ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Media Center (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Movies and TV The Avengers Panel - Comic Con 2010 - Cast And Director Introduced (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=231135)

Tribal Warfare 07-26-2010 09:42 PM

The Avengers Panel - Comic Con 2010 - Cast And Director Introduced
 
<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/ci5F7M_0gek&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/ci5F7M_0gek&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>

Swanman 07-27-2010 07:26 AM

Losing Ed Norton sucked, but Jeremy Renner is a real nice add.

The Franchise 07-27-2010 09:17 AM

That movie is either going to be ****ing tits.....or it's going to be a huge bust.

Sofa King 07-27-2010 10:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 6900166)
That movie is either going to be ****ing tits.....or it's going to be a huge bust.

i was thinking that Bale was going to be in this as batman... wtf happened to that? or am i missing something...

The Franchise 07-27-2010 10:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sofa King (Post 6900275)
i was thinking that Bale was going to be in this as batman... wtf happened to that? or am i missing something...

ROFL:spock:

NewChief 07-27-2010 10:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sofa King (Post 6900275)
i was thinking that Bale was going to be in this as batman... wtf happened to that? or am i missing something...

Not a big fan of comics, eh?

Or were you making a joke?

Mr. Laz 07-27-2010 10:36 AM

eww ... didn't know who mark ruffalo was until i saw him walk out.


not a fan

CoMoChief 07-27-2010 10:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NewPhin (Post 6900305)
Not a big fan of comics, eh?

Or were you making a joke?

Not eveyone's a ****ing nerd.

The Franchise 07-27-2010 10:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CoMoChief (Post 6900333)
Not eveyone's a ****ing nerd.

And apparently you're proof that not everyone is smart either.

Sofa King 07-27-2010 10:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NewPhin (Post 6900305)
Not a big fan of comics, eh?

Or were you making a joke?

http://api.ning.com/files/H-Tnf2UGPr...heAvengers.jpg


Nope. But i thought i heard something with Justice League in there as well...

siberian khatru 07-27-2010 10:41 AM

I have my doubts, but I trust in Whedon.

NewChief 07-27-2010 10:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CoMoChief (Post 6900333)
Not eveyone's a ****ing nerd.

Seeing as you're reading a thread about a youtube video from Comic Con 2010, we'll grant you at least temporary membership.

The Elder 07-28-2010 06:38 PM

The Justice League is DC and the Avengers is a Marvel title. There has been talk of a Justice League Movie for years but that has fallen apart. Dc has instead focus on the next Batman movie and the Superman reboot ans well as Green Lantern and the Flash. Dont expect to see A JLA movie until at least 2016. Right now it all Marvel. and the way its looking Thor is gonna be alot more then anyone thought.

Deberg_1990 07-28-2010 09:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 6900166)
That movie is either going to be ****ing tits.....or it's going to be a huge bust.

I think it will be good. Whedon is a nice choice to make it. His strength is working with ensemble casts and is probably why he got the gig.

Red Brooklyn 07-29-2010 08:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 6904209)
I think it will be good. Whedon is a nice choice to make it. His strength is working with ensemble casts and is probably why he got the gig.

Exactly.

Plus the strength of cast is pretty fierce. It would be one thing if you had a bunch of hacks up there. But you've got Downey Jr, Ruffalo, Renner, Jackson... damn. The script could be trash and I'd still bet that the cast and director could pull out a movie at least as good as the last Hulk film.

This has a lot of potential. But if it fails... it'll be a disater big enough to end Hollywood's (and maybe even fan's) interest in the super-hero genre for a while.

The Elder 07-29-2010 11:07 AM

I dont think it will end no matter what happens. There are so many remakes and "RE BOOTS" The movie industry has really run out of new ideas. Comics open an entire new world to them and there are so many characters to work with.

Tribal Warfare 07-29-2010 11:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Elder (Post 6905092)
I dont think it will end no matter what happens. There are so many remakes and "RE BOOTS" The movie industry has really run out of new ideas. Comics open an entire new world to them and there are so many characters to work with.

Hollywood hasn't ran out of ideas it's more the concept of bankable "built in "audiences for a less chance of failure at the box office.

