Alex Smith did, does, and will always suck. (part 2)
http://uranus.ckt.net/~gochiefs/alexcassel.gif
http://i.imgur.com/MwBEnUp.jpg Old thread is archived here. |
If this team is one and done in the playoffs it won't be because of Alex Smith. It will be because of our defense. Giving up 30 points to Oakland is a problem. Our offense shouldn't have to score 50+ points to seal a victory. The amount of points we've been giving up lately is rediculous. We aren't going to get very far in the playoffs if we don't figure out how to stop someone.
|
If this team is one and done in the playoffs it won't be because of Alex Smith. It will be because of our defense. Giving up 30 points to Oakland is a problem. Our offense shouldn't have to score 50+ points to seal a victory. The amount of points we've been giving up lately is rediculous. We aren't going to get very far in the playoffs if we don't figure out how to stop someone.
|
Quote:
I'm pretty sure this is the exact type of post OTWP was referring to when he said people were already preparing their Alexcuses for a playoff loss instead of letting it play out so for those asking for an example I give you exhibit A. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
once? damn dude, did you graduate from HS?? |
I think a lot has to do with our negativity due to previous disasters in the playoffs. Hopefully the team can change pessimistic fans into optimistic fans.
|
Quote:
|
I missed most of Sunday's game and didn't DVR it, so I missed the Jamaal Charles show. Christmas pageants and family stuff. :banghead:
It does appear Mizzou DC Dave Steckel ran the gameplan for the Raiders on Sunday, based on their hilarious inability to stop screen passes. That said, it definitely sounds like a positive sign and something to build on for Alex Smith. Hopefully the momentum will continue in that direction (it basically has taken me back to where I was after the Giants game - hopefully optimistic and close to being convinced). Still not 100 percent sold but getting closer. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
**** it...let's win the whole damn thing. Top 5 PIG on offense and defense says we should fear no one.
|
Quote:
http://uranus.ckt.net/~gochiefs/truestfans.gif |
Quote:
|
Quote:
The Chiefs could win a playoff game and it could not prove anything positive about Alex Smith (< 250 yards passing, poor 3rd down conversions, lackluster offensive performance would do it). The Chiefs could also lose a playoff game and have it prove a lot about Smith a lot of positive things about Smith (If he plays at a high level but they lose due to D/Special Teams). |
You guys who disliked the acquisition of Smith from the start - if he won a playoff game this year, would you be fine with going forward with him as a "franchise QB"?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
He has been damn impressive since the bye.
|
Quote:
That is a thread killer!!!!!! |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Questions: 1) Who did they beat? 2) How did they beat them? 3) What did the offense do? 4) What did Alex Smith do within the offense (i.e. was it efficient/consistently moving the ball against a good playoff defense? Did the offense perform better/worse against that defense than expected?) 5) What happened in the next game (i.e. did the Chiefs compete against an elite team and lose, or did the Chiefs get outclassed by an elite team? Did the offense hold up its end of the bargain?) A Chiefs playoff win could confirm skeptics fears about Alex Smith. A Chiefs playoff loss could banish skeptics fears about Alex Smith. Lot of factors there, IMO. Alex Smith's ability to win a lot of games in the regular season when paired with a great D and strong running game has never been seriously questioned (his two years in San Francisco proved that, at least). It's his ability to win games against elite teams that can put up points on his defense that has been called into question. Chiefs would need to make a pretty big playoff run (at least to AFC Championship, and doing it on the back of Alex Smith) for me to be OK with committing to a long-term extension for Smith at a franchise QB price tag. Outside of that, the only extension/commitment to Smith should be along the lines discussed in the Alex Smith extension thread. Something of reasonable cost and that can be walked away from in a few years without destroying the cap. (And even then, I'd say wait until after the draft and FA period to work that out). |
Only if he can throw an additional 4 TDs and just 1 more INT in the last two two games and become an alternate in the Pro Bowl.
