ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Williamson: Early AFC West Salary Cap Check... (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=268632)

DaWolf 01-08-2013 05:11 PM

Williamson: Early AFC West Salary Cap Check...
 
Quote:

Early AFC West salary-cap check
January, 8, 2013
By Bill Williamson | ESPN.com

The focus is on 2013 for all but eight teams in the NFL.

Teams will soon be readying for free agency. To get a feel for what teams will have to spend in free agency, ESPN’s John Clayton has the current salary-cap numbers.

Please remember all salary-cap numbers are fluid and things change. But this gives you a working idea of where each team stands.

In the AFC West, the best team is in the best cap standing. The Broncos, who host Baltimore on Saturday in the divisional playoff round, are $18.5 million under the cap. They should be able to add some solid pieces if they wish. They do have to either extend or give the franchise tag to standout left tackle Ryan Clady. That will take up some space.

The Chiefs continue to be in good cap health. It is $16.1 million under the cap. It has free agents, receiver Dwayne Bowe, left tackle Branden Albert and punter Dustin Colquitt, to deal with. I think Albert and Colquitt are more likely to return to Kansas City at this point, but it has flexibility.

San Diego is $8.7 million under the cap. It should be enough to get a couple of starters. The Chargers need the most help on the offensive line.

Meanwhile, Oakland is one of 10 teams currently over the salary cap. Oakland is $4.5 million over the cap. It was severely over the cap last season. This year, the Raiders, who will have to address punter Shane Lechler, tight end Brandon Myers and linebacker Philip Wheeler in free agency, will still have to make a lot of tough decisions and will have to tweak some contracts again. But they should be able to do a little more than they did last
http://espn.go.com/blog/afcwest/post...lary-cap-check

http://espn.go.com/nfl/playoffs/2012...t-cap-strategy

O.city 01-08-2013 05:12 PM

If the Raiders release Big Dic Seymour, grab him up.

The Franchise 01-08-2013 05:13 PM

$16.1 million under the cap BEFORE we release Tyson Jackson and Matt Cassel. We'll be in fine shape.

Pasta Little Brioni 01-08-2013 05:13 PM

Faid so full of fail once again.

DaWolf 01-08-2013 05:14 PM

Can't believe the Bengals have $55 mil of cap space. Those numbers are going to change after the season is over and bonuses and incentives kick in...

DJ's left nut 01-08-2013 05:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 9297303)
$16.1 million under the cap BEFORE we release Tyson Jackson and Matt Cassel. We'll be in fine shape.

And if they are able to extend Bowe or Albert (rather than tag them), their cap figures would actually go down.

This team could really do some damage in FA this off-season if it wanted to.

O.city 01-08-2013 05:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 9297313)
And if they are able to extend Bowe or Albert (rather than tag them), their cap figures would actually go down.

This team could really do some damage in FA this off-season if it wanted to.

What are you thinking?


Who should we target?

BlackHelicopters 01-08-2013 05:17 PM

Hopefully we will spend wisely.

Buehler445 01-08-2013 05:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 9297313)
And if they are able to extend Bowe or Albert (rather than tag them), their cap figures would actually go down.

This team could really do some damage in FA this off-season if it wanted to.

They goddamn better sign Albert and Bowe.

You have to think Bowe is excited to play for Reid, and also that that ****ing scumbag Pioli is gone.

**** Pioli. Seriously. How the **** do you not sign Bowe? He's the best WR we've had in 30 years. Sign him to his second ****ing contract. Or everyone dies.

Hammock Parties 01-08-2013 05:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 9297314)
What are you thinking?


Who should we target?

FS Jairus Byrd
LG Andy Levitre
CB Sam Shields
WR Greg Jennings

We get two of those guys it would be fantastic. They will all get big money.

O.city 01-08-2013 05:20 PM

Byrd and Shields would be great gets, and I'd rather spend a pick on Maclin or Harvin than Jennings at this point.

