Originally Posted by Hoover (Post 9362846)

So you're telling me that I should be looking at NSFW spoilers because my tech people think I'm looking at it anyway?

Well OK Then...

Originally Posted by Hoover (Post 9362846)

So you're telling me that I should be looking at NSFW spoilers because my tech people think I'm looking at it anyway?

Well OK Then...

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 9362824)

Is Sorter's use of the spoiler tags earlier in this thread filter evasion?

Originally Posted by Peyton's Princess (Post 9362828)

my work has free wifi so I just bring my laptop with me and surf whatever the **** I want under a fake name and keep everything on the work computer right next to me work related! Must be nice, I know =)

Originally Posted by Fire Me Boy! (Post 9362853)

Yes.

Originally Posted by Fire Me Boy! (Post 9362853)

Yes.

Originally Posted by Peyton's Princess (Post 9362828)

my work has free wifi so I just bring my laptop with me and surf whatever the **** I want under a fake name and keep everything on the work computer right next to me work related! Must be nice, I know =)

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 9362855)

Now see, I think that's just being too uptight about it.

That picture is funny. I want to see it.

I don't want to click a link to see it - I have no idea what's behind that link.

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 9362849)

Then why even say it?

I can totally understand not wanting to have pics with graphic nudity stuck in the cache of your work PC, possibly without you even knowing it.

I think we need to differentiate between things like nude pictures and pictures with the word **** in them.

That's just me.

Originally Posted by Sorter (Post 9362861)

A really sexy tattoo. :)

Originally Posted by GoWalrus (Post 9362859)

What does your boss think about that? ROFL

Originally Posted by Fire Me Boy! (Post 9362843)

****. That's one of my pet peeves, too.

:shake:

Originally Posted by Fire Me Boy! (Post 9362863)

Read the whole post. I was explaining that as far as this board's terms of service go, it doesn't matter where I'm looking at the board - at home, at work, at the library... that's why I hate the "you should work at work" argument for allowing things. Me being at work doesn't change the fact that it's against TOS.

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 9362849)

Then why even say it?

I can totally understand not wanting to have pics with graphic nudity stuck in the cache of your work PC, possibly without you even knowing it.

I think we need to differentiate between things like nude pictures and pictures with the word **** in them.

That's just me.

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 9362855)

Now see, I think that's just being too uptight about it.

That picture is funny. I want to see it.

I don't want to click a link to see it - I have no idea what's behind that link.

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 9362865)

When I click the spoiler tag, I see the pic, not a link.

Originally Posted by Fire Me Boy! (Post 9362876)

He edited it. When he originally posted it (look at my quoted version) he used the IMG tags. It just has the f-word in it, which is filter evasion.

The way he edited it 20 minutes ago is fine.

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 9362874)

I read the whole post.

You're using the TOS as a crutch to protest that you don't want indecent material loaded into your cache, potentially without your knowledge.

It's a legit complaint, don't hide behind the TOS.

Originally Posted by Fire Me Boy! (Post 9362876)

He edited it. When he originally posted it (look at my quoted version) he used the IMG tags. It just has the f-word in it, which is filter evasion.

The way he edited it 20 minutes ago is fine.

Originally Posted by KCUnited (Post 9362871)

It never bothers me, but it's a rare opportunity to catch you slippin'.

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 9362886)

Stop being such a fuddy duddy.

There is NOTHING wrong with that picture.

I get you don't want bare tits and pussies on your PC.

Originally Posted by Peyton's Princess (Post 9362884)

while we're at it, we need to kill CosmicPal's avatar. That avy makes me want to jurg it every time I see it and it is definitely NSFW

Originally Posted by PaulAllen (Post 9362883)

I can't believe you neg repped me for that first post FMB LMAO what a bitch...

Originally Posted by Fire Me Boy! (Post 9362891)

That pic doesn't bother me one bit, in all honesty. But it is filter evasion, by letter of the (Chiefsplanet) law.

Originally Posted by PaulAllen (Post 9362883)

I can't believe you neg repped me for that first post FMB LMAO what a bitch...

Originally Posted by Sorter (Post 9362894)

who is CosmicPal and what is this av you speak of?

Originally Posted by Peyton's Princess (Post 9362900)

you're a smart guy, I'm sure you can find him

Originally Posted by Fire Me Boy! (Post 9362891)

That pic doesn't bother me one bit, in all honesty. But it is filter evasion, by letter of the (Chiefsplanet) law.

Originally Posted by Peyton's Princess (Post 9362884)

while we're at it, we need to kill CosmicPal's avatar. That avy makes me want to jurg it every time I see it and it is definitely NSFW

Originally Posted by Sorter (Post 9362902)

too. lazy. to. use. search. function. argghh.

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 9362905)

You'll never be one of the cool kids.

