Better pick: Toby Gerhardt or McCluster?
 

Ok so Gerhardt went with the #51 (we took Arenas with #50).

We took McCkuster with #36.


So which is a better pick? Which back do you see as contributing more to the NFL?

I realize that they are different kinds of backs, so this is a difficult comparison...heck Gerhardt might even end up playing a lot of FB...

To me that makes the question more interesting!

(Poll Coming soon)

Jesus ****!? Why would we want Gerhardt? McCluster was a far better choice.

McCluster by a landslide.

Gerhart is a FB, McCluster is a WR. Which one is more important you dumb shit?

I take it you didn't even read the question...

That makes YOU the dumb shit...

Tony Richardson was pretty important....More important than a number of RB's who were drafted in the second round over the course of history.

I did. Your comparing a WR to a FB. Your the dumb shit.

FB's shouldn't be drafted in the second round.

Apples and Oranges...

another guy wanting his own thread on the front page

What do you expect from the planets biggest moron.

Are you really this ****ing stupid? I am comparing the PICK...Which will be a better pick...

I didn't say which will be a better RB. You have to be reeruned...no one could possibly be as stupid as you are without some kind of brain damage...

You are a SUPER reerun! Powers so beyond extraordinary dumb that it boggles the ****ign mind.

http://piratevitamins.files.wordpres...er-reerun3.jpg

Oh really so if Bradford sucks a fat dick and Berry goes to the hall of fame, we can't say Berry was a better pick?

Jesus the incompetence here is mind numbing..

I suppose you wouldnt go out on a limb and say that Dallas Clark was a better pick than Michael Haynes?

Jesus.

McCluster is a definite need... a slot receiver that can also return kicks and work out of the backfield if needed. Toby is strictly a big back and we already have two good RB's in Charles/Jones.

The learning curve for a safety and a QB are not even remotely close. You cant compare that. Berry will be an impact player this season. Who knows if Bradford will even take a snap.

What?

Gerhardt will follow in the vaunted footsteps of Tommy Vardell.

You're right..the learning curve for Gerhardt and McCluster is so completely different and radically opposed that we cannot speculate as to which will be a better pick-up on this message board devoted to speculation. My bad.

But to answer your question again. MCCLUSTER WAS THE BETTER PICK YOU DUMB ****.

RB stands for Running Back in the NFL you waste of oxygen.

You have got to be the biggest idiot alive. Thats my point. You just said you didn't say which one will be the better back when you clearly did.

Ok let me spell this out for you:

Full Back is a back

Running Back is a back

I never said 'which one will be a better RB'

I said which one will be a better BACK..

How can you be alive? I would imagine you to have killed yourself by forgetting to breathe or that your father would've honor killed you for being such a disgrace.

You know that McCluster is playing WR here right dumb shit?

But if that is your question. Then Gerhardt is the better back, since the other choice wont be playing RB.

BOTH will be playing COMPLETELY DIFFERENT POSITIONS. How often will Gerhardt be catching passes in the slot?

McCluster was the better pick.

Exactly...

But hey at least this dumb shit finally realized that Gerhardt will be playing a lot of FB after arguing with me since he joined saying he wouldn't be.

My ****ign god. Did you guys have the same special ed. teacher? Ride the same tard bus to school?

It is the PICK that is the subject of the poll / question...

****ing tool.

It was in the ****ing question you stupid ignoramus...

Jesus christ.

READ THE ****ING QUESTION

You are an idiot. Your opening thread says you realize they are different types of BACKS! McCluster won't be a back, he will be a WR who may occasionally line up as a RB or QB. You dumb ****!

I think McCluster will be more apt to throw a pick
I don't understand how tight the spiral may be
has to do with anything

HAHAHHAHA

wow...

BCD is Rustshack right? This is a practical joke, correct?

I think you need to reread the question dumbass. Maybe you should reread the comments where I've said multiple times that McCluster was the better pick too.

You seriously want to argue about whether McCluster is RB who plays WR or a WR who plays RB...?

The question is which will be the better pick, not which will be a better RB..

WTF is happening here...Where did all the reeruns come from?

Oh wow, I actually remember Tommy Vardell.

What? this is my first post in this thread doucher. McCluster started his career at Ole Miss as a WR, they switched him to RB b/c he was so dynamic they wanted to get the ball in his hands more often.

We have Jamaal Charles, we don't need a dynamic RB. We need a dynamic receiver. Have you seen him play receiver?

Your original question:

"So which is a better pick? Which back do you see as contributing more to the NFL?

I realize that they are different kinds of backs, so this is a difficult comparison...heck Gerhardt might even end up playing a lot of FB..."

I haven't seen him play receiver in the NFL, no.

That is why I am asking the question instead of stating a fact.

I am asking which the better PICK is....

I am NOT asking which one is a better running back.

Hes to small to play RB in the NFL. Hes smaller than Charles. Like usual, this doucher has now idea what hes talking about and has never watched either player play.

I understand you are confused....the word back throws you off, because you have a small brain...

But the question is WHO WILL BE A BETTER PICK...

