ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Media Center (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Video Games Report: Microsoft to remove DRM/Always Online for the Xbox1 (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=273953)

Quesadilla Joe 06-19-2013 02:25 PM

Report: Microsoft to remove DRM/Always Online for the Xbox1
 
This could be the biggest backtrack in gaming history: Microsoft will reverse course on their DRM policies for Xbox One, dropping their Internet requirements and all restrictions on used games, according to the websites WhatHiFi and GiantBomb.

According to both reports, the announcement will be made today.

Citing multiple sources, GiantBomb says Microsoft has decided to remove a laundry list of Xbox One restrictions that customers considered negative:

No more always online requirement
The console no longer has to check in every 24 hours
All game discs will work on Xbox One as they do on Xbox 360
Authentication is no longer necessary
An Internet connection is only required when initially setting up the console
All downloaded games will function the same when online or offline
No additional restrictions on trading games or loaning discs
Region locks have been dropped



Since they revealed the Xbox One in May, Microsoft has faced non-stop criticism for announced policies that could drastically change the way we play games in the future. The Xbox One, they said, would require players to connect to the Internet once every 24 hours in order to keep the box playing games. You would have to activate each game by registering it on the web before playing. The console would also restrict the way that game discs are traded, borrowed, and shared, limiting the number of people who could own and play each game, and restricting trade-ins on a publisher-by-publisher basis.

Microsoft has justified these policies by saying that these moves are consistent with a shift to digital seen on Steam, iTunes and other digital platforms.


By reversing on those policies, Microsoft calls a lot of things into question: what will become of the Xbox One's family sharing plan? Will publishers find other ways to block used games? And what of all the rhetoric of how "the bits"—the data on each game disc, rather than the discs themselves—are the future?

We've reached out to Microsoft for comment but have not heard back yet.

http://kotaku.com/microsoft-is-remov...ium=Socialflow

DMAC 06-19-2013 02:35 PM

Must have been all the

....................../´¯/)
....................,/¯../
.................../..../
............./´¯/'...'/´¯¯`·¸
........../'/.../..../......./¨¯\
........('(...´...´.... ¯~/'...')
.........\.................'...../
..........''...\.......... _.·´
............\..............(

Fish 06-19-2013 02:37 PM

LMAO.... so speaketh the peoples....

DanBecky 06-19-2013 02:44 PM

If it's true, smartest thing they could've done. Wait, not having those stupid restrictions in the first place would've been the smartest thing to do.

keg in kc 06-19-2013 02:45 PM

People will eventually realize that it doesn't matter, and that Sony long-term is aimed every bit as much towards the cycling out of physical media as Microsoft.

silver5liter 06-19-2013 02:49 PM

Awesome! They actually listened to the people.

aturnis 06-19-2013 02:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 9762831)
People will eventually realize that it doesn't matter, and that Sony long-term is aimed every bit as much towards the cycling out of physical media as Microsoft.

This is true, but ultimately you let the market move that way progressively and naturally. You don't force it's hand.

Now, if only they could get the Spy out of the living room...

QuikSsurfer 06-19-2013 02:59 PM

ROFL

007 06-19-2013 03:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aturnis (Post 9762858)
This is true, but ultimately you let the market move that way progressively and naturally. You don't force it's hand.

Now, if only they could get the Spy out of the living room...

Yep. Make that kinect optional.

Hays 06-19-2013 03:14 PM

Now maybe they will sell some consoles.
Reports are gamestop stores have no more xbox ones left for preorder.
Only can do it online now they are told.

source gamespot.com

HC_Chief 06-19-2013 03:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Guru (Post 9762873)
Yep. Make that kinect optional.

...or duct-tape the lens

Mother****erJones 06-19-2013 03:14 PM

ROFL **** you Microsoft. I'm sticking with Sony. If I was the guy on a submarine I'd shit on a 360 and mail it to that asshole. Arrogant asswhipes

007 06-19-2013 03:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HC_Chief (Post 9762880)
...or duct-tape the lens

Yes lets pay $100 extra for something most don't need nor want.

-King- 06-19-2013 03:27 PM

This will be good long term for them, but as far as the launch is concerned, I think the damage has already been done. The PS4 will blow it out of the water when they launch.

'Hamas' Jenkins 06-19-2013 03:32 PM

That's nice, but the mere fact that this even needed to be suggested to Microsoft is appalling. It's ridiculous that they could not see how offensive these ideas would be to their potential customers, but it also illuminates how little they think of them.

