If Flynn is indeed cut, I would be surprised if the Chiefs didn't show interest considering the ties to Dorsey. Personally, I would love to have Flynn but as a backup only. Or perhaps to compete for a starting position if our drafted QB falls on his face early.

You don't pay a backup that kinda cash. They will cut him if they don't find a trade partner and they probably won't find one.

So Flynn as our No. 1, JaMarcus "Leaner and Meaner" Russell No. 2 and take a flyer on a project in Rounds 5-7?

Done.

I don't think Flynn would come here knowing we're likely going to use our #1 overall on a QB. Guy wants to start, not go into the exact situation he's leaving.

In other related news, the Kansas City Chiefs would also be interested in trading Cassel and Quinn, but find themselves in the 'no chance in hell' category that Seattle finds itself in with Flynn.

Bingo.

I'm really scared they bring Smith here. :shake:

As they should... Get all the STH to renew, insert junk QB, no risk, no reward = happy Chiefs fanbase.

That's a terrible idea. Flynn would be an awful backup LT.

No, he's not. Pete is going to try and find another Russ Wilson in the draft, so they don't have to change their offense if Russell goes down. He wants to run that read option. Heard that on Seattle sports talk radio just yesterday.

If the Seachickens can't trade him he will stay there. What they pay combined for Wilson and Flynn is very manageable. They also are in good position cap wise. Paul Allen is the owner so money isn't an issue. I think the differences in styles is what is driving discussions. If Wilson got hurt Flynn couldn't run that style of offense nearly as well.

Matt Scott from Arizona would be a good fit for them.

Yeah this. Due to Flynn's contract no team will trade a pick for him.

That name is EVIL!

That's exactly who I think Pete is going to take. When?