Quote:
Damit Clark! You want to be like Pittsburgh then set the tone. Build a badass attacking D and never let the well run dry on talent. Keep it stocked. Also acquire a franchise QB. It's going to be hard to do if everytime we hire a new HC we change the damn defensive scheme. |
Interesting.
As I said in the other thread, I am all for Reid's decisions until he ****s them up and right now he is batting 0 for 0. Crazy that they wasted Dorsey's whole first contract trying to fit a square peg in a round hole, now after it is over, the round hole would be there. TJ is finally starting to play like a draftable talent, albeit not 3rd overall. He would not fit in the 4-3, correct? |
He would fit, but they aren't paying him that bonus or the base salary next year.
|
Quote:
I guess we'll see. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
USC defensive players drafted by year: 2009 - 8 2010 - 3 2011 - 3 2012 - 1 |
Quote:
Gawd I hate teh lawyers... |
Quote:
Quote:
|
I initially hated the idea of kiffin but it's growing on me.
Didn't realize he runs the under. It's not Tampa 2. It's a very aggressive defense. It's what Seattle runs. Best news is it would be an easy transition. It's basically a 4-3 that uses 3-4 personnel. Now.. This isn't his baby. Kiffin adapted to this defense and struggled with it at USC. But I love the scheme for kc. |
Quote:
Powe/Poe and Dorsey (if resigned) could handle DT in a rotation. I don't like Hali as a 4-3 OLB and he's not strong enough to play the end... |
Any DC that can work with our talent and exploit what we have....that's what I'm for. Schemes generally don't excite me. Having said that, I'd prefer a coach that can employ a 34-43 hybrid that's super-aggressive.
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Told you guys this was coming. All signs were pointing to the 4-3 under which the likes of Kiffin, Jauron and Seattle runs.
It is actually a defense that s similar to the 3-4. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:27 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.