Bump 06-19-2013 03:32 PM

At least they finally admit something they did wrong and listened for once.

Still going PS4 anyways, my mind has been made up.

Not to mention, Playstation simply has better looking exclusive titles. **** Halo and GoW. I'm so mad I can't play The Last of Us, wish I woulda bought a PS3 but I'm not gonna go do that now.

Buck 06-19-2013 04:00 PM

Are they dropping the price too? None of that even matters if its still $100 more.

Which console do you think parents are going to buy their kids for Christmas if one is $100 cheaper?

007 06-19-2013 04:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buck (Post 9762991)
Are they dropping the price too? None of that even matters if its still $100 more.

Which console do you think parents are going to buy their kids for Christmas if one is $100 cheaper?

the problem is that they tied kinect to the console. If they hadn't done that, they could have sold it cheaper with kinect being an addon. They are banking on people loving something they didn't like in the last gen.

keg in kc 06-19-2013 04:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aturnis (Post 9762858)
This is true, but ultimately you let the market move that way progressively and naturally. You don't force it's hand.

Well, don't mistake what I was saying as any kind of support for Microsoft. It's more about being surprised that people in a general sense don't recognize where Sony is ultimately headed. Although I guess I shouldn't be. People as a group tend towards blindly following, especially when they have a chance to pick a perceived side and get that pack mentality going.

007 06-19-2013 04:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 9763064)
Well, don't mistake what I was saying as any kind of support for Microsoft. It's more about being surprised that people in a general sense don't recognize where Sony is ultimately headed. Although I guess I shouldn't be. People as a group tend towards blindly following, especially when they have a chance to pick a perceived side and get that pack mentality going.

We all know this is eventually what they are heading to but it needs to be gradual. Set it up so the consumer can slowly see some value in it over the long haul. Don't just make a drastic change the public isn't even close to ready for.

for instance, the family sharing library is a cool idea so roll that out for only for certain digital download games. Let people see how it will work and get accustomed to it. For that to work though they need to allow 2 users at a time though. The owner of the game should be able to play it when ever they want. Your 10"family" members can duke it out for the ONE other login available for it,.

MMXcalibur 06-19-2013 04:38 PM

They really had to do this. Microsoft was just getting eaten alive in the PR battle.

Buck 06-19-2013 04:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Guru (Post 9762999)
the problem is that they tied kinect to the console. If they hadn't done that, they could have sold it cheaper with kinect being an addon. They are banking on people loving something they didn't like in the last gen.

I'm pretty sure that camera doesn't cost them anywhere near $100 a console to put in. Even with it in there, I bet M$ cost per console is below $400.

Its a stupid gimmick anyways.

Deberg_1990 06-19-2013 04:49 PM

:clap:

WhitiE 06-19-2013 04:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buck (Post 9762991)
Are they dropping the price too? None of that even matters if its still $100 more.

Which console do you think parents are going to buy their kids for Christmas if one is $100 cheaper?

Probably the one that the kid cries and stomps his feet for

Bump 06-19-2013 05:01 PM

and didn't they tell that Angry Joe guy and some others that this was built from the ground up and was not possible to change?

But maybe they should change their title to the Xbox 180 now.

Also, with a game like The Last of Us (looks amazing, haven't played it) as a Sony exclusive. Everybody like me is sitting here sad because we can't play it, wishing that we would have bought a PS3. That's awfully good timing for an epic exclusive game to come out, in the midst of the console wars. That tells people that they should buy Sony for the exclusives, if nothing else.

I mean, what are Xbox's exclusives right now? Halo, GoW, Forza and Dance Dance Revolution? Who gives a shit about any of those? haha

well played Sony.

007 06-19-2013 05:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WhitiE (Post 9763151)
Probably the one that the kid cries and stomps his feet for

Not true. My kids wanted the xbox. I preordered the PS4. If they want to pool their money for a xbox that is on them.

WhitiE 06-19-2013 05:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bump (Post 9763165)
and didn't they tell that Angry Joe guy and some others that this was built from the ground up and was not possible to change?

But maybe they should change their title to the Xbox 180 now.

Also, with a game like The Last of Us (looks amazing, haven't played it) as a Sony exclusive. Everybody like me is sitting here sad because we can't play it, wishing that we would have bought a PS3. That's awfully good timing for an epic exclusive game to come out, in the midst of the console wars. That tells people that they should buy Sony for the exclusives, if nothing else.

I mean, what are Xbox's exclusives right now? Halo, GoW, Forza and Dance Dance Revolution? Who gives a shit about any of those? haha

well played Sony.

