ChiefsPlanet
Page 9 of 114 « First 5678 9 101112131959109 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   NFL Draft Mother**** you Scott Pioli (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=206614)

ChiTown 04-25-2009 03:11 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5707040)
He's not a game changer that really can't be debated.

He's the epitome of a safe pick.
Kind of like when everyone was SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO excited when we drafted our 1st round pick last year. You know, a game changer.

Holy crap, some of you folks must go to bed at night truly believing you're smarter than most NFL GM's.

The Bad Guy 04-25-2009 03:11 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 5707063)
So Belichick, despite being GM, isn't the guy who pulls the trigger on the pick?

So, if the pick works out, Scott Pioli gets credit despite not being the guy in charge. If they end up with Maroney, Chad Jackson, Ben Watson, or Daniel Graham, then it's Belichick's fault because he's in charge.

I love this tard logic.

Basically this board has boiled down to a street auction to see who can get to the front of the line to fluff a GM who has done nothing but make terrible moves from the day he was hired.
You talk like every opinion you have posted on this board has been gold.

There's a big difference between waiting and seeing what happens, and acting like a homocidal maniac because Pioli didn't follow the plan that you wanted.

Mecca 04-25-2009 03:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 5707063)
So Belichick, despite being GM, isn't the guy who pulls the trigger on the pick?

So, if the pick works out, Scott Pioli gets credit despite not being the guy in charge. If they end up with Maroney, Chad Jackson, Ben Watson, or Daniel Graham, then it's Belichick's fault because he's in charge.

I love this tard logic.

Basically this board has boiled down to a street auction to see who can get to the front of the line to fluff a GM who has done nothing but make terrible moves from the day he was hired.
That's what it is, the Pioli fluff contest, he can do whatever and if you question it you are a bad fan.

Sully 04-25-2009 03:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 5707055)
how do you know that?
He had a VERY good rookie year.
He just got injured.

The Bad Guy 04-25-2009 03:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5707079)
He is not Richard Seymour if he's that good I'll eat my ****ing shoe ok.
If he turns out to be, you'll never say a word.

eazyb81 04-25-2009 03:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 5707063)
So Belichick, despite being GM, isn't the guy who pulls the trigger on the pick?

So, if the pick works out, Scott Pioli gets credit despite not being the guy in charge. If they end up with Maroney, Chad Jackson, Ben Watson, or Daniel Graham, then it's Belichick's fault because he's in charge.

I love this tard logic.

Basically this board has boiled down to a street auction to see who can get to the front of the line to fluff a GM who has done nothing but make terrible moves from the day he was hired.
Who has said the bad picks are all Belichick? I certainly haven't, and I haven't seen any reputable poster on here say that.

Pioli and Belichick aren't perfect, but they're arguably the best in the league at what they do. To act like Pioli didn't play a huge role in building that Pats dynasty is downright laughable.

Acting like you know more than these guys and that they're building the team the wrong way is downright laughable, and right now the huge majority of this board is laughing at you.

SAUTO 04-25-2009 03:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SNR (Post 5707077)
It's far more likely that Sanchez will be an elite NFL QB and that Dorsey will thrive in a 4-3 than it is that the Chiefs move to the 3-4 and Cassel will work out great.
how so

wild1 04-25-2009 03:13 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5707076)
Trading for backup QB's you're familiar with then drafting a role player in the top 3 so you can shoehorn in your defensive scheme making last years top 5 pick mean nothing is not my idea of rebuilding.

Just rebuild the rebuild...they might aswell trade most of the team it's pretty obvious they aren't going with a scheme the players fits they are going to make players fit the scheme.
why the **** would you build a defense that fits the existing players?

the team won two games last year. they had 10 sacks all year. those players SUCK ASS.

who cares if we replace them? they need replacing

eazyb81 04-25-2009 03:13 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5707079)
He is not Richard Seymour if he's that good I'll eat my ****ing shoe ok.
Answer the original ****ing question.

Is Seymour a gamechanger?

Swanman 04-25-2009 03:13 PM
Don't forget that many, many people were creaming their jeans over the selections of Derrick Johnson and Glenn Dorsey, and so far those two haven't lived up to that particular hype. Maybe it was bad coaching or lack of talent around them (definitely bad coaching with Dorsey), but still, those two have not been anywhere near gamechangers. Could Jackson be a bust? Yes, but he could also be a very good player. I'll wait to see him on the field before tarding out over the pick.

wild1 04-25-2009 03:13 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 5707093)
If he turns out to be, you'll never say a word.
"Hey, I have always said...."

Mecca 04-25-2009 03:14 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by wild1 (Post 5707099)
why the **** would you build a defense that fits the existing players?

the team won two games last year. they had 10 sacks all year. those players SUCK ASS.

who cares if we replace them? they need replacing
You don't flush top 5 picks from the previous year.

Mecca 04-25-2009 03:14 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by eazyb81 (Post 5707102)
Answer the original ****ing question.

Is Seymour a gamechanger?
Sure but it's apples to oranges because he isn't Seymour so that's a nice way to try to load your point.

SAUTO 04-25-2009 03:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sully (Post 5707091)
He had a VERY good rookie year.
He just got injured.
really? he had 2 sacks who knows how many tackles cant find it.

ChiefaRoo 04-25-2009 03:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5707079)
He is not Richard Seymour if he's that good I'll eat my ****ing shoe ok.
Why don't you do this. If Jackson makes the Pro Bowl you'll give yourself a buzz cut and post the pics on the planet. Whatcha' say?


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:06 AM.
Page 9 of 114 « First 5678 9 101112131959109 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.