The Franchise 01-08-2013 05:20 PM

I don't know if we have a legitimate shot at Byrd.....but I would take Goldson as a consolation prize.

RunKC 01-08-2013 05:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoWalrus (Post 9297324)
FS Jairus Byrd
LG Andy Levitre
CB Sam Shields
WR Greg Jennings

We get two of those guys it would be fantastic. They will all get big money.

Is Sam Shields really good? Idk much about him.

The Franchise 01-08-2013 05:22 PM

I'd rather have Sean Smith.

scho63 01-08-2013 05:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 9297303)
$16.1 million under the cap BEFORE we release Tyson Jackson and Matt Cassel. We'll be in fine shape.

I'm confused when we need to pay Tyson the huge salary-I thought it was in 2014 not 2013

Hammock Parties 01-08-2013 05:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 9297334)
Is Sam Shields really good? Idk much about him.

He allowed a lower percentage of receptions than Brandon Flowers. And he only gave up 21 catches all year.

He's a stud, and only 25.

I also just realized he's a RFA so we're probably not gonna get him.

The Franchise 01-08-2013 05:27 PM

Jarius Byrd or Dashon Goldson
Sean Smith
Andy Levitre

-King- 01-08-2013 05:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 9297337)
I'd rather have Sean Smith.

Hes either getting franchised or getting a big money deal from the dolphins.
Posted via Mobile Device

BigMeatballDave 01-08-2013 05:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoWalrus (Post 9297324)
WR Greg Jennings

Arrowhead isn't a dome.

The Franchise 01-08-2013 05:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 9297348)
Hes either getting franchised or getting a big money deal from the dolphins.
Posted via Mobile Device

Over Jake Long?

Hammock Parties 01-08-2013 05:29 PM

Sean Smith is not good, BTW.

He was really bad in 2011 (I learned the hard way, because he was on my Sandbox team), and improved only marginally this season.

ShowtimeSBMVP 01-08-2013 05:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 9297355)
Over Jake Long?

Fins are 47m under. I think they lock up both.

Hammock Parties 01-08-2013 05:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave (Post 9297354)
Arrowhead isn't a dome.

I dunno what this means, but if Dorsey is our GM I bet we go after Jennings, because Dorsey drafted Jennings.

-King- 01-08-2013 05:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 9297355)
Over Jake Long?

I read they don't want him back. And hes a barely above average LT right now so hes not a priority.
Posted via Mobile Device

BigMeatballDave 01-08-2013 05:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoWalrus (Post 9297365)
I dunno what this means,

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap100...play-in-a-dome

DaneMcCloud 01-08-2013 05:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 9297328)
Byrd and Shields would be great gets, and I'd rather spend a pick on Maclin or Harvin than Jennings at this point.

Spending picks on veterans should be absolutely out of the question this season.

The Chiefs choose either #1 or #2 in each round, in addition to the additional 3rd rounder (which cannot be traded) for Carr.

They need to load up on young talent, not trade it away.

KC Dan 01-08-2013 05:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9297375)
Spending picks on veterans should be absolutely out of the question this season.

The Chiefs choose either #1 or #2 in each round, in addition to the additional 3rd rounder (which cannot be traded) for Carr.

They need to load up on young talent, not trade it away.

This!

O.city 01-08-2013 05:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9297375)
Spending picks on veterans should be absolutely out of the question this season.

The Chiefs choose either #1 or #2 in each round, in addition to the additional 3rd rounder (which cannot be traded) for Carr.

They need to load up on young talent, not trade it away.

You wouldn't trade the second pick in teh second round for Harvin?

DaneMcCloud 01-08-2013 05:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 9297378)
You wouldn't trade the second pick in teh second round for Harvin?

**** no.

He's missed games due to migraines and injuries. He's unreliable. I'd rather take a chance in the draft or free agency before giving up a pick, ESPECIALLY pick number 34.

That's absurd.