Ryse and titanfall look pretty good

007 06-19-2013 05:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bump (Post 9763165)
and didn't they tell that Angry Joe guy and some others that this was built from the ground up and was not possible to change?

But maybe they should change their title to the Xbox 180 now.

Also, with a game like The Last of Us (looks amazing, haven't played it) as a Sony exclusive. Everybody like me is sitting here sad because we can't play it, wishing that we would have bought a PS3. That's awfully good timing for an epic exclusive game to come out, in the midst of the console wars. That tells people that they should buy Sony for the exclusives, if nothing else.

I mean, what are Xbox's exclusives right now? Halo, GoW, Forza and Dance Dance Revolution? Who gives a shit about any of those? haha

well played Sony.

Yep, Major Nelson kind of chastised Joe for stating it would be easy for MS to drop the 24 hour restriction. Love the egg on his face.

kcxiv 06-19-2013 05:45 PM

i told ya they have a plan b and c and d! There will be more changes. Microsoft see's preorders from major retailers. They wanted to see whta they could get away with from gamers and well, not this. lol


We all seen this coming. It was just when would they go public with the news

Jerm 06-19-2013 05:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bump (Post 9763165)
I mean, what are Xbox's exclusives right now? Halo, GoW, Forza and Dance Dance Revolution? Who gives a shit about any of those? haha

well played Sony.

Uh they have TitanFall which looks absolutely incredible, Quantum Break, Ryse, Sunset Overdrive, Project Spark, and games that haven't even been announced yet like Black Tusk's secret game.

Sony will have awesome exclusives no doubt but so will MS...and right now it's not even close.

kcxiv 06-19-2013 06:03 PM

alot of us will get both systems. i will, but as of right now, its PS4 first.

Ill wait til MS drops the price some. Im like Guru now days. I just wait a bit then get the game when it drops to 20-30 bucks. lol Unless its a sports game

Quesadilla Joe 06-19-2013 06:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jerm (Post 9763316)
Uh they have TitanFall which looks absolutely incredible

It looks like Call of Duty with mechs. I wouldn't say it looks incredible, but it does look like it will be a fun MP game. It will come to the PS4 eventually.

DanBecky 06-19-2013 08:05 PM

That's bc Robert Bowling was involved, and he was pretty much the man behind MW3.

Quesadilla Joe 06-19-2013 08:09 PM

Quote:

Xbox One DRM Reversal Cuts Features, Requires One-Time Connection

You win some, you lose some. In changing its drastic Xbox One DRM policies today, Microsoft will actually be cutting some of the cooler features announced from the console. Everything's got a price, folks.

"There’s a few things we won’t be able to deliver as a result of this change," Marc Whitten, v.p. of Xbox Live told Kotaku, "One of the things we were very exicted about was 'wherever we go my games are always with me.' Now, of course, your physical games won’t show up that way. The content you bought digitally will. But you’ll have to bring your discs with you to have your games with you. Similarly, the sharing library [is something] we won’t be able to deliver at launch."

That means that two features are being cut, at least for now, from Microsoft's Xbox One plans. Microsoft's concept of having your full game library travel with you is gone.

Microsoft's offer to let you share Xbox One games with up to nine other "family" members is gone, too.

The play-your-games-from-anywhere feature had been tied to the idea that all Xbox One games must be installed to the system's 500GB harddrive in order to run. In theory, if you had registered the game online—a requirement that's also been dropped for disc games for the Xbox One—you'd then be able to play those games from any other console you were logged into. Now, with disc games not needing to be registered, you'd have to bring the disc with you to prove you had the rights to play the game on it.

Those sacrifices are the cost of the new DRM policy that, Whitten says, will give people an Xbox One experience with disc-based games that matches what they had on the Xbox 360. Games won't have to be registered online, and players won't have to connect to the Internet in a 24-hour period to play offline disc-based games. "The way to think about it is that it works the way it does with the Xbox 360," Whitten said. "You can give them, loan them, trade them, play them. They will work exactly as they do today."

It's clear that Microsoft was not planning to make these changes. Even though it's June and the console doesn't launch until November, Whitten said that Xbox One consumers will have to download a day-one patch to enable the Xbox One's offline mode. Presumably, without it, the console will still think it's living in the Xbox One era of E3 2013.

