ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   NFLTA: Chiefs State of the Franchise (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=181318)

evolve27 03-07-2008 07:45 PM

For those of you who don't have NFL Network like me. Here is NFL.com's current take of the Chiefs.

http://www.nfl.com/videos?videoId=09000d5d8071862f


NFLTA: Chiefs Needs
http://www.nfl.com/videos?videoId=09000d5d80716f4f

NFLTA: Top 10 Chiefs Plays
http://www.nfl.com/videos?videoId=09000d5d80718b7b

Tribal Warfare 03-07-2008 08:14 PM

Just what I thought, Marshall only had good points the reason that LJ is runing well with the O-line, but he's way off base Croyle considering King Carl was pulling the strings concerning starters

Frazod 03-07-2008 08:24 PM

I want that 4:52 back. Faulk is a moron. Jim Brown couldn't run behind that line. Croyle gets no protection behind that line. Praising Herm and Carl and I've-Fallen-But-I-Can't-Get-Up Law, but throwing Brodie under the bus? Dumb.

Bweb 03-07-2008 08:33 PM

Faulk says that LJ is not the kind of back that can "carry" a team. Well, we sure gave LJ the contract of a back who should carry a team. I know our O-line is currently crap but their should be some accountability to the guy we are paying the most money to. :shrug:

talastan 03-07-2008 08:41 PM

Faulk on Brodie: :BS:

Faulk on Herm/Carl: :BS:

Faulk on Law: :BS:

Come on guys can't you spend four and a half minutes of research before you do a crap four and a half minute broadcast?:shake::shake:

kcxiv 03-07-2008 08:57 PM

I agree with him on we did NO moves to get any olinemen. We need at least 3 new guys and we picked up 0 starters. Brodie stands no freaking chance back there. I think we may end up being worse in 2008 then we were in 2007.

Frazod 03-07-2008 09:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcxiv (Post 4620878)
I agree with him on we did NO moves to get any olinemen. We need at least 3 new guys and we picked up 0 starters. Brodie stands no freaking chance back there. I think we may end up being worse in 2008 then we were in 2007.

That's true enough. We could have at least TRIED to make a move for one good veteran. ONE. Would ONE be too much to ask?

Perhaps Carl and Herm hate Croyle. I think they're trying to turn him into Shane Falco.

Deberg_1990 03-07-2008 09:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by frazod (Post 4620882)
That's true enough. We could have at least TRIED to make a move for one good veteran. ONE. Would ONE be too much to ask?

IM guessing probably 4 picks will be O-linemen in the draft.

Frazod 03-07-2008 09:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 4620885)
IM guessing probably 4 picks will be O-linemen in the draft.

I know. Again, "veteran" is the key word. Not a bunch of rookies who'll be good in time to visit Brodie's grave.

kcxiv 03-07-2008 09:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 4620885)
IM guessing probably 4 picks will be O-linemen in the draft.

4 rookies out there right now are not going to help Brodie whatsoever. Brodie will get hurt by the halfway mark if we go with what we have now starting. Even if we get Jake Long, Brodie is still going to be minced meat back there.

Deberg_1990 03-07-2008 09:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by frazod (Post 4620891)
I know. Again, "veteran" is the key word. Not a bunch of rookies who'll be good in time to visit Brodie's grave.


Ehh...ive accepted the fact hes going to struggle with or without a good line. I honestly dont think hes the long term answer at QB. At some point, a QB has to make plays on his own and make the players around him better. No excuses.

I think the Chiefs draft a QB again (anywhere from 2-4th rounds) simply because they need someone legit to push Croyle and his injury history is so bad.

kcxiv 03-07-2008 09:15 PM

I dont think Brodie is the answer either, but at least give him a chance.

BigRock 03-07-2008 09:29 PM

Brady Croyle. Nice research, Marshall. The guy still thinks getting rid of Trent was a mistake.

xbarretx 03-07-2008 09:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by talastan (Post 4620867)
Faulk on Brodie: :BS:

Faulk on Herm/Carl: :BS:

Faulk on Law: :BS:

Come on guys can't you spend four and a half minutes of research before you do a crap four and a half minute broadcast?:shake::shake:

yes you can, they just gave it "the old college try" LMAO

BigVE 03-07-2008 10:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigRock (Post 4620908)
Brady Croyle. Nice research, Marshall. The guy still thinks getting rid of Trent was a mistake.

Actually the idiot called him Brady Coy-ral.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:43 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.