Red Brooklyn 07-29-2010 11:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare (Post 6905124)
Hollywood hasn't ran out of ideas it's more the concept of bankable "built in "audiences for a less chance of failure at the box office.

Exactly.

But the question is whether or not that well is infinite. If Hollywood makes a "comic book movie" bad enough to turn off the majority of the built in audience, it's possible that the trend could fall off.

Hollywood would just find the next built in audience to squeeze.

Deberg_1990 07-29-2010 11:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare (Post 6905124)
Hollywood hasn't ran out of ideas it's more the concept of bankable "built in "audiences for a less chance of failure at the box office.

This....they are a business like any other.

Giving the consumer exactly what they want.

Valiant 07-29-2010 04:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 6900335)
And apparently you're proof that not everyone is smart either.

that exchange brought a tear to my eye..

Hopefully he read further down that batman is not a Marvel character..

keg in kc 07-25-2011 08:00 AM

1 Attachment(s)
Coolness...

Full size version

Deberg_1990 07-25-2011 08:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 7769414)
Coolness...

Full size version

That kicks a whole lot of a$$!

007 07-25-2011 09:17 AM

video got pulled. crap

Rausch 07-25-2011 10:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Guru (Post 7769540)
video got pulled. crap

And they put this up...

http://img15.imageshack.us/img15/787...rsassemble.png

Deberg_1990 09-29-2011 11:10 AM

EW's tease of Avengers cover

Why does Banner look like a Douche in this pic?


http://popwatch.ew.com/2011/09/29/th...s-weeks-cover/

The Franchise 09-29-2011 11:21 AM

Why is Black Widow so prominent on that cover? **** her.

Tribal Warfare 09-29-2011 11:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 7952610)
Why is Black Widow so prominent on that cover? **** her.


I would the whole thing

Sofa King 09-29-2011 03:17 PM

I think this movie will suck balls.

Bowser 09-29-2011 03:44 PM

Cartman belongs in the Avengers.

Mr. Laz 09-29-2011 05:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 7952610)
Why is Black Widow so prominent on that cover? **** her.

You know how i know you're gay?


http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-c70qqUtpFT...ades-fotos.jpg

The Franchise 09-29-2011 05:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laz (Post 7953519)

Apparently you don't realize that I'm talking about the character....not the actress.

But then again....this is Laz that I'm talking about.....so yeah. You might as well be CoMo.

Fish 10-11-2011 11:15 AM

First trailer....

<iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/nX72FLkZJU4" allowfullscreen="" width="640" frameborder="0" height="360"></iframe>

The Franchise 10-11-2011 11:18 AM

Avengers + NIN = Awesome.

NewChief 10-11-2011 11:42 AM

Any clue who the big baddie is supposed to be on this?


Nevermind... it's Loki. Found it on wikipedia.

Fish 10-11-2011 11:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NewChief (Post 7986475)
Any clue who the big baddie is supposed to be on this?

It kinda looked like Loki to me....

NewChief 10-11-2011 11:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC Fish (Post 7986482)
It kinda looked like Loki to me....

Yeah, that's what I thought as well when I first saw it... when I read it on wikipedia and figured out I was right.... let's just say I had an epiphany about my level of geekiness.

Deberg_1990 10-11-2011 11:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC Fish (Post 7986386)
First trailer....

sweet! Anyone else get wood?

Rausch 10-11-2011 11:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 7986396)
Avengers + NIN = Awesome.


:whackit:

http://chuckisawesome.org/wp-content.../power_fap.jpg

Valiant 10-11-2011 06:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laz (Post 7953519)

You see her hacked pictures.. So lovely..

Valiant 10-11-2011 06:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NewChief (Post 7986490)
Yeah, that's what I thought as well when I first saw it... when I read it on wikipedia and figured out I was right.... let's just say I had an epiphany about my level of geekiness.

I take it you did not stay till the credits were done with Thor.. Showed Loki and the cosmic cube..


As for the people saying it will suck.. I do not think it will be anything awe inspiring.. But it will be an updated ID4 type movie, with bigger actors, explosions and action.. Great blockbuster have fun and geek out movie..

Rausch 10-12-2011 12:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Valiant (Post 7987630)
I take it you did not stay till the credits were done with Thor.. Showed Loki and the cosmic cube..

