Glad to see it be Huard!!!
 

Before everyone slams my opinion too hard-----I wanted it to be Croyle. How do you have any hope in winning now if it were Croyle though. I look forward to his future but I want to win now, I agree with King Carl on this one. Others on the team expressed some pretty harsh opinions that I'll bet were aimed at this particular decision. Croyle is only in his second year (3rd rd. pick remember, unlike the other young guns in the AFC West). If we don't win, then go with Croyle, give him some NFL playing time when it doesn't matter then I believe he will be ready to go next year. Let the dogg'n begin.

fucking n00b

couldn't this go in the "Huard named starter" thread?

You're going to be disappointed.

After we beat Houston people will settle down...... until we lose to Chicago.

:bang:

Croyle once shot a arrow at a stuffed puppy
he didn't hit it -but it is only time until he shoots a real one
we may have dodged a gigantic bullet

Nope. Just not as opinionated as some.

yes, but.....just shoot me.

I figure we'll win MAYBE two more games this year playing Huard than we would if we'd have started Croyle. Then, next year when Croyle starts, we'll go backwards in the win column because Brodie will be starting from square one again.

Croyle will be the starter in week 5 after we go 1-3

Hopefully, Mcintosh will not be ready until game 3. Then, after CHicago pulverizes Huard, Croyle will start in game 3.

cant help it. rePOST