ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Better pick: Toby Gerhardt or McCluster? (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=227249)

aturnis 04-25-2010 06:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pawnmower (Post 6714004)
RB stands for Running Back in the NFL you waste of oxygen.

You are an idiot. Your opening thread says you realize they are different types of BACKS! McCluster won't be a back, he will be a WR who may occasionally line up as a RB or QB. You dumb ****!

LaChapelle 04-25-2010 06:57 PM

I think McCluster will be more apt to throw a pick
I don't understand how tight the spiral may be
has to do with anything

Ming the Merciless 04-25-2010 06:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BCD (Post 6714027)
Exactly...

HAHAHHAHA

wow...

BCD is Rustshack right? This is a practical joke, correct?

RustShack 04-25-2010 06:59 PM

I think you need to reread the question dumbass. Maybe you should reread the comments where I've said multiple times that McCluster was the better pick too.

Ming the Merciless 04-25-2010 06:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aturnis (Post 6714036)
You are an idiot. Your opening thread says you realize they are different types of BACKS! McCluster won't be a back, he will be a WR who may occasionally line up as a RB or QB. You dumb ****!

You seriously want to argue about whether McCluster is RB who plays WR or a WR who plays RB...?

The question is which will be the better pick, not which will be a better RB..

WTF is happening here...Where did all the reeruns come from?

Tombstone RJ 04-25-2010 07:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 6714000)
Gerhardt will follow in the vaunted footsteps of Tommy Vardell.

Oh wow, I actually remember Tommy Vardell.

aturnis 04-25-2010 07:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pawnmower (Post 6714044)
You seriously want to argue about whether McCluster is RB who plays WR or a WR who plays RB...?

Y

What? this is my first post in this thread doucher. McCluster started his career at Ole Miss as a WR, they switched him to RB b/c he was so dynamic they wanted to get the ball in his hands more often.

We have Jamaal Charles, we don't need a dynamic RB. We need a dynamic receiver. Have you seen him play receiver?

aturnis 04-25-2010 07:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pawnmower (Post 6714044)
You seriously want to argue about whether McCluster is RB who plays WR or a WR who plays RB...?

The question is which will be the better pick, not which will be a better RB..

WTF is happening here...Where did all the reeruns come from?

Your original question:

"So which is a better pick? Which back do you see as contributing more to the NFL?

I realize that they are different kinds of backs, so this is a difficult comparison...heck Gerhardt might even end up playing a lot of FB..."

Ming the Merciless 04-25-2010 07:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aturnis (Post 6714049)
We have Jamaal Charles, we don't need a dynamic RB. We need a dynamic receiver. Have you seen him play receiver?

I haven't seen him play receiver in the NFL, no.

That is why I am asking the question instead of stating a fact.

I am asking which the better PICK is....

I am NOT asking which one is a better running back.

RustShack 04-25-2010 07:04 PM

Hes to small to play RB in the NFL. Hes smaller than Charles. Like usual, this doucher has now idea what hes talking about and has never watched either player play.

Ming the Merciless 04-25-2010 07:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aturnis (Post 6714055)
So which is a better pick? Which back do you see as contributing more to the NFL?

I realize that they are different kinds of backs, so this is a difficult comparison...heck Gerhardt might even end up playing a lot of FB...

I understand you are confused....the word back throws you off, because you have a small brain...

But the question is WHO WILL BE A BETTER PICK...

Whether or not you choose to call him a back or a receiver is meaningless.

Ming the Merciless 04-25-2010 07:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RustShack (Post 6714058)
Hes to small to play RB in the NFL.

So you are saying he will never line up as a back? He will never be in the backfield?...Once again you are wrong and continue to make yourself look like a total ****ing moron.

aturnis 04-25-2010 07:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pawnmower (Post 6714056)
I haven't seen him play receiver in the NFL, no.

That is why I am asking the question instead of stating a fact.

I am asking which the better PICK is....

I am NOT asking which one is a better running back.

You're a reerun. You haven't seen him play RB in the NFL. You ****ed up, live us to it. Anyways, have you see him play WR in college, or workouts or...?

aturnis 04-25-2010 07:07 PM

...and the answer is YES, 10/1 McCluster will be the better pick.

RustShack 04-25-2010 07:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pawnmower (Post 6714064)
So you are saying he will never line up as a back? He will never be in the backfield?...Once again you are wrong and continue to make yourself look like a total ****ing moron.

Ronnie Brown is a awesome QB isn't he? Who do you think is a better QB.. Ronnie Brown or Matt Cassel?


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:15 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.