UPDATE: Microsoft clarifies that the planned day-one Xbox One update, which Whitten told me, will "complete some of the software that won’t be there," is actually not a result of today's DRM policy change. Rather, it was always planned and will simply be required for playing off-line, among other things. Not a patch, they say. But, yes, your new Xbox console would have to connect online once in order to do the things Microsoft described today. And then you can keep it offline and play games without re-connecting to the Internet forever.

Microsoft also announced today a loosening of the Xbox One's regional restrictions. "You could buy a console in any country and use it any country," Whitten said. "You can use any disc in that console."

How did Microsoft get their initial plans for the Xbox One so wrong? "We believe a lot in this digital future," Whitten said. "We believe it builds an amazing experience—the ability to have a broader sharing platform and my content coming with me, [but] what we heard is people still wanted more choice… they wanted the familiarity of the physical disc."

Microsoft is obviously doing a big flip-flop here, but is putting a proud face on it. And a grateful one. "The last thing I would say is, 'Thank you for the feedback.'" He wasn't addressing me. He was addressing you. Your voices really were heard.

NOTE: The original headline for this story "Surprise Xbox One DRM Reversal Requires Day One Patch, Cuts Features" was changed to clarify that the console's day-one update was not a result of today's DRM policy change.
http://kotaku.com/xbox-one-drm-rever...ium=Socialflow

Pants 06-19-2013 09:01 PM

Why are you bolding the obvious shit? The whole point of the DRM 24 hour check-in was to authenticate games. Did you think M$ was doing it for shits and giggles? No 24 hour check-in means you have to use the actual discs to authenticate the games just like you do now.

Demonpenz 06-19-2013 09:25 PM

I am a bit surprised. I thought they were going to force this shit and then drop a game that everyone has to have on us. Guess they didn't have that up their sleeve.

Gravedigger 06-19-2013 11:47 PM

One of the funniest videos is at E3 when they announce the price and there is a long hesitation before anyone starts clapping and Phil Spencer is just smiling like a jackass on stage waiting for it.

007 06-20-2013 12:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gravedigger (Post 9764075)
One of the funniest videos is at E3 when they announce the price and there is a long hesitation before anyone starts clapping and Phil Spencer is just smiling like a jackass on stage waiting for it.

Yep. That was funny as hell.

SnakeXJones 06-20-2013 12:26 AM

This system still offers me nothing and those shitty exclusive games are just shit Halo, GOW other then Titanfall nothing looks that great maybe Ryse but the timed button looks rather annoying like a rhythm game. I Admit I will buy this down the road but MS just keeps ****ing up with mistakes just like them choosing Dual-Layer over the ****ing blu-ray last time

AussieChiefsFan 06-20-2013 12:53 AM

They finally realized how much of a colossal failure of a console release it would have been.LMAO

New World Order 06-20-2013 01:38 AM

Still sticking with the ps4, they have the first party exclusives for every genre. I am not convinced Microsoft will keep putting out games, seems like they will revert to the old recipe which is throwing cash at third party developers, GOW and Halo.

007 06-20-2013 01:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by New World Order (Post 9764137)
Still sticking with the ps4, they have the first party exclusives for every genre. I am not convinced Microsoft will keep putting out games, seems like they will revert to the old recipe which is throwing cash at third party developers, GOW and Halo.

yep, Sony blows the walls off when it comes to exclusives. MS can't touch them.

silver5liter 06-20-2013 02:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Guru (Post 9764141)
yep, Sony blows the walls off when it comes to exclusives. MS can't touch them.

Meh, name some. I really don't see the major exclusives. they didn't show hardly any at e3

007 06-20-2013 02:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by silver5liter (Post 9764148)
Meh, name some. I really don't see the major exclusives. they didn't show hardly any at e3

Uncharted series
Last of Us
Infamous
Heavy Rain
LBP
Killzone
God of War


Their track record with exclusives is enough to keep me around. I have no doubt their exclusives with the new gen will again be better than anything MS has.

silver5liter 06-20-2013 02:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Guru (Post 9764149)
Uncharted series
Last of Us
Infamous
Heavy Rain
LBP
Killzone
God of War


Their track record with exclusives is enough to keep me around. I have no doubt their exclusives with the new gen will again be better than anything MS has.

Depends I guess. Im liking
Halo
GOW
Forza
Titanfall
Sunset overdrive
fable
State of decay

there's good exclusives on both. hard to say one beats the other

007 06-20-2013 02:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by silver5liter (Post 9764150)
Depends I guess. Im liking
Halo
GOW
Forza
Titanfall
Sunset overdrive
fable
State of decay

there's good exclusives on both. hard to say one beats the other

I used to love Halo and GOW but they just got stale for me. I haven't even finished Halo 4 and really have lost any desire to go back to it.