NJChiefsFan 01-08-2013 05:36 PM

I'm not a fan of getting Jennings, considering the age and cost. I would love to see us get Byrd though.

ShowtimeSBMVP 01-08-2013 05:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 9297378)
You wouldn't trade the second pick in teh second round for Harvin?


No maybe a 4th.

RunKC 01-08-2013 05:42 PM

I think this team desperately needs some veterans, but not in the draft.

Bring in 3 or 4 vets in FA and then inject the team with youth through the draft.

BigMeatballDave 01-08-2013 05:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsandO'sfan (Post 9297386)
No maybe a 4th.

ROFL Yeah, I'm sure that'll get him.

Nightfyre 01-08-2013 05:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave (Post 9297402)
ROFL Yeah, I'm sure that'll get him.

Injury and coachability concerns have harpooned trade value before. I'm not saying a fourth will get him, but it really wouldn't surprise me, frankly, if the vikings are tired of his shit.

Pasta Little Brioni 01-08-2013 05:46 PM

They'd be dumb as shit to deal him for that.

DJ's left nut 01-08-2013 05:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 9297314)
What are you thinking?


Who should we target?

Albert and Bowe at all costs. Get them back.

We desperately need another safety. At this point I don't care if it's FS or SS, just get someone in here to make Lewis what he should be - a nice depth safety.

An established interior lineman, ideally a center. You'll also want at least one versatile backup as well.

I don't like the CB market; it's overpriced and looking very mediocre this year so I think you're a little hamstrung there. Any 'box' players would require knowing the defense we prefer first.

And I think you use the rest to extend a trade target. You go after Harvin or Maclin and sign them long-term.

notorious 01-08-2013 05:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 9297303)
$16.1 million under the cap BEFORE we release Tyson Jackson and Matt Cassel. We'll be in fine shape.

This.

How much will space will be added when we flush those turds?

ShowtimeSBMVP 01-08-2013 05:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave (Post 9297402)
ROFL Yeah, I'm sure that'll get him.



ESPN Twin Cities reports Percy Harvin and coach Leslie Frazier had yet another heated exchange that likely contributed to the receiver being placed on injured reserve earlier this month.
It's the third documented issue with Harvin and the organization since June. The exchange is believed to have begun in the training room and has fueled speculation that the "deteriorating" relationship between the two men could lead to Harvin's exit from Minnesota. Seeking a new contract and frustrated with the identity of the Vikings offense, Harvin briefly issued a trade request last offseason. The team will have to decide whether to offer him a long-term deal heavy on performance-based incentives and escalators or prepare to shop him in March and April. One NFL personnel man estimates that Harvin would draw a second- or third-round pick in a contract year.


Plus he's missed games the last 2 years. No team is gonna give them a 2nd round pick.

NJChiefsFan 01-08-2013 05:49 PM

How come Denver is referred to as "they" and we are referred to as "it"?

Rude.

RunKC 01-08-2013 05:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 9297418)
Albert and Bowe at all costs. Get them back.

We desperately need another safety. At this point I don't care if it's FS or SS, just get someone in here to make Lewis what he should be - a nice depth safety.

An established interior lineman, ideally a center.
You'll also want at least one versatile backup as well.

I don't like the CB market; it's overpriced and looking very mediocre this year so I think you're a little hamstrung there. Any 'box' players would require knowing the defense we prefer first.

And I think you use the rest to extend a trade target. You go after Harvin or Maclin and sign them long-term.

I agree with everything but this. Rodney Hudson was the most decorated OL at FSU for a reason.

He's gonna be a very solid C for years.