Just kidding, even then he won't fit my definition of a franchise QB. Smith is having a career year and he still can't crack 300 yards in a game and still loses the overwhelming majority of the games where the opposition scores more than 24. Smith is a middle of the pack guy (even in his best years) and will never be counted among the greats. He is not a franchise QB. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
With Alex, you should know what you are getting. It's the same simple equation it has been over the last 3 years. If everyone else just does a DECENT job, Alex will do his... and that means KC will win. Look at the 3 losses... - Denver racks up over 100 yds on the ground.. over 300 yds in the air... and Sherman fumbled... losing the ball to Denver as we were in the RZ fixing to score. Our offense put up 344 yards this game. - SD racks up over 100 yds on the ground... nearly 500 yds in the air... was 50% on 3rd/4th down conversions... Our offense put up nearly 400 yds this game, and took back a 4 point lead with only 1:22 left in the 4th. - Denver racks up 132 yds on the ground... over 400 yds in the air... was over 50% on 3rd down conversions... Our offense put up 452 yds this game, and scored a 4th Q TD to get us within 7... but ultimately couldn't score on the final drive with 3 minutes left. We lost the 3 games for a variety of reasons and shared blame... but c'mon... mostly our defense just shit themselves. If we lose in the playoffs... I think it's fair to predict that it will be primarily due to our D not forcing a reasonable amount of punts. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Look Jamal Charles might be the best player in the league, but if he loses two fumbles and the Chiefs lose than likely it's on him. Let's wait for the game to play out before deciding who lost it. LMAO People are already digging in on this debate. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
http://i651.photobucket.com/albums/u...___by_auge.gif |
Quote:
I really don't see any offense in the playoffs likely to carve up the defense outside of the Donks. I really don't fear the Pats offense all that much with Gronk out. I think the Raiders game was just them losing focus and intensity after being up by so much. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
ya, let's have doubts, considering that last two decades are so freeeeeeeaking great, and a new QB gets us to the playoffs with three games left. ya, we deserve the SB THIS year. |
Quote:
Alex Smith "defenders" are looking to paint Alex Smith "haters" into a corner. "What if Alex wins a playoff game?" He could win the game throwing for under 100 yards and no TD's. "What if the defense gives up 30 points?" How did that happen? Did Alex throw a few INT's deep in our own end? Did the opponent score on Special Teams? People are looking for comments so that when he "wins" a playoff game, they can break out the "gotcha" moments, and nothing more. BUT YOU SAID YOU'D BE FINE WITH HIM IF HE WON A PLAYOFF GAME!!!!! It's obviously transparent, so why bother? |
Quote:
Just admit you'll never like the guy and leave it at that. This is all so petty and ****ing ridiculous. |
History repeating itself.
2009-2011: When the "Jets QB" is mentioned, 95% of the time, it's not by the guys that wanted to draft him. 2013: When the "Jets QB" is mentioned, 95% of the time, it's not by the guys that wanted to draft him. God, give it a ****ing rest. If your only argument is to bring up GS, maybe you should sit this one out until you can formulate a real argument? |
Saints also put up big points on his defense and he lead 2 4th quarter drives. I know, I know it's the Saints since we have to meet a certain playoff win criteria.
|
Quote:
Maybe they should watch this, because right now they seem about as clued in- plus it's ****ing hilarious! (No option to embed this video- ya gotta click on the link at the bottom. ) http://img.tapatalk.com/d/13/12/17/buhu9uhy.jpg http://screen.yahoo.com/daily-affirm...000000862.html |
Quote:
|
Quote:
The act of "SB or bust" gets old when this team hasn't won a playoff game in forever. I know omg, omg, he's actually going to be happy if we win a sole playoff game? Yes, I am. I'm enjoying watching football after basically 15 years of shit with 2 good seasons sprinkled in. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Yet every time one of them even had a halfway decent game the shoe was on the other foot. |
He's headed for 27-7 ROFL
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Truth, it's a team game. As much as JC went off on Oakland, if guys were not doing there part, JC would not of had 5TD's and all of those yards. At the same time, AS was not responsible for all the points scored the last 5 games, he was a part of it, just as the other players on the team doing their part. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I assume Cochise's question about "going forward with him as a franchise QB" includes an extension and commitment to Alex Smith that pays him like an elite QB. That whole post was about what it would take to jump on board with that type of extension. |
If you ever said any negative about Alex ever and are now trying to say you "are surprised about how well he's playing", or something along those lines, gfy.