Don't like racing games hence why I left GT off my list. Never even heard of Sunset overdrive. What is that?

Canofbier 06-20-2013 06:38 AM

As a guy who has been a PC gamer for a long time (and hasn't owned a Playstation since the PS2 and never owned any Xbox), I always felt throughout this whole process that most opinions over the Xbone's online requirement and DRM policies were WAY overblown. It's good that they removed the restrictions, but I didn't think that a single one of them would have realistically had a negative impact on me.

It's funny how people are so passionately "for" or "against" one console or the other, IMO. It's better for the health of console gaming to A) have options and B) have solid competition. Fanboys of either system are ****ing annoying and are incredibly short-sighted for believing that one console is going to "LOL RAPE ROFLSTOMP U bundle of sticksZ" the other, especially considering the fact that both consoles are months away from even being released. Ugh.

keg in kc 06-20-2013 07:25 AM

I'm the same way as a PC gamer. I haven't bought a physical disk in years. I've played multiplayer games for literally decades, so needing a persistent internet connection is nothing that concerns me (nor is paying to access; "free to play" is I think one of the worst, most invasive trends in gaming these days - people pay more through online stores in these "free" games than we ever did in the early 00s... - they complain about $15/month and then buy literally hundreds of dollars worth of random packs to get things they want).

GordonGekko 06-20-2013 01:03 PM

Good move by MS, but still not done.

They need to get price competitive with Sony. Have an X1 package without Kinect for $400. They need to do this.

Mav 06-20-2013 01:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GordonGekko (Post 9764852)
Good move by MS, but still not done.

They need to get price competitive with Sony. Have an X1 package without Kinect for $400. They need to do this.

this post owns all for me. I agree. Again, for me, im waiting to see which one is better after about 6 months or so before buying.

silver5liter 06-20-2013 01:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Guru (Post 9764151)
I used to love Halo and GOW but they just got stale for me. I haven't even finished Halo 4 and really have lost any desire to go back to it.

Don't like racing games hence why I left GT off my list. Never even heard of Sunset overdrive. What is that?

Its a large world fps game. look up the e3 trailer, there isnt game play out yet. But its done by insomniac so im sure it will be fun.

Setsuna 06-20-2013 03:26 PM

It still costs more. Try again Micro$oft.

ChiefsLV 06-20-2013 04:19 PM

Last generation I started with the 360 and eventually bought a PS3, which I'm loving right now for all the free stuff from PS+. (I own a Vita too). This time around I'll be going PS4 first and likely buying an Xbox One later (friends). Also PC gamer too but will wait to upgrade till the hardware on these consoles becomes a little dated. Yeah it's a bit of a hobby for me.

SnakeXJones 06-20-2013 05:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Guru (Post 9764149)
Uncharted series
Last of Us
Infamous
Heavy Rain
LBP
Killzone
God of War


Their track record with exclusives is enough to keep me around. I have no doubt their exclusives with the new gen will again be better than anything MS has.

MLB The Show also

Bump 06-20-2013 06:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by silver5liter (Post 9764150)
Depends I guess. Im liking
Halo
GOW
Forza
Titanfall
Sunset overdrive
fable
State of decay

there's good exclusives on both. hard to say one beats the other

Halo = was cool in 2003
GoW = first one was cool, after that they were all money grabs
Forza = meh, I don't do racing games
Fable = that's pretty good, but not worth buying the xbox one for.

haven't played the rest.


But Last of Us looks ****ing sick and so does God of War, Kill Zone and Uncharted.

BryanBusby 06-20-2013 11:30 PM

Not going to pat Microsoft on the back for this. I am more likely to buy an Xbone once the price drops on it though.

E: Looks like the whole family share thing was just going to be a glorified demo lol nvm (Not even sure why they felt it was necessary to remove this)

007 06-21-2013 12:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BryanBusby (Post 9766570)
Not going to pat Microsoft on the back for this. I am more likely to buy an Xbone once the price drops on it though.

E: Looks like the whole family share thing was just going to be a glorified demo lol nvm (Not even sure why they felt it was necessary to remove this)

Got a link for that?