Originally Posted by Fire Me Boy! (Post 9362907)

Originally Posted by Fire Me Boy! (Post 9362907)

Originally Posted by Peyton's Princess (Post 9362911)

the filter evasion thing is one of the biggest sham's of all time on this site.

it only gets moderated 10% of the time and in order for it to get moderated it has to be someone that isn't very well "liked", for lack of a better word

but as a person who doesn't filter evade, I don't give a flying ****!

Originally Posted by Fire Me Boy! (Post 9362907)

Originally Posted by Fire Me Boy! (Post 9362910)

Never have been one. I'm good with it.

Originally Posted by Peyton's Princess (Post 9362915)

be back in 3 minutes

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 9362925)

I was just teasing.

You can be a cool kid if you want.

I accept Paypal and Western Union.

Oh, and pickled okra. I love that shit.

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 9362826)

Once again.....you didn't pay attention....did you?

Originally Posted by KC Tattoo (Post 9362940)

I understand what OP is saying.

I don't like it or agree.


I don't think spoiler tag in the picture threads with NSFW should be a big deal to be bannworth. Just don't click on the NSFW. I'd rather not click on a link because it could be harmful to my computer or just blog it down. It does that at times.

This is a discussion so I am doing just that with my oppinion on the subject.

Maybe at work shouldn't be looking at the pictures if you got to worry about someone sneeking up behind you. At least the NSFW suggest that it isn't a good idea to look at that spoiler tag. It's on person clicking it at work own fault for getting busted.

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 9362886)

I get you don't want bare tits and pussies on your PC.

Originally Posted by KC Tattoo (Post 9362940)

I understand what OP is saying.

I don't like it or agree.


I don't think spoiler tag in the picture threads with NSFW should be a big deal to be bannworth. Just don't click on the NSFW. I'd rather not click on a link because it could be harmful to my computer or just blog it down. It does that at times.

This is a discussion so I am doing just that with my oppinion on the subject.

Maybe at work shouldn't be looking at the pictures if you got to worry about someone sneeking up behind you. At least the NSFW suggest that it isn't a good idea to look at that spoiler tag. It's on person clicking it at work own fault for getting busted.

Originally Posted by saphojunkie (Post 9362939)

Wait...


There's a porn gif thread?


:bolt:

Originally Posted by KC Tattoo (Post 9362940)

I understand what OP is saying.

I don't like it or agree.


I don't think spoiler tag in the picture threads with NSFW should be a big deal to be bannworth. Just don't click on the NSFW. I'd rather not click on a link because it could be harmful to my computer or just blog it down. It does that at times.

This is a discussion so I am doing just that with my oppinion on the subject.

Maybe at work shouldn't be looking at the pictures if you got to worry about someone sneeking up behind you. At least the NSFW suggest that it isn't a good idea to look at that spoiler tag. It's on person clicking it at work own fault for getting busted.

Originally Posted by Guru (Post 9362950)

Read it again.

Originally Posted by BigRedChief (Post 9362948)

that's damn un-American :shrug:

Originally Posted by DaFace (Post 9362761)

I'm actually interested in this discussion as well. It's come up from time to time among the mods, but I'm not sure we've even come up with a firm rule about it.

My general feeling is that NSFW images should be linked only and that the spoiler tag isn't a sufficient method of masking it, but I'm open to thinking about it differently.

Originally Posted by Fire Me Boy! (Post 9362822)

True enough. That said, a lot of IT departments will let bikini pics slide... throw in some full nudity and you've crossed a line.

Originally Posted by Fire Me Boy! (Post 9362963)

ROFL

Somethin' just ain't clicking.

Originally Posted by KC Tattoo (Post 9362991)

I get it that you don't want it being loaded into your browser's cache. I get that.

However a thread like Boobs nothing but Boobs Or Would You threads or the Ass threads or the Red head threads. These threads are fun with the NSFW spoiler tags. That is the issue I have to take away. Ask the mods to rename the threads to NSFW then.

Can the mods rename the notorious riskey' threads to NSFW then that could solve some of the issue.

Originally Posted by KC Tattoo (Post 9362991)

I get it that you don't want it being loaded into your browser's cache. I get that.

However a thread like Boobs nothing but Boobs Or Would You threads or the Ass threads or the Red head threads. These threads are fun with the NSFW spoiler tags. That is the issue I have to take away. Ask the mods to rename the threads to NSFW then.

Can the mods rename the notorious riskey' threads to NSFW then that could solve some of the issue.

Originally Posted by Mr. Laz (Post 9363006)

been there, tried that

He doesn't care that a thread is titled 'look at these BOOBS!!!!!'

This picture/spoiler thing as been bugging him for months


of course he could just stay out of the 'dirty' threads but that doesn't seem to be acceptable either.

Sheldon want those rules.