If you were ever nerd enough to read any Avengers comic you'd know Loki is why they joined up.


Quote:

Originally Posted by Valiant (Post 7987630)
As for the people saying it will suck.. I do not think it will be anything awe inspiring.. But it will be an updated ID4 type movie, with bigger actors, explosions and action.. Great blockbuster have fun and geek out movie..

I expect more.

If this were just Batman, or just Spiderman, or just Superman I could go with that. That's not the plan.

Despite the fact they cut my favorite actor (Ed Norton) it's still a great cast. If the writing is worth a $#it at all Evans (Cap) and Downey Jr. (Iron Man) could carry this move by themselves.

With Sam-L and Scarlett as the fanservice this has no excuse not to be knocked out of the park.

You don't use 5 years of build up for a "eh, that was pretty good" kind of movie...

007 10-12-2011 02:43 AM

This better rock. And it better be at least 2.5 hours long.

keg in kc 10-12-2011 07:17 AM

Pretty badass trailer.

Deberg_1990 10-12-2011 07:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 7988196)
If the writing is worth a $#it at all Evans (Cap) and Downey Jr. (Iron Man) could carry this move by themselves.

Well its written and directed by Josh (Buffy, Firefly, Dollhouse) Whedon. His strong suit is his snappy dialogue and strong writing. Hes also a big comic book geek and has written several. He hasnt directed much "big action" except for the Firefly movie, but alot of action scenes are directed by 2nd unit crews now days anyways...I fully expect his script and dialogue to be top notch.

The Franchise 10-24-2011 01:14 PM

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/2aLgdMz0p5Y" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

ThaVirus 10-24-2011 01:40 PM

1:26.. I wonder what's up with Thor attacking Cap. Speculation?

Bowser 10-24-2011 01:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 8044965)
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/2aLgdMz0p5Y" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Heh. Proof positive that too many people have too much time on their hands.

Tribal Warfare 11-20-2011 03:02 AM

Interview: Joss Whedon Assembles ‘The Avengers’

Matt McDaniel: You have done a lot of work with big ensembles before, but this is the first time coming into a group of pre-established characters and actors. How is that different than working with a group that you created from the ground-up?

Joss Whedon: Well, in some ways it's the same, because if you are ever working with a group you have created from ground-up, they feel they have been created already and they exist and the actors have already researched the roles. So it has a great similarity to working on anything, like a show you run.

But the difference, obviously, is not just that they played the parts before, but they are all super famous. And so you have the question of whether or not you are going to earn their trust. Whether or not they are going to bother to give you that. But ultimately, once you establish that fairly early on, that you have a real collaboration going, it really isn't that different.

MM: So what was that process like of earning the trust of these really well-established actors?

JW: Well, first of all, because they've played parts and because in some way we were creating a new vision of the part, I sat down with every one of them to talk about my ideas and their desires before I wrote the script, and that's very useful too.

So they knew from the ground-up that they were collaborating on it. And the things that didn't make sense to them or didn't work to them, they were like, "Well, I don't want to stress that part of my character. We have done that before." All of that stuff I could honor.

And then it's a question of making them heard, and then ultimately making them understand that there are things you are not going to budge on that are your vision. And once they know they are part of it, but you actually have a vision, and you are not just trying to tell them what they want to hear -- that it's all working towards one purpose, one story, one idea -- then I feel, yeah, you are doing fine.

MM: I have heard from people who have worked with him before that Robert Downey Jr. likes to keep things sort of fresh and fast. How did your two methods of working fit into each others'?

JW: Well, we have very different methods. But working as a showrunner, working as a script doctor, working in sitcoms -- a lot of my work has been coming up with stuff on the fly. Like fixing as we go, improvising, being open to a new idea. So Robert and I would spend -- we worked specifically towards both of our processes, so that we would beat out a scene so that he was very comfortable with where it was going or what was being said and very aware of where it would fit in the whole. And I would give him stuff to say, and by and large, he would say it.

But then there were always pockets where we had some wiggle room for him to play, or ask for options, and if he said, "Can we do something else here?" I could give him four or five options by the time he had his makeup on. Because that's actually fun for me, that frantic scramble.