BryanBusby 06-21-2013 01:33 AM

Pastebin from a MS employee:

http://pastebin.com/TE1MWES2

Quote:

It’s 4am and I’m still up, some hours ago, we at Microsoft had to basically redact on our Always Online infrastructure and dream. Being part of the team that created the entire infrastructure to include the POS (point of sale) mechanisms I must say that I am extremely sad to see it removed. But the consumer knows what is best, I can place the blame on no one but us here at Microsoft. We didn’t do a good enough job explaining all the benefits that came with this new model. We spent too much of our time fighting against the negative impressions that many people in the media formed. I feel that if we spent less time on them and more time explaining the great features we had lined up and the ones in the pipes gamers and media alike would have aligned to our vision. That stated, we felt the people we would have loss would have been made up by the people we would have gained. We have 48 million Xbox 360 users connected online nearly 24 hours a day. That is much more than any of our closet competitors and vastly more than Steam. The people that we would have left behind I feel would have eventually come around as they saw what advantages the platform had to offer. But as I previously stated we at Microsoft have no one to blame other than ourselves for failing to convince those hesitant to believe in our new system. Microsoft might be a big company, but we at the Xbox division have always been for the gamer. Everything we’ve done has always been for them, we have butt heads with the executives many times on what we’ve wanted to, some times we lost (removing the onboard processor from Kinect 1.0) and other times we’ve won (keeping Gears of War as an exclusive).

While publishers have never come right out to us at MS and say “We want you to do something about used gaming” we could hear it in their voices and read it in their numerous public statements. The used gaming industry is slowly killing them and every attempt to slow down the bleeding was met with much resistance from the gaming community. I will admit that online passes were not well received nor were they well implemented, but I felt given time to mature it could have turned into something worth having as a gamer much like DLC (we went from pointless horse armor to amazing season passes like Borderlands 2!). Videogame development is a loss leader by definition and unlike other forms of media videogames only have one revenue stream and that is selling to you the gamer. So when you buy a game used you’re hurting developers much more than say a movie studio. Many gamers fail to realize this when they purchase these preowned games. It is impossible to continue to deliver movie like experiences at the current costs without giving up something in return. It’s what gamers want and expect, the best selling games are blockbusters, the highest rated are blockbusters, the most loved are blockbusters. How can developers continue to create these experiences if consumers refuse to support them? Many will argue the development system is broken, and I disagree. The development system is near broken, it’s used gaming that is broken, but regardless I think more emphasis on this from both us at Microsoft and publishers would have gone a long way in helping educate the gamer, but again it is us who dropped the ball in this regard for that we’re sorry.

Going back to Xbox One’s feature set, one of the features I was most proud of was Family Sharing. I’ve browsed many gaming forums and saw that many people were excited about it as well! That made my day the first time I saw gamers start to think of amazing experiences that could come from game sharing. It showed that my work resonated with the group for which I helped create it for. I will admit that I was not happy with how some of my fellow colleagues handled explaining the systems and many times pulled my hair out as I felt I could have done a better job explaining and selling the ideas to the press and public at large. I’m writing this for that reason, to explain to gamers how many of the features would have worked and how many of them will still work.

First is family sharing, this feature is near and dear to me and I truly felt it would have helped the industry grow and make both gamers and developers happy. The premise is simple and elegant, when you buy your games for Xbox One, you can set any of them to be part of your shared library. Anyone who you deem to be family had access to these games regardless of where they are in the world. There was never any catch to that, they didn’t have to share the same billing address or physical address it could be anyone. When your family member accesses any of your games, they’re placed into a special demo mode. This demo mode in most cases would be the full game with a 15-45 minute timer and in some cases an hour. This allowed the person to play the game, get familiar with it then make a purchase if they wanted to. When the time limit was up they would automatically be prompted to the Marketplace so that they may order it if liked the game. We were toying around with a limit on the number of times members could access the shared game (as to discourage gamers from simply beating the game by doing multiple playthroughs). but we had not settled on an appropriate way of handling it. One thing we knew is that we wanted the experience to be seamless for both the person sharing and the family member benefiting. There weren’t many models of this system already in the wild other than Sony’s horrendous game sharing implementation, but it was clear their approach (if one could call it that) was not the way to go. Developers complained about the lost sales and gamers complained about overbearing DRM that punished those who didn’t share that implemented by publishers to quell gamers from taking advantage of a poorly thought out system. We wanted our family sharing plan to be something that was talked about and genuinely enjoyed by the masses as a way of inciting gamers to try new games.

