DC had his problems in the end but he was still a stud.

with that logic you are suggesting we should trade of our picks...

post hoc ergo propter hoc...i would still trust kc first round pick in the draft

Um, I heard no suggestion.

OK, so make it 3 studs, just for the sake of arguement.

That still leaves Carl with a mediocre 1st round history, and still leads me to ask why anyone thinks this will be one of those rare drafts that Carl drafts a stud.

We haven't drafted a player, in any round, that made a pro bowl as a Chief since TG in 1997.

wrong Dante Hall

I'm not suggesting anything.

I'm asking why anyone thinks that Carl's chances in the 1st round are so much better than the 2nd.
He really hasn't done much in either round.

Okay, an actual position player. Hall is notable, though, as a fifth rounder.

Sorry but I don't think it matters two ****s what anyone thinks other than Carl.


--->

me niether

then why should we listen to what you think


:)

You said it.

I'm beginning to come to the conclusion that you are a dumbass.

If I'm wrong then I'm sorry, if I'm right you'll never know.

Well then, why the hell are you reading this forum, cause we are all here expessing our thoughts, which don't matter two shits?

well i dont care what your conclusion is...im just saying that if you have any clue about critcal thinking, logic, inference or the rules of inference, shit just algebra might help you alittle..;). its possible you might understand the argument alittle more...you can sometimes:) see things a little clearer and not so one dimension like you son...dont just wait for information try work inference on your own or you will never get a better job son...

im just messin wit ya...do whatever you want loser but if you're gonna insult someone try alittle harder