I Wish We Were Facing Walter Instead Of Brooks...
Not that Brooks is much better but at least it gives the Raiders something - however slim - to rally around. I just don't like how Gunther scales back our pressure when we play QBs prone to sacks/turnovers and fear a repeat with Brooks. Walter would have been lucky to move the ball 100 yards.
|
That is like saying I would rather fight a 90 pound guy without a right arm instead of a 92 pound guy without a left....
It shouldn't matter and if it does shame on the Chiefs. |
Don't care about the rally around part, but Brooks is better than Walter on the basis that he isn't the WORST QB in the NFL. Maybe second- or third-worst, but that's it.
Damn it, Art! |
Brooks should be good for at least 2 INT's at Arrowhead. It honestly doesnt matter much. Brooks and Walters are both bottom of the NFL barrel. I cant believe The Raiders passed on Leinert?? But im glad they did.....
|
You're joking right? Im almost glad we're playing against brooks.... He's one of the biggest idiots when it comes to quarterbacks.
|
Quote:
True, but Brooks can scramble if need be. Walters can't. That's the only reason I'd rather be facing Walters. |
Brooks will be meat on a stick for our defense.
|
Brooks is terrible to start with...now he is terrible and rusty. If we lose to him we deserve a fate worse than the plague.
|
The only way we lose is if we play like complete shit. And if we play like complete shit, we deserve to lose.
|
I sense nervous mulletheads.
|
Conventional wisdom:
Oakland will sign Damon Huard in the offseason. Remember this guy? http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y44...ABN/Gannon.jpg |
Quote:
|
something is telling me we really shouldn't worry. But the other is better than Brooks, I totally agree. Hopefully we won't have any major setbacks.
|
um...last time we played Brooks he beat us. Much rather face the young kid.
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:43 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.