The motto around the offices for the family plan was “It’s the console gaming equivalent to spotify and pandora” it was a social network within itself! The difference between the family sharing and the typical store demo is that your progress is saved as if it was the full game, and the data that was installed for that shared game doesn’t need to be erased when they purchase the full game! It gave incentive to share your games among your peers, it gave games exposure, it allowed old games to still generate revenue for publishers. At the present time we’re no longer going forward with it, but it is not completely off the table. It is still possible to implement this with the digital downloaded versions of games, and in fact that’s the plan still as far as I’m aware.

Another feature that we didn’t speak out about was the fact we were building a natural social network with Xbox One in itself that didn’t require gamers to open their laptops/tablets to post to their other friends nor did they need to wrestle with keyboard add-ons. Each Xbox Live account would have a full “home space” in which they could post their highest scores, show off their best Game DVR moments, what they’ve watched via Xbox TV and leave messages for others to read and respond to. Kinect 2.0 and Xbox One work together and has robust voice to text capabilities. The entire notion of communicating with friends you met online would have been natural and seamless. No reliance on Facebook, or Twitter (though those are optional for those who want them). Everything is perfectly crafted for the Xbox One controller and Kinect 2.0 and given that shine that only Microsoft can provide.

We at Microsoft have amazing plans for Xbox One that will make it an amazing experience for both gamers and entertainment consumers alike. I stand by the belief that Playstation 4 is Xbox 360 part 2, while Xbox One is trying to revolutionize entertainment consumption. For people who don’t want these amazing additions, like Don said we have a console for that and it’s called Xbox 360.
Time limited was confirmed by cboat.

jd1020 06-21-2013 01:43 AM

ROFL

That family share plan sounded great until you learned that it was just 15-45 min demos and then you get to go buy the game... what a joke.

All of those great restrictions people will be missing out on... stupid consumers!!!!

007 06-21-2013 05:06 AM

So, family sharing was just a ridiculous time limited pseudo rental system eh? What a friggin joke and disappointment. Yes, lets kill the used market and the rental market as well as force the consumer to pay full price for 6-12 month old games. LMAO

Love how they even dogged on Steam as well as shit talking PS4 when PS4 did exactly what gamers wanted and forced XBOX to do what gamers wanted as well.

Demonpenz 06-21-2013 06:06 AM

I think the options were explained well, then the consumers explained what they wanted.

Quesadilla Joe 06-21-2013 02:23 PM

Now there are rumors floating around that the Kinect will not be required for the Xbone anymore but they aren't planning on lowering the price.

http://www.examiner.com/article/rumo...one-price-drop

ModSocks 06-21-2013 02:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BryanBusby (Post 9766631)
Pastebin from a MS employee:

http://pastebin.com/TE1MWES2



Time limited was confirmed by cboat.

Clearly this guy doesn't understand what the consumers were upset about. And telling us that the Family share is nothing more than a 15-45min Demo is suppose to make us feel better? WTF?

Setsuna 06-21-2013 02:53 PM

Nothing they could do would make me buy their system before the PS4 at this point.

jd1020 06-21-2013 03:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cassel>Manning (Post 9767450)
Now there are rumors floating around that the Kinect will not be required for the Xbone anymore but they aren't planning on lowering the price.

http://www.examiner.com/article/rumo...one-price-drop

Well now that makes perfect sense!

There is no way they would get away with selling an inferior spec'd system than the PS4 for $100 more without the addition of Kinect.

EDIT: After clicking the link he updated with a response from Microsoft...

Quote:

"This rumor is untrue and was an unfortunate copy/paste mistake by a member of our team. We’d greatly appreciate you running the correction below as an update to your story to help quell this rumor and shutdown the false cycle."

Mother****erJones 06-21-2013 03:47 PM

No way I'm getting xsnatch one. Bullshit. **** Microsoft ima spend about $700 on ps4 and games and controller. Can't wait

Pants 06-21-2013 08:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mother****erJones (Post 9767617)
No way I'm getting xsnatch one. Bullshit. **** Microsoft ima spend about $700 on ps4 and games and controller. Can't wait

Are you always this emotional about everything? ROFL

Mother****erJones 06-21-2013 08:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pants (Post 9768072)
Are you always this emotional about everything? ROFL

Not emotional. Just not gona buy their bullshit. How is that emotional?

Pants 06-21-2013 09:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mother****erJones (Post 9768110)
Not emotional. Just not gona buy their bullshit. How is that emotional?

I wasn't talking about your decision, only the expression of it.

aturnis 06-21-2013 10:43 PM

Sunset Overdrive looks pretty Meh, and you'd be saying the same if it were a PS4 exclusive. Playstation exclusives rock. Naughty Dog, 'nuf said.