BigMeatballDave 01-08-2013 05:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsandO'sfan (Post 9297424)
ESPN Twin Cities reports Percy Harvin and coach Leslie Frazier had yet another heated exchange that likely contributed to the receiver being placed on injured reserve earlier this month.
It's the third documented issue with Harvin and the organization since June. The exchange is believed to have begun in the training room and has fueled speculation that the "deteriorating" relationship between the two men could lead to Harvin's exit from Minnesota. Seeking a new contract and frustrated with the identity of the Vikings offense, Harvin briefly issued a trade request last offseason. The team will have to decide whether to offer him a long-term deal heavy on performance-based incentives and escalators or prepare to shop him in March and April. One NFL personnel man estimates that Harvin would draw a second- or third-round pick in a contract year.


Plus he's missed games the last 2 years. No team is gonna give them a 2nd round pick.

I'd be surprised if it only took a 4th for him.

Not interested though. Misses too many games.

SAUTO 01-08-2013 05:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PGM (Post 9297414)
They'd be dumb as shit to deal him for that.

IMO we would be dumb as shit to give up that.
Posted via Mobile Device

BigMeatballDave 01-08-2013 05:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 9297427)
I agree with everything but this. Rodney Hudson was the most decorated OL at FSU for a reason.

He's gonna be a very solid C for years.

Good. Play him at G. The position he PLAYED HIS ENTIRE CAREER AT FSU.

DJ's left nut 01-08-2013 05:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9297375)
Spending picks on veterans should be absolutely out of the question this season.

The Chiefs choose either #1 or #2 in each round, in addition to the additional 3rd rounder (which cannot be traded) for Carr.

They need to load up on young talent, not trade it away.

Maclin and Harvin are both 24 - how are either of them not 'young talent'?

Those are exactly the kinds of guys you would be willing to give away a good pick for. No, you don't give a pick up for a guy like Jennings, but both Harvin and Maclin have 5+ years left in their primes. And they're sure-fire NFL contributors. They've gone through the WR learning curve (which is surprisingly steep) and they fit our need across from Bowe perfectly.

Look, I know we want to stockpile talent and getting rid of picks hurts, but even the best GMs bat .500 on a good day. If you could trade a 2nd rounder for a guy like Harvin or a 3rd for Maclin, you're getting exactly what you're asking for - young talent.

Or you could keep them and get young...something. Maybe it's young talent, maybe it's young roster fodder. It's almost certainly not going to be better than Harvin and the odds suggest it not being better than Maclin.

SAUTO 01-08-2013 05:54 PM

Harvin has major head concerns.

Migrane AND crazy
Posted via Mobile Device

SAUTO 01-08-2013 05:55 PM

Harvin also choke slammed a coach in college.
Posted via Mobile Device

DJ's left nut 01-08-2013 05:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 9297427)
I agree with everything but this. Rodney Hudson was the most decorated OL at FSU for a reason.

He's gonna be a very solid C for years.

Maybe he will, maybe he won't. We don't know what his knee will bounce back as and he was playing pretty poorly before the injury.

Bring in an established C and then if Hudson comes back healthy, he can play G, where we know he's familiar. At that point you have some versatility if the C gets hurt or loses effectiveness.

If you just bring in a veteran G and Hudson struggles again or doesn't recover from his knee injury that well, you're up shits creek. For the sake of versatility and as a CYA maneuver, I think the interior lineman has to be capable of playing C.

DaneMcCloud 01-08-2013 05:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 9297436)
Maclin and Harvin are both 24 - how are either of them not 'young talent'?

Those are exactly the kinds of guys you would be willing to give away a good pick for. No, you don't give a pick up for a guy like Jennings, but both Harvin and Maclin have 5+ years left in their primes. And they're sure-fire NFL contributors. They've gone through the WR learning curve (which is surprisingly steep) and they fit our need across from Bowe perfectly.

Look, I know we want to stockpile talent and getting rid of picks hurts, but even the best GMs bat .500 on a good day. If you could trade a 2nd rounder for a guy like Harvin or a 3rd for Maclin, you're getting exactly what you're asking for - young talent.

Or you could keep them and get young...something. Maybe it's young talent, maybe it's young roster fodder. It's almost certainly not going to be better than Harvin and the odds suggest it not being better than Maclin.

