ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Schefter- "Barkley Late first-round pick" Smith scouts "aren't completely wowed" (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=267409)

SAUTO 12-05-2012 09:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 9184006)
Pioli has reached every year to fill a need in the first round. I fully expect him to draft a QB if he's still here.

Baldwin was a reach? Berry?
Posted via Mobile Device

DaneMcCloud 12-05-2012 09:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 9184006)
Pioli has reached every year to fill a need in the first round. I fully expect him to draft a QB if he's still here.

Pioli reached on Berry?

Pioli reached on Baldwin?

I don't like the work he's done in Kansas City but that's just ****ing stupid.

O.city 12-05-2012 09:58 PM

I'm not comparing the players at all, but #'s wise, Geno has put up virtually identical numbers to RGIII last season, in the same conference.

petegz28 12-05-2012 09:59 PM

I don't think any of the QB's are worth a #1-#5 pick. I would like to see us trade down, get another 1st, and draft the QB later in the 1st along with another impact player.

AustinChief 12-05-2012 10:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9184002)
For the 10 millionth time, it's ridiculous to get caught up in measurables before the Combine.

This. (10 million and 1)

O.city 12-05-2012 10:00 PM

QB's, like it or not, are going to go in the top 5 from here out.


It's pretty much just the way things are.

Too many people have their "Luck" goggles on. Like Boss said in another thread, this time last year, RGIII had nearly the same grades as Geno.

Ace Gunner 12-05-2012 10:00 PM

hahahahaha

AustinChief 12-05-2012 10:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28 (Post 9184019)
I don't think any of the QB's are worth a #1-#5 pick. I would like to see us trade down, get another 1st, and draft the QB later in the 1st along with another impact player.

I highly doubt after the combine that a QB won't emerge as a top 5 guy ... but if so, than I have no problem trading down as long as we still pick one of the top 2 or 3 QBs. Again, I highly doubt this will be the case. Somebody SHOULD emerge as a clear top 5 pick by the time we draft.

RunKC 12-05-2012 10:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9184015)
Pioli reached on Berry?

Pioli reached on Baldwin?

I don't like the work he's done in Kansas City but that's just ****ing stupid.

Safety=not worth that high of a pick.

Baldwin=attitude problems moved him to an early 2nd round draft prospect.

/draft analysts

SAUTO 12-05-2012 10:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 9184033)
Safety=not worth that high of a pick.

Baldwin=attitude problems moved him to an early 2nd round draft prospect.

/draft analysts

Not true
Posted via Mobile Device

DaneMcCloud 12-05-2012 10:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 9184033)
Safety=not worth that high of a pick.

Baldwin=attitude problems moved him to an early 2nd round draft prospect.

/draft analysts

LMAO

RunKC 12-05-2012 10:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 9184034)
Not true
Posted via Mobile Device

You don't remember all the draft analysts telling us to draft Russell Okung instead of Eric Berry because of positional value?

I'm glad we took Berry though.

Mr_Tomahawk 12-05-2012 10:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 9184033)
Safety=not worth that high of a pick.

Baldwin=attitude problems moved him to an early 2nd round draft prospect.

/draft analysts

You're ****ing reeruned.

O.city 12-05-2012 10:06 PM

Safety is absolutely worth that high of a pick, in todays NFL.


QB, LT, Pass rusher, Secondary.

SAUTO 12-05-2012 10:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 9184037)
You don't remember all the draft analysts telling us to draft Russell Okung instead of Eric Berry because of positional value?

I'm glad we took Berry though.

no. I remember them saying w would take a tackle, just like every ****ing year
Posted via Mobile Device


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:27 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.