Is it ok to veto a trade when one side gets a lot more value?
 

Team A gets:
Antonio Gates
Vincent Jackson
Michael Bush

Team B gets:
Jared Cook
Anquan Boldin
Pierre Thomas

Trade got veto'd in our league and the guy from Team A is bitching.

It's one sided, but not enough to warrant an over turn IMO

I would've vetoed it. And I can see why Team A is bitching. He's flat out raping the other guy in terms of value. Tell the Team B guy to stop playing FF, because he doesn't have a clue what he's doing.

Buck, you are team B.

Don't do it again.

Unless you know they are cheating, never veto

I'd bitch too, but I am a mal content.

B is a dumbass.

Here's the deal.

A has been in the league since the beginning (I think we are at 7 years this year). We needed a couple new guys this year, so A invited his best friend, B into the league.

A is 2-2 with a pretty decent roster, and B is 0-4 and he actually has just had really bad luck. B has been posting on the message board that he sucks and he's giving up.

Now A is swearing that he would never **** over his best friend, B, in a trade, but that's either what he's doing, or it's collusion.

A is throwing a ****ing hissy fit online right now.

Yeah, then I'd veto. If he's admitted he's giving up, he's greasing the friend's palms.

Team B is not getting an upgrade at any of the three positions. Looks pretty fishy to me.

This. That's obvious ****ing collusion.