Bump 06-21-2013 10:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aturnis (Post 9768272)
Sunset Overdrive looks pretty Meh, and you'd be saying the same if it were a PS4 exclusive. Playstation exclusives rock. Naughty Dog, 'nuf said.

ya I'm pretty excited. Really wish I had a PS3 right now, Last of Us just looks like the game I want to play :(

007 06-21-2013 11:27 PM

I guess the Sony Store had a price mistake earlier today on the other anticipated title Two Souls. It was up there for $35 for a short time. Wish I had seen it.

My Last of Us disk arrives on Tuesday. Can't. Friggin. Wait.

Quesadilla Joe 06-21-2013 11:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bump (Post 9768294)
ya I'm pretty excited. Really wish I had a PS3 right now, Last of Us just looks like the game I want to play :(

I'm sure it will be available to download on the PS4 once they get their cloud streaming service worked out.

New World Order 06-22-2013 04:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cassel>Manning (Post 9768325)
I'm sure it will be available to download on the PS4 once they get their cloud streaming service worked out.



I believe that is coming next year, I also hope they put up the Uncharted series as I have not had a chance to play that either.

007 06-22-2013 04:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by New World Order (Post 9769142)
I believe that is coming next year, I also hope they put up the Uncharted series as I have not had a chance to play that either.

I'm curious if they will find a way for people that already own those ps3 games to forgo having to pay for it again on PS4. Not holding my breath but it sure would be nice.

Quesadilla Joe 06-22-2013 04:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by New World Order (Post 9769142)
I believe that is coming next year, I also hope they put up the Uncharted series as I have not had a chance to play that either.

You'd figure that every PS exclusive would be available for download.

New World Order 06-22-2013 04:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cassel>Manning (Post 9769182)
You'd figure that every PS exclusive would be available for download.



Hopefully. Uncharted series, Last of Us, next gen Mlb The Show and EA Sports UFC.

It's going to be a beautiful spring.

007 06-22-2013 04:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by New World Order (Post 9769202)
Hopefully. Uncharted series, Last of Us, next gen Mlb The Show and EA Sports UFC.

It's going to be a beautiful spring.

haven't they already said all PS3 games will be available on it?

aturnis 06-22-2013 04:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Guru (Post 9769150)
I'm curious if they will find a way for people that already own those ps3 games to forgo having to pay for it again on PS4. Not holding my breath but it sure would be nice.

It'd be nice if you could insert your PS disc's all the way back to PSone, to verify that you own it, then have it available in your cloud library.

Wallcrawler 06-22-2013 05:38 PM

If I can only get one of them, Im going with Sony this time around.

I had both an original XBOX and PS2, but had to ditch Sony when they came out with that bullshit 600 dollar pricetag on the PS3. Ive been with Microsoft since, and Ive been happy with the product. There were games I wished that I could play that were exclusive to Sony, sure, but for the most part Microsoft has fulfilled my gaming needs.

This bullshit they tried to pull here, this always connected DRM crap, its just wrong. Not being able to buy or rent games notwithstanding, its extremely common for my internet to be out for days at a time. During this period, the XB1 becomes a brick. Its completely worthless.

Throw in there that I would now have to take great pains to research the hell out of any game that I would consider buying, because Im no longer able to rent or borrow the game, that's just a dealbreaker. Im just supposed to drop 65 bucks on faith? Its pretty rare that the games out there live up to that pricetag. Not being able to resell or trade in the game is ridiculous.

Don Mattrick is the closest thing to a talking bag of smashed assholes that I have ever seen. I cannot believe that someone so clueless and out of touch with the consumer base's wants and needs could be promoted to his position in the company.

"If you don't have internet, we have a product for you. Its called the XBOX 360."

**** you, Don Mattrick. Sincerely, the rest of the world.


The dealbreaker for me is this. MS are not removing the DRM components from the console. They are simply going to release a patch that will bypass it the first time you set it up. You must have internet to set it up, or again, its a 500 dollar brick.

Who's to say that once you've signed the new ToS agreement with them, they don't just re-institute their original policies once they have your initial purchase money?

Clearly they are pissed off about having to make changes, because they've removed family sharing as backlash for consumers not buying into their bullshit.

Sony never planned to do this from the outset, and from the look of things the PS4 is geared toward being a game machine first and foremost anyway. Im going with them first, and then if I have the cash, I might pick up an XB1 down the road once MS proves they can be trusted.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:28 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.