ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Man those Redskins sure are scoring alot (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=147968)

ChiefsCountry 09-17-2006 08:20 PM

Man those Redskins sure are scoring alot
 
Offense guru Al Saunders is sure making a difference. 16 first week, 10 tonight. :)

Immaculate 09-17-2006 08:21 PM

Little to no Clinton Portis has alot to do with that.

Deberg_1990 09-17-2006 08:21 PM

His offense here didnt fully develop until his 2nd year. Give him some time.

htismaqe 09-17-2006 08:22 PM

Haven't you heard? Al Saunders, despite having 30+ years of experience, is with a new team, with new players. He has an excuse.

milkman 09-17-2006 08:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Immaculate
Little to no Clinton Portis has alot to do with that.

I also don't think that Brunell is the right guy for this system.

htismaqe 09-17-2006 08:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990
His offense here didnt fully develop until his 2nd year. Give him some time.

Who came in that 2nd year? Oh, that's right...

Willie Roaf.

:hmmm:

Immaculate 09-17-2006 08:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman
I also don't think that Brunell is the right guy for this system.

Agree'd.

dirk digler 09-17-2006 08:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman
I also don't think that Brunell is the right guy for this system.

Yep

dirk digler 09-17-2006 08:37 PM

Actually their O has only scored 3 points. They had a 100yd kick return for a TD.

Brunell just threw an INT.

007 09-17-2006 08:39 PM

Brunell sucks too.

runnercyclist 09-17-2006 08:52 PM

and Brunell sucks dick

jspchief 09-17-2006 08:53 PM

How may points did the Chiefs score in their first two games under Saunders?

I'm no Saunders fanboy, but to claim two games is some kind of indication is just stupid.

dirk digler 09-17-2006 08:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jspchief
How may points did the Chiefs score in their first two games under Saunders?

I'm no Saunders fanboy, but to claim two games is some kind of indication is just stupid.

Oakland Raiders | L | 24-27 |
New York Giants | L | 3-13 |
at Washington Redskins | W | 45-13

I wouldn't count the second game because that was after 9-11 and we were playing the Giants so to many factors there.

Phobia 09-17-2006 08:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jspchief
to claim two games is some kind of indication is just stupid.

I'm totally taking this quote over to the Huard thread.

jspchief 09-17-2006 08:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phobia
I'm totally taking this quote over to the Huard thread.

Yea, because Huard's inability to do better than 3rd string for the last 7 years is pretty much the same thing as judgung an offensive scheme two gamess into it's implementation.

You're right though gochiefs, Huard is awesome. He knows how to "manage" a 6-9 loss almost as well as Hicks knows how to handle 1-4.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:43 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.