We would try different things. He is very collaborative. He loves notes. He loves to be guided and worked with. He is not trying to steamroller over me. He is really trying to create it side-by-side with me. So it ended up being a really healthy and delightful collaboration.

MM: Now, you said you talked to everybody sort of about their character, was there sort of an aspect or facet of Tony Stark that Robert brought up that you hadn't considered before?

JW:I think the conversations were largely about "Where is Tony now?" Like, "Who is he now? Where is he [going] from 'Iron Man 2' towards 'Iron Man 3'?" He is such a well-delineated character, so it was really a question of, "What do we want to stress and what do we want to say? We have said that, we have done that, so let's not go there."

He felt a sort of isolated man who is -- even though there is an element of that, just because that's sort of what any team movie is about. He didn't want to be the sort of just, "I am totally wrapped up in one thing and I am not thinking about everybody else." He didn't want to be the tortured lonely man, which I totally get. And it was easy to make him as delightful and gregarious as he can be and still go, well, there is a piece missing and it's the piece that makes him an Avenger.

MM:I was really impressed by Chris Evans in "Captain America" because his performance was so different than what you usually see from him. There was no snark, no sarcastic edge to him. How did you have to adapt your sort of writing style to fit that sort of straightforward character?

JW:I love a straightforward character. I am the guy who loves Cyclops on the 'X-Men', because he is square. [Captain America] is a little square, and he is aware that he is a little square, and he is aware that the world is a beat ahead of him, or in his case, 70 beats. I think that's very disarming and very charming. I relate to that guy. I also don't know who the popular singers are right now, so he is actually really easy for me to write.

There were some lines where [Chris] would be like, "Okay, now I just sound like an idiot." And in context, I was like, "Yeah, actually, now that it's all laid out that is a bit much." But he is very aware of his dignity, but at the same time understood why I wanted to find the humor in somebody who was so out of touch.

MM: You have Mark Ruffalo stepping in for the first time playing the character of Bruce Banner. So did you feel more freedom to kind of create your own take on the character?

JW: Yeah, he and I did the most character work of anyone, because we really were starting fresh, but we were starting with something that had been embodied several times.

And both of us agreed upfront that the template for who we wanted this guy to be in his life was Bill Bixby, the TV [show character] who was busy helping other people. That was more interesting to us than the Banner in the first two movies who was always fixated on curing himself. We spent a lot of time talking about what makes us Hulk out, the nature of anger, how it feels.

We even fought some. I mean literally we actually got some pads out and did some tussling. Just to talk about the physicality, and also the physicality of somebody who has to control this thing, and the way he moves in space and the way he relates to the people and the objects around him. It was extremely fun. What we found was that he could be very bumbling and kind of awkward, but at the same time very graceful and in this almost transcendent control of himself.

MM: Personally, I am excited for the movie just to see the character of Nick Fury come into his own, because we have just gotten these little glimpses of his function in this world. Did you want to keep that edge of mystery to him, or explore who he is underneath the patch?

JW: Well, he is not going to be talking about his childhood, and you do want to keep a certain mystery. Also -- and this is something that I was very pleased that Marvel actually mandated -- they were very interested in keeping him, not just in the sort of a mystery of how the organization operates, but a real moral gray area where you really have to decide, "Is Nick Fury the most manipulative guy in the world? Is he a good guy? Is he completely Machiavellian or is it a bit of both?" And that was really fun to tweak.

I felt that in the other movies, they had been cameos and he had been called upon to come in and be Sam Jackson and bluster a little bit. And I told Sam upfront that my big agenda was to see the weight on someone who is supposed to be in control of the most powerful beings on the planet. The weight on somebody who has to run the organization and the gravity of it. Not that we don't have any fun with Nick, but he definitely -- it's, I feel like a much more textured performance and at times really moving.

MM: For you as the director, what was the more sort of intimidating tasks, these giant action scenes with 100 cars blowing up, or the sort of group scenes where you have eight major characters and they all need their own story to come through?

JW: I had one week where we shot basically the entire team arguing. I was like, "If I can get through this week, no bullet can harm me." And that week actually was complex, but went off really, really well.

