He'd probably never see the field with the staff we had in place.

That is just perfect.

No, according to this thread, we traded for Baldwin for Kaepernick.

Actually this makes no sense.

Kaepernick want taken in our spot.
Posted via Mobile Device

How bout that Kaeper-keeper?!


Alright I need to go walk that one off

True, but does it matter all that much to the end result?

This is a case where it's technically true, but the Broncos didn't trade the pick with the intention of giving up the player. That's why I think it was a poor thread. Like my earlier example showed, did the panthers trade darelle revis, or did they trade the pick with the intention of getting more picks?

By that logic, you're effectively trading away any single player you don't choose while acquiring the one you do with your given pick.

Eh, **** it. Agree to disagree

Interesting. I just posted in another thread laughing about how Denver overspent for a 2 year old man when they could have had Russell Wilson too. So glad Pioli pissed off Peyton...

When you see him on interviews, Kaepernick reminds of me one of those little kids with that aging disease. He always wears a hat that's too big, and then he has kind of a big nose and close-set eyes. I think he's really five years old and everyone just assumes that he's NFL-eligible.

Or get "fixed" by better coaching. He's not a bust until he busts under this coaching staff.

Using a pick that high (no. 36) for a quarterback is risky and reckless, especially when you trade for that pick. It's much safer to use high picks for offensive line depth.

Regards,

Scott DickHeadedPrickBalls

You're te only person making this idiotic point. Again, your argument makes more sense if they did it this year with Peyton already signed. But they can and should be 2nd guessed for SF swiping Kaep with their pick when they had crap on their roster.

You completely missed my point, which has nothing to do with Peyton Manning.

"End result" has nothing to do with PM. The "end result" is passing on Kaep for Baldwin (in our case), and trading the pick where Kaep was taken(in denver's case). Thus, not having Kaepernick is the end result.

Do I really have to spoon feed you the point in order for you to understand it?

Nice