You are the very definition of a bandwagon wuss fan. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
We just had the best game ever against the arm pit of the NFL
If only we had a QB to suck on JFC! |
Quote:
With that said, there's also nothing wrong with people wanting to see how that game plays out. I'm not sure why it's a problem, considering the flip side - where people used the first 9 games as some sort of, "yeah, told you so" when anyone with a set of eyes knows he played average ball at best and rode the defense to 9 wins. There are a ton of reasons this debate will likely never end: -Many of the people involved aren't even arguing the topic anymore, they are just arguing the poster themselves. -Many are absolute extremists who refuse to consider any middle ground. -The Niner trolls continue to stir the pot. -There are plenty of jackasses who can't formulate a coherent argument on their own, so they resort to bringing up Geno Smith. -Some can't even stick to their original argument, and want to have it both ways. Example: First 9 weeks - "He's 9-0! All he does is win!" When pointed out that the defense/ST did the majority of the heavy lifting, the boilerplate response? "It's a team game." Fast-forward to present day. We're 2-3 over the last 5 games. Apparently, it's not a "team game" anymore. Nothing is going to change here, which is why I've stayed out of the conversation for the most part, along with the fact that AS has played well the last couple of weeks. Let's hope we continue to see "Charger Game Alex" and not "First 9 Weeks" Alex. |
Quote:
What then? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I think he'll be paid for what he is. A good to very good QB. He'll get around 10-13 million a season if his play continues to point up. Something like a 3 year, 39 million dollar extension. I don't see Dorsey giving him elite level money. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Sanchez went to two AFCCG's, doing almost exactly what Alex has done for most of this season - ride his defense. Double standard. Geno? He's a rookie QB, FFS. This place goes out of it's way to absolutely shit on young QB's, while defending the Thigpens, Cassels and Smiths of the NFL. It's a ****ing joke. He may not end up being worth a shit, but writing off a QB 15 games into his career is laughable. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
It's been said multiple times before but this fan base wouldn't know what the **** to do with a rookie QB. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Being a fan of multiple teams is creepy as ****.
|
Quote:
At this point, I'd still think they can wait until after the draft and FA periods are complete before extending Smith. But that's not a major quibble or sticking point. I also would have no problem with paying him like a franchise QB if he proves he is one over the rest of this season and through the playoffs. Would be pretty happy about that, to be honest. What I hoped for is winning out over what I thought would happen, which is nice (and a welcome change, at least as far as the Chiefs go). Been a damn roller coaster ride, though... up over the first quarter of the season, down over the second, back up over the last half of the third quarter... hope we're done with the descents now. |
Quote:
Oh, my first team lost. What did my second team do? Damn. What about this team that has that one player I really like? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
What a crock of bullshit. It's been nothing but, "well, Alex did enough to win, not his fault the defense gave up X, Y and Z" from the folks that screamed "TEAM GAME" when he was riding that same defense to a 9-0 start. |
There's just too many factors and moving parts in a football game to use wins and losses to justify a single players worth.
Players do obviously contribute to wins an losses, but to put "blame" or "praise" on a guy is pretty insufficient in most cases. There are exceptions, but for the most part, wins as losses are team stats. It's why I hate the way cowboys fans bash romo. He's carried a shit roster and put them in position for all those "chokes" that seem to always be on him. In reality, it's just not that simple. |
He has played some of the best ball of his career the last 4 weeks and the team is only 2-2, so you are right. 9-0 and was kind of meh.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:26 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.