Fair enough. It was no doubt the last time the Chiefs had anything resembling a DE.

He left, that's all that matters. And he lost. As for that sack, it was north of 50% the other guy getting there. But sure was mad as hell.. That was fun to watch.

it looked like Jared Allen alone was shifting the momentum in last nights game, but then the offense stepped on the field....

Instead, we have 2 defensive ends that we pay more $$ than Allen makes and they got us One sack last year, vs his 20+ in "meaningless time".

We got Charles from this trade, folks.

Really?

Holy shit, apparently Allen isn't a bad ass afterall.

oh but it's not the job of our franchise d-line to get stats, blah blah blah. It's okay if they never ever make any plays, they're just supposed to stand there so that the linebackers can make plays.

/cp

Or maybe the DE's are holding out for "Meaningful time" so their sacks actually count.

:spock: no he didn't.
Posted via Mobile Device

Charles AND Albert.
Posted via Mobile Device

Did I dispute that? I suppose I just find it a tad ridiculous when everyone's lamenting his loss as if it was the "worst move in franchise history." Seeing that the trade led to arguably the most dynamic player who has ever played with this franchise, I'd say we landed on our feet.

Pork Chop Sandwiches!

ib still like him ... he had heart .. sumpin the two blunderin boobs we have at DE will never have .....

:clap:

All I remember is how he wouldnt ever contain the quarterback on a bootleg that would go for 50 yards.

Plus he was immature and was not willing to grow up. A change of scenary was best for him.