Then we got to the cars exploding, and I realized, "Well, this is actually much harder." And what's harder about it was that, trying to keep action from being generic -- from being the same gag over and over and over -- it's extremely tough. Because we have a go-to, and it's the cars flip over and blow up. And to take that and go, "Okay, well, how do I contextualize this? How do I make it matter, and how do I make it different, and how do I differentiate all their powers and their actions?"

I ended up spending as much time writing the stunts as I did writing the dialogue. Just trying to keep track of who everybody was, what they were capable of, and keeping it from being repetitive. So the thing that I feared was, it's never the bullet that you see coming.

MM: I imagine the other hard part about that is balancing a God and who can create lightning, and a guy with a bow and arrow, and giving them both the action that brings out the best in them.

JW:Yeah. Well, I feel like we pulled that off. At the end of the day, the guy with the bow and arrow is a lot easier to write gags for than the God. But we created a situation where everybody can be useful, and everybody can be in jeopardy, and they really can act as a team, even though -- as we have known from the first issue of 'The Avengers' comic -- there's no reason for these people to be on the same team.

MM: All this talk of superheroes is great, but I am also kind of curious about supervillains, specifically Dr. Horrible. Now that you are finishing "Avengers," are we looking to get another installment of his story?

JW: We have been working on that for a while. It's been hard, because we all have jobs, and some of them are extremely taxing. But we have had a vision of the thing for a while, we have been working on it, we have a bunch of songs and a few scenes. We need a little free time and right now that's plenty hard to come by.

beach tribe 11-20-2011 06:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 7986396)
Avengers + NIN = Awesome.

Yeah, I was gonna say that.

beach tribe 11-20-2011 06:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThaVirus (Post 8045051)
1:26.. I wonder what's up with Thor attacking Cap. Speculation?

I'm thinking they send Cap after Thor, and he jerks him back to earth. Thor doesn't know who he is, and proceeds to vanquish thee who has besmirched him.
I was kind of disappointed to see that scene, because though the shield may be bad ass it wouldn't save CA's life in that situation.

beach tribe 11-20-2011 06:56 AM

This movie will kick-ass.
And although Loki, and the cube are cool, the TRUE killer that possessed the cube in the comics, and who it took a hell of a lot more than the avengers to get it away from him is coming...
http://i254.photobucket.com/albums/h...l29/thanos.jpghttp://i254.photobucket.com/albums/h...tlet_super.jpg

Tribal Warfare 02-01-2012 11:59 AM

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/fZsu3sbWnAU" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

007 02-01-2012 04:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare (Post 8340929)
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/fZsu3sbWnAU" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Man, they must not expect this movie to do well. Just a 17 second spot?:)

Deberg_1990 02-05-2012 07:51 PM

Full Super Bowl ad kicks all kinds of a$$!!


"I have an Army"

"We have a Hulk"



<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/QM5WuOwpodo" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

ThaVirus 02-06-2012 11:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 8351502)
Full Super Bowl ad kicks all kinds of a$$!!


"I have an Army"

"We have a Hulk"



<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/QM5WuOwpodo" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

IRON MAN AT :35!!!!

GROUP SHOT AT :42!!!!

THE HULK AT :57!!!!

AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!1






.... I just came.

Valiant 02-06-2012 02:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 8044965)
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/2aLgdMz0p5Y" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

That was ****ign awesome..

Buck 02-06-2012 03:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 8351502)
Full Super Bowl ad kicks all kinds of a$$!!


"I have an Army"

"We have a Hulk"



<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/QM5WuOwpodo" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

A few things here.

1. I have yet to see Captain America. I've heard it wasn't very good. Should I still watch it before I see The Avengers?

2. Stark just nonchalantly talking shit to Loki was awesome.

3. I didn't even realize that Jeremy Renner was playing Hawkeye, or that they were going to even have members outside of Thor, Capt. America, The Hulk, or Iron Man.

4. I hope that Scarlett Johansson does Black Widow well. I would hate for the hot piece of ass to act horribly and ruin a movie.

5. I came about 14 times in those 65 seconds.

SLAG 02-06-2012 03:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buck (Post 8353779)
A few things here.