Originally Posted by Fire Me Boy! (Post 9362695)

Can we take a moment to seriously discuss posting NSFW and full nude images inside spoiler tags? I'm not talking about NSFW images in a thread clearly marked NSFW like the porn gif thread, but NSFW images popping up in threads like today's Tiffani Thiessen thread (just an example since it's fresh on my mind and is not marked NSFW).

Let's forget for a moment that posting pictures showing genitalia and nipples in general is against board policy and focus merely on the spoiler tags.

While the spoiler tags DO hide the image from view for someone walking by, they do nothing for someone whose IS folks at work peek behind the scenes. Spoiler tags only hide the image from view; the image still loads on the machine and its cache.

Am I the only person bothered by this? If I am, I'll shut up. But this is really becoming such a rampant practice, it makes me hesitant to peruse Chiefsplanet at work, even threads that should be safe to go in.

Originally Posted by Fire Me Boy! (Post 9362805)

It's a lame argument because it still applies if I simply don't want trashy pictures on my home computer cache. The fact is it's against the terms of service, and it doesn't matter where I view the thread, it's still against the TOS.

Originally Posted by lewdog (Post 9363130)

Over/Under .5


The number of Chiefs Planet posters who will lose sleep over this topic tonight?

Originally Posted by Dave Lane (Post 9363169)

Can we have a Ban Fire Me Boy thread please?

Originally Posted by Fire Me Boy! (Post 9362747)

I have no problem with properly labeled threads, and even links that are labeled NSFW. That gives me a choice to see them. But when they show up in random threads, there's where I find a problem...

:shrug:

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 9363208)

Cmon man. It's not really a random thread. It's not like someone posted it in the Geno Smith thread or anything. It was in the pictures forum in a thread about her. How many threads are there in the picture forums specifically made about a certain girl that don't contain at least one or two slightly NSFW, or totally NSFW pics?

Just don't go into the picture forum when you're at work.

Originally Posted by Fire Me Boy! (Post 9363195)

So glad you're able to look at the number of other folks - respected members even - and decide I'm out of line for simply wanting us to go one way or the other... allow it or don't.

Start a thread. If after 48 hours more people want me gone than want me to stay, I'll take a 6-month hiatus from posting.

Originally Posted by DaFace (Post 9362825)

Here's a thought, with the caveat that I DON'T KNOW IF WE CAN MAKE THIS WORK.

I found another site out there in the world that has a NSFW tag. According to the description, it doesn't load the image until after the person clicks the link. This would also make sure that it's clear that this isn't a spoiler and is truly a way of masking the image.

Is that something that those against the spoiler route would be OK with?

(Other mods feel free to chime in on this as well, either publicly or privately.)

Originally Posted by DaFace (Post 9362825)

Here's a thought, with the caveat that I DON'T KNOW IF WE CAN MAKE THIS WORK.

I found another site out there in the world that has a NSFW tag. According to the description, it doesn't load the image until after the person clicks the link. This would also make sure that it's clear that this isn't a spoiler and is truly a way of masking the image.

Is that something that those against the spoiler route would be OK with?

(Other mods feel free to chime in on this as well, either publicly or privately.)

Originally Posted by Peyton's Princess (Post 9362911)

the filter evasion thing is one of the biggest sham's of all time on this site.

it only gets moderated 10% of the time and in order for it to get moderated it has to be someone that isn't very well "liked", for lack of a better word

but as a person who doesn't filter evade, I don't give a flying ****!

Originally Posted by Phobia (Post 9363865)

That's not even remotely true. I've cracked the whip on two guys who have been here since Aug 2000 and are well-liked in the past couple weeks for getting loose with filter evasion. I fix every one I notice whether inner-circle or not. The irony is that I don't even care. While I'd rather not hang out frequently with a potty-mouth, profanity dosn't bother me. But it does bother some people and we have systems in place to keep this place mostly profanity-free.

Originally Posted by wazu (Post 9363909)

Threads about ass licking, or whatever Florida based story of the day is going on, or praising chocolate penis...I really don't feel like ever having to explain to my boss that its just an innocent Chiefs fan site.

Originally Posted by AustinChief (Post 9363902)

Not to be a dick about this... but it seems my post was ignored... there is a rule in place and unless someone convinces me otherwise... that's the rule. This really isn't something up for public debate on what people like or don't. It's a practical matter on what internet filters look at. Sorry, but I have to be pragmatic on this one. So FMB is right, actually he is being far too loose on the issue. If you want to post a pic that isn't "completely work safe" then it needs to be a link. Period. Otherwise we, as a website, risk being categorized in a way that I don't think is accurate.

Originally Posted by Dave Lane (Post 9363621)

I think its fine the way it is but if this gets **** Me Bitches panties unbunched its fine by me.

Originally Posted by Fire Me Boy! (Post 9363942)

Thanks. It sounds like this rule needs to be reiterated (maybe with a sticky explainer) and enforced then.