Whether or not you choose to call him a back or a receiver is meaningless.

So you are saying he will never line up as a back? He will never be in the backfield?...Once again you are wrong and continue to make yourself look like a total ****ing moron.

You're a reerun. You haven't seen him play RB in the NFL. You ****ed up, live us to it. Anyways, have you see him play WR in college, or workouts or...?

...and the answer is YES, 10/1 McCluster will be the better pick.

Ronnie Brown is a awesome QB isn't he? Who do you think is a better QB.. Ronnie Brown or Matt Cassel?

Jesus christ you are ****ing incompetent. No one has seen himn play ANY POSITION in the NFL that is why I am asking...

It is a speculation...

Who will end up being a better pick? Gerhardt or McCluster? It is that simple....

You are as confused by this as you were by reading when you were in 1st grade and by the multiplication table when you were in 3rd grade...ytou know why? Because you are a ****ign idiot and always have been and always will be.

Its been answered many times, but this moron is too reeruned to read that. Hes just getting so pissed that we are also answering the other questions he asked.

I do not like Toby whiteguy whatsoever...

You changed my question, i never said who is better at 'x position' in the poll...

The question is who is a better DRAFT PICK you complete sophomore.

I think we can all answer that...

So that isn't a question?

Gerhardt is not gonna be that good. He doesn't have the sudden acceleration to zip through holes in the pros. He has good speed, but his acceleration sucks.

It wasn't a part of the poll. You are choosing to argue with whether or not to CALL McCluster a RB or a WR.....

That doesn't make what I said incorrect at all..

This is the kind of answer that is on point and what should be being talked about. Not whether or not to call MCluster a running back who plays receiver or a WR who plays RB sometimes.

+rep to GC

Gerhart will probably make for a nice goalline back.

I answered the poll question in the poll(and in the thread a few times), and I answered the thread question in the thread. Whats the problem? I voted McCluster was the better draft pick. I said Gerhardt was the better back since hes the only one whos plays RB. How hard is this to understand? If you don't want multiple questions answered, don't ask them. Its pretty simple actually.

Yah he looks like a beast...I hope he does more than just play FB and goal line, he is fun to watch. Even though **** the Vikings, but still I like him.

These 2 guys really aren't comparable at all, the Chiefs aren't even listing McCluster as a RB.

Go back and read your answers again. The problem is that you are a ****ign idiot douche bag. You didn't answer the question until I ****ign hammered into your thick neanderthal skull.

You can still compare the pick tho..

The question is which will end up being a better pick...

(Like you can compare which was a better Pick: Albert Haynes or Dallas Clark

even though theyre not even on the same side of the ball ...


Or Ryan leaf VS Charles Woodson..etc etc...)

McCluster will do far more from the slot than Gerhardt at FB. Happy?

If you're gonna do that you should compare him to the guys that went right around him that would also be considered solid picks.

Pawnmower, you're a dumb ass.

This thread is hilarious. ROFL

**** YOU ALL TO GOD DAMN HELL! YOU ARE ALL REDTARTEDS

Gerhardt is so much ****ing better than Mcbundle of sticks. Hes a better FB, hes a better RB, and hes a ****ing better WR.

Yes, I am happy that you continue to prove yourself the complete and utter douche bag idiot that I thought you were. I am happy you have proven once again you do not understand the question in the poll. I am happy you have proven that you are nothing more than a troll who would rather start and participate in petty arguments than contribute anything of value or substance to any discussion. I am happy there are people like you in the world, wallowing in stupidity and misery making it easier for people like me to succeed in life, get jobs and promotions and have sex with actual females.

Ok I gotta admit, Pawn just made me crack up.

McCluster went 15 picks higher than Gerhardt...it is close enough and if anything gives the advantage to McCluster for the purposes of this poll. (they were both mid/upper second round, it is close enough for me).

How am I not answering your question right?

There were four options on the poll. I don't understand how me clicking one option and hitting submit is doing it wrong.

And your name is redundantly idiotic.

You might as well call yourself one of the following:

Homosexual Gay man
Stupid Mcreerun
Troll McThreadjackoff
Ignorant guy who doesn't know anything
Black African American
Mexican Landscaper

apples to oranges ... for us McCluster is better because they are planning to use him at a slot receiver and utility player.

too high for both players

Oh shit, Pawn is ****in hilarious, when did this happen?

The world has flipped upside down since Thursday. Who the **** knows what is going to happen next.

This whole thing has turned odd, Pawn is funny and Dane was posting stuff I'd expect from Hootie.

The end of times must be approaching.

Toby coulda been our Allstott!!!!

This may be..I included a 4th option for this. I don't care so much about the apples to oranges...we have gone over that..

For example can you answer which is a better draft pick:

Ryan Leaf or Charles Woodson


Also apples to oranges but most people can answer the question.

I absolutely do not like Gerhart, I can live with McCluster if we had drafted Gerhart I'd have broken my TV.

ROFL

http://img62.imageshack.us/img62/3558/eotl2012.jpg

You've been called out as a mult. Do the honorable thing: confess, give your regular account name, and delete this account.
Posted via Mobile Device