Rams hold the key to Chiefs trade-down.
 

IMO.

Do you guys think there's a chance St Louis will not pick Bradford at 1? If they don't, our 5th position becomes very valuable to teams like Cleveland, Seattle and San Fran. The latter two have two firsts each. :hmmm: I would not mind seeing those three in a Bradford sweepstake competing for our 5. Possibly even the Jax.

If this has already been discussed, I have not seen it. So there!

We'd be wise to take a very good deal and not push for an epic deal. Teams won't fear the Seahawks taking Bradford IMO. Certainly worth a roll of the dice.

They were discussing this last night on Total Access. One of them suggested that if Bradford lasted until 5, that the Chiefs should just turn in the card, and forget dealing for more draft picks.

:facepalm:

The Rams are taking Bradford...thread over.

TAKE THE FREAKING QUARTERBACK!

Ahem. (Cough, cough. Smoothing down suit.) In that scenario, I would support drafting the quarterback.

Honestly, I bet if Peyton Manning was on the board and the Chiefs were up, there would be fans wanting to trade down.

Enough of this ****ing madness.

Many Chiefs fans understand QB play about as well as many Royals fans understand SS play.

LMAO

For this offense, I don't know what Manning would give you over Cassel. Cassel has better mobility, a little better size and while not as accurate, he's got about the same arm strength.

Plus, Manning, for all the accolades, has only one Super Bowl victory. Trent Dilfer has one SB victory.

Speak for yourself, betancourt has a cannon!

I had to quote this.

That is all.

Good lord

if bradfords available its a no brainer. we take him.

would tampa take bradford? would washington? how much money do they really have tied up in freeman or mcnabb long term? does either team think they have their QBOF? also, the rams are taking bradford.

Please, someone just kill Sacc, that or ban him.

We see you've been enjoying 420 day!!!!!