Harvin's a ****ball and Maclin, IMO, is nothing special.

There's no ****ing way I'd give up the #34 or the #77 for either. Maybe the 4th rounder (somewhere around #110, after the compensatory picks) for Maclin but even then, that pick could provide depth on the interior line or a starting ILB.

Either way, I'm not a fan.

Nightfyre 01-08-2013 05:58 PM

Maclin may be available in free agency. He is not worth the franchise tag.

DJ's left nut 01-08-2013 06:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 9297443)
Harvin has major head concerns.

Migrane AND crazy
Posted via Mobile Device

And even when he was a disgruntled asshole, he was putting up MVP numbers in Minn.

I'm tired of worrying about choir boys. Talent wins in this league and Harvin's as talented as all but maybe 6-8 WRs in the league. People said the same shit about Brandon Marshall but when he got his deal and a little age on him, he's matured into one of the most dynamic playmakers out there.

"Hell no, I don't want that stabby malcontent...blah blah blah" - Oops, Marshall's actually a freakin' boss.

Harvin appears to be a guy that plays with a chip on his shoulder and it shows behind closed doors. He is not, however, a Diva on the field or in public. He has enough self control to keep that in-house for the most part (with leaks from within the Vikings organization making it public). That tells me he's not an unhinged guy, but rather someone that's unhappy with his contract situation and that's about it.

Give him his extension and, like Marshall, I think he straightens up and flies right.

The Migraines are a concern, but he does appear to have learned to cope/manage them well.

I just don't see why he's not worth a pick that has a 50% chance of being a bust and a virtual 100% chance of not being a better player than he is.

DJ's left nut 01-08-2013 06:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nightfyre (Post 9297456)
Maclin may be available in free agency. He is not worth the franchise tag.

Maclin's under contract for another year.

DaneMcCloud 01-08-2013 06:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 9297464)
I just don't see why he's not worth a pick that has a 50% chance of being a bust and a virtual 100% chance of not being a better player than he is.

Why is Maclin not worth a pick? Well, for one, he put up similar numbers in Philly to that of Steve Breaston (before 2012), with FAR shittier quarterbacks.

Why in the ****ing world would you want to give up a high pick for a guy that gets like 700-900 yards? That's ridiculous.

RunKC 01-08-2013 06:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 9297447)
Maybe he will, maybe he won't. We don't know what his knee will bounce back as and he was playing pretty poorly before the injury.

Bring in an established C and then if Hudson comes back healthy, he can play G, where we know he's familiar. At that point you have some versatility if the C gets hurt or loses effectiveness.

If you just bring in a veteran G and Hudson struggles again or doesn't recover from his knee injury that well, you're up shits creek. For the sake of versatility and as a CYA maneuver, I think the interior lineman has to be capable of playing C.

I agree. I think it would be very wise for us to draft a C with our 4th round pick. I think that Khaled Holmes or Graham Pocic would be a nice insurance policy and both should be there.

Then again, if Barrett Jones is there at 34, it would be extremely difficult to overlook him. That guy is going to be a pro bowler for years.

DJ's left nut 01-08-2013 06:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9297448)
Harvin's a ****ball and Maclin, IMO, is nothing special.

There's no ****ing way I'd give up the #34 or the #77 for either. Maybe the 4th rounder (somewhere around #110, after the compensatory picks) for Maclin but even then, that pick could provide depth on the interior line or a starting ILB.

Either way, I'm not a fan.

How confident are you that Stedman Bailey will be more productive than either of those guys over the next 5 years?

They're established, productive, NFL players with their prime years ahead of them and a ton of skill between them. Maclin was Bailey before Bailey (likely better). Harvin was Austin before Austin (definitely better). And they've both made the NFL transition that trips up so many guys.

Eh, to each their own. If I'm investing in a QB at 1.1 this year, I'm going to want an immediate #2 WR and deep threat alongside Bowe. The 2.1 for Harvin or Maclin essentially guarantees that.

