ChiefsPlanet - Chiefs Jaworski rates Chiefs QB at No. 20 among NFL starters

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)

- Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)

- -

Jaworski rates Chiefs QB at No. 20 among NFL starters (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=274325)

Quote:

Originally Posted by the_spatula (Post 9794803)

I would put Freeman, Bradford, and Tannehill ahead of Smith. But, it's about right.

I despise the idea of having Smith as our QB but I would LOVE to hear how those 3 are better.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Messier (Post 9794811)

That's not a plan. Just drafting a QB at one regardless of who isn't a plan.

I understand and I am not saying that is what we should do. But it is what most on here think we should do every year.

Quote:

Originally Posted by mcaj22 (Post 9794958)

yea Flaccos efficient playoff run of 11 touchdowns and no picks

pure luck

lol

So Flacco's Efficiency is good, but Smith is a Game Manger is BAD.

Got super duper logic there Dude, nice work.

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheUte (Post 9795014)

So Flacco's Efficiency is good, but Smith is a Game Manger is BAD.

Got super duper logic there Dude, nice work.

it took Flacco like 4 games to throw 11 touchdowns

it takes Alex Smith 16 games to throw 18 touchdowns

....

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Roundup (Post 9794792)

It doesn't matter who just drafting a QB in the 1st or better yet 1st overall is the only way to solve our QB problem. It doesn't matter about quality

stupid post is stupid

Quote:

Originally Posted by mcaj22 (Post 9795058)

it took Flacco like 4 games to throw 11 touchdowns

it takes Alex Smith 16 games to throw 18 touchdowns

....

Alex Smith. 2 playoff games. 5 TD passes. 0 INT's.

:hmmm:

So you are really saying that there is a significant difference there?

Player Att Comp Yds Comp TD INT
Joe F 531 317 3,817 59.7 7.2 22 10
2011
Alex S 445 273 3,144 61.3 7.1 17 5

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Laz (Post 9795078)

stupid post is stupid

I was being a smartass. You know all of those whinny little pussies that think we should have taken a mid to late round QB with the #1 overall. That is what those stupid ****s have been saying for years.
They don't care about who or how good. They just want us to draft one. **** it is their attitude. That is what is stupid Laz!

Jaws should know full well about mediocre Chiefs QB's.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Roundup (Post 9795371)

I think most of the reasonable guys who are anti-Alex Smith trade have a stance that is different than this.

Basically, that a shot a mediocrity with Alex Smith in 2013 and 2014 is less desirable than taking a shot with a QB who can potentially be better than 15-22nd best in the NFL.

Disliking the price given up for Alex Smith is not just about passing on a QB in Rnds. 1, 2, 3 in this year's draft. It's also about how much more difficult it will make it to acquire a QB early in next year's draft.

Not in position to take the guy you want because your team went 7-9 or 8-8, Andy Reid? Good luck moving up for that QB without your 2nd/3rd round pick.

That's not to mention the fear the Chiefs will commit to Alex Smith long-term before he proves he can be more than an average game manager that can't win playoff games (unless he's playing the 31st D in the NFL).

Jaws never cared for Alex. Last year he had him ranked at 15th?

Top 4 not sure which order:

Brady
Brees
Manning
Rodgers

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jakemall (Post 9795470)

Jaws never cared for Alex. Last year he had him ranked at 15th?

15 or 16, yeah.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Just Passin' By (Post 9794940)

Every one of them is better than Newton's been, to date.

Cam has 8000 yards, 1400 yards rushing, 62 total touchdowns and 29 INTs.

His first two years are better than just about every QB in the league.