ChiefsPlanet
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Saccopoo Memorial Draft Forum (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=29)
-   -   Down on Star Lotulelei? Then you are doing the draft wrong. (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=270845)

buddha 03-08-2013 10:42 AM
The take away from those clips is this...USC's o-line was shitty! Everybody on the Utah DL looked like first rounders.

But don't let any of the "the o-line doesn't matter in the NFL" guys hear that.

I hope the heart condition thing isn't serious...this kid is very fun to watch no matter who he plays for.

DJ's left nut 03-08-2013 11:55 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Saccopoo (Post 9476429)
As said countless times before, he's not a 34 five tech defensive end. He doesn't have the length to play on the outside of a 34. He's a 43 NT.

We should have drafted Michael Brockers last year if you wanted a good 34 five tech prospect.
Yup. Brockers was a perfect fit.

I'm pleasantly surprised by what Poe did last season, but I'm still disappointed that we didn't take Brockers instead.

Direckshun 03-08-2013 01:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 9477126)
Yup. Brockers was a perfect fit.

I'm pleasantly surprised by what Poe did last season, but I'm still disappointed that we didn't take Brockers instead.
Brockers went off the board five picks ahead of us.

Nightfyre 03-08-2013 01:25 PM
Uh, no he didn't.

The Franchise 03-08-2013 01:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Direckshun (Post 9477303)
Brockers went off the board five picks ahead of us.
He went 3 picks after Poe.

Direckshun 03-08-2013 01:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 9477337)
He went 3 picks after Poe.
Who am I thinking of, then?

Edit: Looked back over the 2012 draft. I have no idea.

The Franchise 03-08-2013 01:39 PM
Fletcher Cox went one pick after Poe.

CleveSteve 03-11-2013 08:46 AM
I fully agree, Direckshun. I've had Star to the Chiefs #1 overall since January. You guys need help on the DL bad, and he's by far the best candidate for that role. He can play any line position in a 3-4 front.

Dave Lane 03-11-2013 08:59 AM
That video is is way worse than Glenn Dorseys rookie video. Pass.

Dave Lane 03-11-2013 09:00 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by CleveSteve (Post 9484600)
I fully agree, Direckshun. I've had Star to the Chiefs #1 overall since January. You guys need help on the DL bad, and he's by far the best candidate for that role. He can play any line position in a 3-4 front.
No.

CleveSteve 03-11-2013 09:02 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave Lane (Post 9484631)
That video is is way worse than Glenn Dorseys rookie video. Pass.
Glenn Dorsey is a totally different kind of guy and never should have been drafted into a 3-4. That's not his game at all. He was strictly a penetrating 4-3 UT and he gets put into a vanilla Romeo Crennell two-gap 3-4 as a DE? That's setting a guy up to fail. That's what I think, anyways. That's what I thought then, too.

jd1020 03-11-2013 09:07 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by CleveSteve (Post 9484642)
Glenn Dorsey is a totally different kind of guy and never should have been drafted into a 3-4. That's not his game at all. He was strictly a penetrating 4-3 UT and he gets put into a vanilla Romeo Crennell two-gap 3-4 as a DE? That's setting a guy up to fail. That's what I think, anyways. That's what I thought then, too.
He was drafted into a 4-3, champ. Do you know anything about the Chiefs?

CleveSteve 03-11-2013 09:21 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 9484651)
He was drafted into a 4-3, champ. Do you know anything about the Chiefs?
My bad. :thumb: I still think he could succeed in a 4-3 as a UT. He never should have been a 5T end, though.

Saccopoo 03-11-2013 09:32 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 9484651)
He was drafted into a 4-3, champ. Do you know anything about the Chiefs?
Ouch.

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_g3IRMXdaMF...-R/kicknut.jpg

Sorter 03-11-2013 10:24 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by CleveSteve (Post 9484696)
My bad. :thumb: I still think he could succeed in a 4-3 as a UT. He never should have been a 5T end, though.
If he could, he would have shown productivity in subs. He didn't.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:50 AM.
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.