High Definition experts I need your help...
I'm in an argument with a guy at work over High Definition.
His argument is that aspect ratio has nothing to do with true HD. I say that true HD can only be seen on a 16:9 screen while he says that you can see true HD on a 4:3 screen too. I tried to explain to him the difference between 480, 720 & 1080 but he still says you can see true HD reception on a 4:3 aspect ratio because all high definition means is the scan lines. Has anyone got an url that provides the answer to this argument? |
Quote:
Most stations all broadcast widescreen, that is the standard. I think 4:3 sucks, and they should all have to broadcast widescreen Edit - after further thought, I am not 100% sure. I will take a gander at some links. I know its the standard, but in relation to your argument I think your friend is right. |
http://www.trustedreviews.com/articl...ge=7573&head=0
"...Another important point is that a television MUST conform to a widescreen aspect ratio in order to sport the HD Ready logo, which could be the final death knell for 4:3 TVs..." Basically, to be "true" HD, you need to be in a wide aspect ratio. I think things are going to be a bit fuzzy on the subject for quite a while, but the standard says wide (16:9). Read the whole article, it is all you would ever want to know about HD... very well done. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
They are really the only one that uses a stretch mode. At least for the HD channels for Time Warner. |
Doesn't this prove my point?
1) The minimum resolution of the display must be 720 lines in a widescreen aspect ratio. |
Quote:
Or if you guys are as nerdy as you sound, just hide his glasses. |
HD in 4:3 ratio would just mean more pixels...
Think of it as the difference between a monitor at 1280x960 and a monitor at 1280x720. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:47 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.