1. I have yet to see Captain America. I've heard it wasn't very good. Should I still watch it before I see The Avengers?

2. Stark just nonchalantly talking shit to Loki was awesome.

3. I didn't even realize that Jeremy Renner was playing Hawkeye, or that they were going to even have members outside of Thor, Capt. America, The Hulk, or Iron Man.

4. I hope that Scarlett Johansson does Black Widow well. I would hate for the hot piece of ass to act horribly and ruin a movie.

5. I came about 14 times in those 65 seconds.


1- YES Watch it - It was VERY good - Whoever told you it wasn't should inject flaming aids needles etc.

2- Yes

3- Yes
4- She did well in Iron Man 2 - so I expect more of the same hotness from here in Avengers

5- Yes

Buck 02-06-2012 03:29 PM

And May 4th **** yes. I figured this would be July 4th.

Buck 02-06-2012 03:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SLAG (Post 8353784)
1- YES Watch it - It was VERY good - Whoever told you it wasn't should inject flaming aids needles etc.

2- Yes

3- Yes
4- She did well in Iron Man 2 - so I expect more of the same hotness from here in Avengers

5- Yes

God damn I forgot she was in Iron Man 2. I need to watch it again. I thought it was better than #1, but I haven't bought it on Blu-Ray yet, so I've only seen it the once.

I have a feeling that I'll be buying Iron Man 2, Captain America, and Thor on Blu-Ray and then marathon all of the Marvel movies before it comes out.

Setsuna 02-06-2012 03:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buck (Post 8353779)
A few things here.

1. I have yet to see Captain America. I've heard it wasn't very good. Should I still watch it before I see The Avengers?

2. Stark just nonchalantly talking shit to Loki was awesome.

3. I didn't even realize that Jeremy Renner was playing Hawkeye, or that they were going to even have members outside of Thor, Capt. America, The Hulk, or Iron Man.

4. I hope that Scarlett Johansson does Black Widow well. I would hate for the hot piece of ass to act horribly and ruin a movie.

5. I came about 14 times in those 65 seconds.

1. It was fairly decent, they did well with that transformation of him. There were times where you could tell, original Steve Rogers was CGI, but they did the best they could have and it worked. Had a nice filter to the picture that made you feel like you were in the 1900s. I liked it. Not memorable but worth it. Even if you don't feel it's good, just the ending alone makes up for it.

2. Tru dat

3. Renner is the next big thing, QUOTE ME ON THAT!

4. Agreed

5. Only 10 for me :(

Buck 02-06-2012 03:40 PM

Are those soldiers Skrull?

Are there any other villains other than Loki?

FAX 02-06-2012 03:46 PM

This is going to be a great movie.

Beats the heck out of changing lightbulbs.

FAX

ThaVirus 02-06-2012 03:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buck (Post 8353779)
1. I have yet to see Captain America. I've heard it wasn't very good. Should I still watch it before I see The Avengers?

Yes, of course. Even if it wasn't good you should still watch it, dummy. Personally I thought it was good, but I'm a fan of Cap and Chris Evans sooooo...

It's probably the worst out of The Incredible Hulk, Iron Man 1&2, and Thor; but I'd give each of those movies a 7.5 or higher so that doesn't mean much.

ThaVirus 02-06-2012 03:56 PM

Also, what are the chances they throw in a nod to Luke Cage, Spidey and Wolverine?

Maybe a little cameo or something. Please, PLEASE! I'd JIMP immediately.

Valiant 02-06-2012 04:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThaVirus (Post 8353861)
Also, what are the chances they throw in a nod to Luke Cage, Spidey and Wolverine?

Maybe a little cameo or something. Please, PLEASE! I'd JIMP immediately.

I hope not.. I do not want them x3'ing the movie with too much..

SLAG 02-06-2012 04:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buck (Post 8353795)
God damn I forgot she was in Iron Man 2. I need to watch it again. I thought it was better than #1, but I haven't bought it on Blu-Ray yet, so I've only seen it the once.

I have a feeling that I'll be buying Iron Man 2, Captain America, and Thor on Blu-Ray and then marathon all of the Marvel movies before it comes out.

Yeah - I just got done watching them all about 2 weeks ago - and Hulk even though Ed Norton isn't in it.