Nightfyre 01-08-2013 06:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 9297465)
Maclin's under contract for another year.

I wonder why I thought he was a free agent... Well, I'd rather wait a year than give up a pick for him. Especially in a draft this deep in WR.

SAUTO 01-08-2013 06:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 9297464)
And even when he was a disgruntled asshole, he was putting up MVP numbers in Minn.

I'm tired of worrying about choir boys. Talent wins in this league and Harvin's as talented as all but maybe 6-8 WRs in the league. People said the same shit about Brandon Marshall but when he got his deal and a little age on him, he's matured into one of the most dynamic playmakers out there.

"Hell no, I don't want that stabby malcontent...blah blah blah" - Oops, Marshall's actually a freakin' boss.

Harvin appears to be a guy that plays with a chip on his shoulder and it shows behind closed doors. He is not, however, a Diva on the field or in public. He has enough self control to keep that in-house for the most part (with leaks from within the Vikings organization making it public). That tells me he's not an unhinged guy, but rather someone that's unhappy with his contract situation and that's about it.

Give him his extension and, like Marshall, I think he straightens up and flies right.

The Migraines are a concern, but he does appear to have learned to cope/manage them well.

I just don't see why he's not worth a pick that has a 50% chance of being a bust and a virtual 100% chance of not being a better player than he is.

he choke slammed a coach in college during practice.

He has fought with every NFL coach he has had.

He has migraine issues, he has had multiple other injuries.

Sorry I will pass.

And FTR I agree with you on choir boys, but this guy is out there
Posted via Mobile Device

DJ's left nut 01-08-2013 06:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9297469)
Why is Maclin not worth a pick? Well, for one, he put up similar numbers in Philly to that of Steve Breaston (before 2012), with FAR shittier quarterbacks.

Why in the ****ing world would you want to give up a high pick for a guy that gets like 700-900 yards? That's ridiculous.

His skills.

Granted, I'm a Mizzou fan, but do you remember Maclin in college and coming out? He was as electric as anyone out there. Those skills haven't deteriorated. He's still incredibly explosive in and out of his cuts and can get behind most secondaries.

I honestly think his problem in Philly is DeSean Jackson. They have Jackson running the routes that Maclin would be best at and they have Maclin running the patterns that you want someone like Bowe running. I think Maclin alongside Bowe would be one of the best #2 WRs in football and would provide a huge boost to everyone on the offense by spreading the field.

Bailey is not more physically gifted than Maclin - he just isn't. So I see nothing to suggest that Bailey would be better than Maclin at this level other than the unknown which captivates us every draft season.

Pasta Little Brioni 01-08-2013 06:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 9297434)
IMO we would be dumb as shit to give up that.
Posted via Mobile Device

You wouldn't give a 4th for Harvin?

DaneMcCloud 01-08-2013 06:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 9297478)
How confident are you that Stedman Bailey will be more productive than either of those guys over the next 5 years?

They're established, productive, NFL players with their prime years ahead of them and a ton of skill between them. Maclin was Bailey before Bailey (likely better). Harvin was Austin before Austin (definitely better). And they've both made the NFL transition that trips up so many guys.

Eh, to each their own. If I'm investing in a QB at 1.1 this year, I'm going to want an immediate #2 WR and deep threat alongside Bowe. The 2.1 for Harvin or Maclin essentially guarantees that.

So, Breaston and Baldwin aren't number 2 threats in Reid's offense? Wiley was fast as **** at The Combines and seems to have decent hands.

The Chiefs, IMO, have far greater needs with their high picks than a ****ing 2nd WR. They need a starter at CB, safety, ILB in addition to depth everywhere. I'd also like to see them take a developmental QB with their compensatory pick or their 4th rounder.

Maclin is a luxury the Chiefs can't afford this year. Plus, again, I don't think he's anything special. And **** Harvin.

Pasta Little Brioni 01-08-2013 06:08 PM

I'm with DJ nut. I'd be estatic to get either for a 3rd.

