ChiefsPlanet
Page 5 of 9 1234 5 6789
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Podcast: Rich Baldinger Talks Chiefs OL (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=270915)

Pasta Little Brioni 03-09-2013 05:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Buzz_TinBalls (Post 9480640)
seymour and kelly own the chiefs. in fact any DL with some players owns the Chiefs. Like say, the Ravens.
Chiefs ran for 300 on the Ravens and they KNEW the team wasn't going to pass. Our O-line pushed their shit in that game.

Ace Gunner 03-09-2013 06:00 PM
No bro. Jamaal ****ing Charles has been running behind all five of your grandmas. the ****ng guy is special like that. really. like barry ****ing sanders special. but it is wasted.

milkman 03-09-2013 06:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by patteeu (Post 9480690)
Truth. It's unfortunate that some people feel the need to discount the importance of the OLine in order to justify their QB takes.
No one is discounting the importance of the O-Line.

We are discounting the absolutely moronic idea pushed by ****ing idiots like you that we need to throw first round draft picks at every god damn year.

Ace Gunner 03-09-2013 06:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PGM (Post 9480818)
Chiefs ran for 300 on the Ravens and they KNEW the team wasn't going to pass. Our O-line pushed their shit in that game.
pfffft.

BossChief 03-09-2013 06:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by patteeu (Post 9480007)
You don't keep him if you don't like him (and you have an alternative), but you don't have to keep him just because you tagged him. He could be traded or have his tag rescinded, couldn't he?
The last two days, ESPN has been scrolling that the Chiefs are negotiating a long term contract with Albert.

Pasta Little Brioni 03-09-2013 06:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by milkman (Post 9480844)
No one is discounting the importance of the O-Line.

We are discounting the absolutely moronic idea pushed by ****ing idiots like you that we need to throw first round draft picks at every god damn year.
I will. You can win a Super Bowl with a bad O-line, you have to have high level QB play. We didn't have a bad line. In fact we had a pretty good/young unit. Cutting Winston and then drafting Jekyll or whoever to play RT would be one of the bigger fails in team draft history.

Pasta Little Brioni 03-09-2013 06:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Buzz_TinBalls (Post 9480847)
pfffft.
Absolutely pushed their shit in. If not for Cassel we would have raped them.

Ace Gunner 03-09-2013 06:11 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PGM (Post 9480867)
Absolutely pushed their shit in. If not for Cassel we would have raped them.
no. if not for cassel, we would have at least made it respectable. they beat Jamaal down after the TD and that's where it all came to a close.

Ace Gunner 03-09-2013 06:12 PM
the defense was fire that game -- they kept it close for almost 45 minutes.

milkman 03-09-2013 06:13 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PGM (Post 9480852)
I will. You can win a Super Bowl with a bad O-line, you have to have high level QB play. We didn't have a bad line. In fact we had a pretty good/young unit. Cutting Winston and then drafting Jekyll or whoever to play RT would be one of the bigger fails in team draft history.
Both Aaron Rodgers and Eli Manning had brilliant playoff seasons in their SB wins.

But they are exceptions, along with a guy like Ben Roethlisberger.

Most QBs do need adequate protection.

At the end of the day, however, I don't give a rat's if you have the Cowboys line of the 90s or the Roaf/Shields line of the start of this milenium, you ain't winning jack with a mediocre QB

Pasta Little Brioni 03-09-2013 06:14 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Buzz_TinBalls (Post 9480870)
no. if not for cassel, we would have at least made it respectable. they beat Jamaal down after the TD and that's where it all came to a close.
We lost 9-6 :#

You seem to be talking about the playoff game for some unknown reason.

milkman 03-09-2013 06:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Buzz_TinBalls (Post 9480870)
no. if not for cassel, we would have at least made it respectable. they beat Jamaal down after the TD and that's where it all came to a close.
The Ravens adjusted at the half by putting everyone but your worthless parents in the box and daring Cassel to beat them.

Before that adjustment, the Chiefs line was abusing the Ravens.

Ace Gunner 03-09-2013 06:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PGM (Post 9480882)
We lost 9-6 :#

You seem to be talking about the playoff game for some unknown reason.
oh, you're talking this year. look, there is a lot of raw talent on this team. the OL had some of that. But JFC they wer not a OL that provided blocking for adequate amounts of time. it's just raw talent. there isn't anything developing with those guys.

milkman 03-09-2013 06:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Buzz_TinBalls (Post 9480893)
oh, you're talking this year. look, there is a lot of raw talent on this team. the OL had some of that. But JFC they wer not a OL that provided blocking for adequate amounts of time. it's just raw talent. there isn't anything developing with those guys.
Oh, jesus ****.

Did your parents use your head as a hammer when you were a baby?

patteeu 03-09-2013 06:58 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by milkman (Post 9480795)
No dumbass.

The premise presented by CoMo is that you are tagging your best O-Lineman and drafting the guy viewed by some as the best in the draft.

Tagging Albertg to trade him is an entirely different discussion.
You're imagining things. Either that or making them up in a futile effort to save face.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:22 AM.
Page 5 of 9 1234 5 6789
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.