a prime example why the new "normal" unemployment rate is going to be 6-7%, not the 3-4% that we have previously been used to. Low-income workers are going to be more content to just say fuck it and take unemployment for years on end instead of taking less to keep an undesirable job.

Our welfare system essentially incentivizes this attitude, and US taxpayers will pay for it.

Federal Emergency Unemployment Compensation Benefits expires next month. Depending on the state, people are only going to get like 6 months of benefits.

Chief Pote 11-16-2012 10:53 AM

Very nice. Is anyone going to eat that twinkie that's soon to be made in China?

ChiefRocka 11-16-2012 10:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefPote (Post 9123127)
Very nice. Is anyone going to eat that twinkie that's soon to be made in China?

They're too busy mining Helium-3 on the dark side of the moon.

Radar Chief 11-16-2012 10:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefPote (Post 9123127)
Very nice. Is anyone going to eat that twinkie that's soon to be made in China?

Depends on the lead content.

gblowfish 11-16-2012 10:58 AM

Last night I bought a box of Ho Ho's as a final act of desperation.

Omaha 11-16-2012 11:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by loochy (Post 9123104)

What? What's wrong with what I posted?


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:21 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.