Iron Man 2 is on Netflix Watch instantly FTR

Buck 02-06-2012 04:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SLAG (Post 8353941)
Yeah - I just got done watching them all about 2 weeks ago - and Hulk even though Ed Norton isn't in it.

Iron Man 2 is on Netflix Watch instantly FTR

Oh shit is it?

I know what I'm watching tonight.

keg in kc 02-06-2012 04:42 PM

Don't expect too much from IM2, assuming you haven't seen it. Some cool effects, but not a very good movie compared to the first.

Captain America is fine for what it is, leave-your-brain-at-the-door popcorn schlock. The only real problem I had with it is that it felt like they missed the target in the last fifteen minutes, but otherwise it's pretty fun, and pretty drastically different from any comic movies from before, with the period setting (caveat: i still haven't seen First Class...).

I wouldn't expect to see SM or Wolverine in the Avengers, since the properties are owned by different studios.

Cool trailer, in the action porn sense. Hope there's some meat to the movie.

AustinChief 02-06-2012 04:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buck (Post 8353822)
Are those soldiers Skrull?

Are there any other villains other than Loki?

Loki + an army... Kevin Feige says they are NOT Skrull. Speculation is that they are Badoon. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Badoon

Buck 02-06-2012 04:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 8353981)
Don't expect too much from IM2, assuming you haven't seen it. Some cool effects, but not a very good movie compared to the first.

Captain America is fine for what it is, leave-your-brain-at-the-door popcorn schlock. The only real problem I had with it is that it felt like they missed the target in the last fifteen minutes, but otherwise it's pretty fun, and pretty drastically different from any comic movies from before, with the period setting (caveat: i still haven't seen First Class...).

I wouldn't expect to see SM or Wolverine in the Avengers, since the properties are owned by different studios.

Cool trailer, in the action porn sense. Hope there's some meat to the movie.

I've seen Iron Man 2, and I thought it was better than the first.

Deberg_1990 02-06-2012 04:51 PM

Renner as Hawkeye made a cameo appearance in Thor as well.

keg in kc 02-06-2012 05:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buck (Post 8353991)
I've seen Iron Man 2, and I thought it was better than the first.

I'd say you're in the minority on that one. But, hey, your opinion's the only one that counts when you're the one buying the movie.

Buck 02-06-2012 05:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 8354023)
I'd say you're in the minority on that one. But, hey, your opinion's the only one that counts when you're the one buying the movie.

Everyone I know IRL liked 2 better.

Buck 02-06-2012 05:15 PM

And also

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 6742986)
I loved it.

Was great watching the first one right before it. Felt like the second one built on it, and like it's building towards more in the future, but it was a good movie all on its own.

And the post-credits scene...awesome.

:)

keg in kc 02-06-2012 05:36 PM

That's the difference in an excited midnight screening and then watching it again months later. Unfortunately, it didn't hold up very well on repeat viewing.

Either way, like I said, your own opinion is the only one that really counts. You're the one buying it.

ThaVirus 02-06-2012 10:56 PM

Oh shoot, I should have known about the movie rights. Well that blows, but whatever. They could still have Luke Cage make some kind of cameo. Somehow, someway!

Quote:

Originally Posted by Valiant (Post 8353895)
I hope not.. I do not want them x3'ing the movie with too much..

I don't need a whole lot, just something like Wolverine's cameo in X Men: First Class; that was great. Or even just a mention of his name or something. I remember in X2 when Mystique was going through Stryker's computer system she came across a list of mutant names and Remy LeBeau (Gambit) was one, I thought that was pretty cool. You gotta throw a bone to the nerds out there.

007 02-07-2012 01:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 8354023)
I'd say you're in the minority on that one. But, hey, your opinion's the only one that counts when you're the one buying the movie.

I'm with you. I liked the first Iron Man better than the follow-up. Of course, I also like Batman begins better than The Dark Knight. Thats not to say IM2 and DK were not great films though.

keg in kc 02-29-2012 11:31 AM

Amazing new trailer:

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/NPoHPNeU9fc" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

kaplin42 02-29-2012 12:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 8407501)
Amazing new trailer:

I'm in!


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:31 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.