SAUTO 01-08-2013 06:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PGM (Post 9297490)
You wouldn't give a 4th for Harvin?


for done reason I thought the whole conversation was about the 2.2 pick.

I would probably give a 4
Posted via Mobile Device

DaneMcCloud 01-08-2013 06:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 9297489)
His skills.

Granted, I'm a Mizzou fan, but do you remember Maclin in college and coming out? He was as electric as anyone out there. Those skills haven't deteriorated. He's still incredibly explosive in and out of his cuts and can get behind most secondaries.

I honestly think his problem in Philly is DeSean Jackson. They have Jackson running the routes that Maclin would be best at and they have Maclin running the patterns that you want someone like Bowe running. I think Maclin alongside Bowe would be one of the best #2 WRs in football and would provide a huge boost to everyone on the offense by spreading the field.

Bailey is not more physically gifted than Maclin - he just isn't. So I see nothing to suggest that Bailey would be better than Maclin at this level other than the unknown which captivates us every draft season.

I don't care.

The Chiefs have far greater needs at #34 and #77 than to spend it on a receiver opposite Bowe, who I fully expect to be re-signed.

Pasta Little Brioni 01-08-2013 06:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 9297506)
for done reason I thought the whole conversation was about the 2.2 pick.

I would probably give a 4
Posted via Mobile Device

Yeah, my bad. I should have quoted ChefO's

SAUTO 01-08-2013 06:10 PM

I'm not really a mu fan but I would take Maclin
Posted via Mobile Device

DaneMcCloud 01-08-2013 06:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 9297506)
for done reason I thought the whole conversation was about the 2.2 pick.

I would probably give a 4
Posted via Mobile Device

There's no way I'd give a 4th rounder for Harvin. First off, his availability is unpredictable. He fights with his head coach and has an attitude. That's the last thing Andy Reid needs in his locker room, especially considering the failure the Chiefs have experienced over the past 4 years and will likely experience in 2013.

Titty Meat 01-08-2013 06:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 9297472)
I agree. I think it would be very wise for us to draft a C with our 4th round pick. I think that Khaled Holmes or Graham Pocic would be a nice insurance policy and both should be there.

Then again, if Barrett Jones is there at 34, it would be extremely difficult to overlook him. That guy is going to be a pro bowler for years.

Barrett Jones has a lisc franc injury.

SAUTO 01-08-2013 06:11 PM

And I agree that Jackson runs the routes Maclin should run and he would be a beast beside Bowe
Posted via Mobile Device

SAUTO 01-08-2013 06:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9297512)
There's no way I'd give a 4th rounder for Harvin. First off, his availability is unpredictable. He fights with his head coach and has an attitude. That's the last thing Andy Reid needs in his locker room, especially considering the failure the Chiefs have experienced over the past 4 years and will likely experience in 2013.

I can see your side of this too.

If the team REALLY checked him out and gave themselves an out in the contract I would be ok with a 4
Posted via Mobile Device

SAUTO 01-08-2013 06:13 PM

Didn't Harvin miss a PLAYOFF game because of the migraines?

I mean shit man...
Posted via Mobile Device

DJ's left nut 01-08-2013 06:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9297497)
So, Breaston and Baldwin aren't number 2 threats in Reid's offense? Wiley was fast as **** at The Combines and seems to have decent hands.

The Chiefs, IMO, have far greater needs with their high picks than a ****ing 2nd WR. They need a starter at CB, safety, ILB in addition to depth everywhere. I'd also like to see them take a developmental QB with their compensatory pick or their 4th rounder.

Maclin is a luxury the Chiefs can't afford this year. Plus, again, I don't think he's anything special. And **** Harvin.

Eh, could be.

I think the Chiefs can survive without Maclin or Harvin - sure. Pretty easily, in fact. But I'm also willing to do whatever possible to make things easier for a new QB.

