Who is/was worse? Herm or Hillman?
I'm just not noticing all the hatred for Hillman. Here I had thought he was a young, promising managerial candidate who was just going through a rough transitional stage.
Now I see someone calling him a dumbass. Is he is as bad as Herm was for the Chiefs? Worse? |
Herm Hillman=Trey Edwards
|
Good men, IMO.
Terrible coaches. Terrible. |
Hillman has less to work with.
Herm probably has the higher stress job, obviously more fast pace. But Herm is the bigger idiot. |
Herm is worse, I think. A Hillman-led team of better players would win despite Hillman's presence.
|
Herm is worse by a country mile. He took this team into the dark ages. Trey at least improved upon what he had. The Royals have been tragic for decades. The Chiefs? Not entirely until Herm dealt the death blow.
|
I would think Herm. We expect douchebaggery from the Royals, not the Chiefs.
Posted via Mobile Device |
Quote:
You need to watch more Royals games, my friend. Stupid poll question on a Chiefs board, since only a small percentage of the posters are stupid enough to follow the Royals very closely, myself being one of the ****ing idiots. |
Herm at least had a philosophy...a bad one but he had one.
Hillman is ****ing clueless |
Quote:
Trey Dilweed? |
Quote:
Trey, meanwhile, pfffffffffft. |
Quote:
I can understand argues for Herm ****ing Edwards being the worst b/c a HC is more important in the NFL than a manager is in MLB. Still, Trey Edwards is really, really bad. |
Hillman took a bad team and ... kept them bad. Herm took a team that won 10 games and destroyed them in every possible way.
*edit: I know the Chiefs were an old team, but 10 wins is 10 wins. |
Hillman is so completely clueless that Herm can rightfully look down on him as an intellectual inferior.
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:52 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.