Baldwin can't be counted on for anything, to be honest. I think Breaston might be a decent 3rd option, but I have a hard time seeing him step up as a #2 at 30 yrs old after never really being that before. Wiley's hands were garbage this year, he's too small and he sure doesn't play to his 40 time from what I've seen. Maybe he could be a slot option, but I'm inclined to not put too much stock into it.

I want to see the new QB and Reid's new attack approach succeed and I think a way to really give them the best shot is an establish young veteran WR.

Hammock Parties 01-08-2013 06:24 PM

Here we go with the Breaston debate again.

He's just fine as a #2. He proved that in 2011.

If we get Harvin he needs to play in the slot anyway.

JoeyChuckles 01-08-2013 06:27 PM

That sounds like enough money to lure Brett Favre out of retirement.

TribalElder 01-08-2013 06:30 PM

LOL @ the Raitards

Jiu Jitsu Jon 01-08-2013 09:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 9297301)
If the Raiders release Big Dic Seymour, grab him up.

Seymour will most definitely be gone. Raiders are gutting the roster and rebuilding it. No one will even recognize the guys on the team in a couple of years. Go ahead and sign him. He'll be too hurt to practice, but he'll suddenly recover in time for game day. Then, he'll make a play once every blue moon when he feels like it.

Chiefshrink 01-08-2013 10:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsandO'sfan (Post 9297424)
ESPN Twin Cities reports Percy Harvin and coach Leslie Frazier had yet another heated exchange that likely contributed to the receiver being placed on injured reserve earlier this month.
It's the third documented issue with Harvin and the organization since June. The exchange is believed to have begun in the training room and has fueled speculation that the "deteriorating" relationship between the two men could lead to Harvin's exit from Minnesota. Seeking a new contract and frustrated with the identity of the Vikings offense, Harvin briefly issued a trade request last offseason. The team will have to decide whether to offer him a long-term deal heavy on performance-based incentives and escalators or prepare to shop him in March and April. One NFL personnel man estimates that Harvin would draw a second- or third-round pick in a contract year.


Plus he's missed games the last 2 years. No team is gonna give them a 2nd round pick.

Not only a potato chip player(hurt all the time) but a 'drama queen' as well. NO thx !!

The draft this year is deep for good WR talent so screw Harvin and Jennings.

Chiefshrink 01-08-2013 10:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jiu Jitsu Jon (Post 9298374)
He'll be too hurt to practice, but he'll suddenly recover in time for game day. Then, he'll make a play once every blue moon when he feels like it.

Yep. Bellichek saw this coming years ago and raped you for it.:thumb:

mcaj22 01-08-2013 10:04 PM

yea but on paper there isnt going to be a WR that comes close to the numbers of Harvin or Jennings

Chiefshrink 01-08-2013 10:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 9297533)
Baldwin can't be counted on for anything, to be honest. Wiley's hands were garbage this year, he's too small and he sure doesn't play to his 40 time from what I've seen. Maybe he could be a slot option, but I'm inclined to not put too much stock into it.

Baldwin needs to be given a chance and truly be developed by some serious good WR coaching. I mean how do you get better with Cassel/Quinn and no offensive coaching worth a shit.

Reid will tell Wiley, "Son you have talent but your a pussy and need to "sack up" and stay healthy and find a pair hands if you are going to be on my team".

Chiefshrink 01-08-2013 10:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mcaj22 (Post 9298404)
yea but on paper there isnt going to be a WR that comes close to the numbers of Harvin or Jennings

Both Harvin and Jennings get hurt waaaaaaay too much for my liking and now it is apparent Harvin has an attitude. Both are talented as hell I'll give you that BUT....

DaneMcCloud 01-08-2013 10:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mcaj22 (Post 9298404)
yea but on paper there isnt going to be a WR that comes close to the numbers of Harvin or Jennings

The Chiefs already have a #2 with equal numbers to Harvin: Steve Breaston.

**** Harvin.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:57 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.