ChiefsPlanet
Page 3 of 3 12 3
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Football OLB With 21 Sacks The Last Two Seasons Available (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=208004)

Micjones 05-23-2009 03:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by milkman (Post 5787670)
First I'd ask myself why the Cowboys are so dead set on replacing him?
Because they have younger players who are prepared to step in and take over for veterans on the downslope of their careers. Me thinks it's a bad idea for this team to be overly concerned with the plight of a Dallas team in a much different situation.

Quote:
Looking at his numbers, it appears he's had some injuries in two of the last three seasons, and his 2007 season was something of a abberation.

Age and injuries could be an issue, so signing him may or may not be as black and white as it appears to you initially.
Acquiring players in the NFL is never black and white, but that's hardly a reason not to try to improve your team when opportunities present themselves.

Mr. Flopnuts 05-23-2009 03:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by H5N1 (Post 5786070)
TO THE CANOE!
LMAO Holy Christ.

Sweet Daddy Hate 05-23-2009 06:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Micjones (Post 5788121)
Because they have younger players who are prepared to step in and take over for veterans on the downslope of their careers. Me thinks it's a bad idea for this team to be overly concerned with the plight of a Dallas team in a much different situation.



Acquiring players in the NFL is never black and white, but that's hardly a reason not to try to improve your team when opportunities present themselves.

If he fits the program and can be had cheap for a year or two, make it happen.

That said, I'd be much more thrilled about acquiring someone's kick ass, geriatric Right Tackle.

milkman 05-23-2009 06:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bowener (Post 5788003)
34 is the new 32 in the NFL any how, so he's got another 2 or 3 years.....
Not at LB.

milkman 05-23-2009 06:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Micjones (Post 5788121)
Because they have younger players who are prepared to step in and take over for veterans on the downslope of their careers. Me thinks it's a bad idea for this team to be overly concerned with the plight of a Dallas team in a much different situation.
I haven't watched a lot of the Cowboys, so I don't really know, but it seems he's missed a number of games over the last two or three years, so injury has to be a concern.

Ralphy Boy 05-27-2009 07:18 PM
His 8 sacks last season are twice what Vrabel had and 22 more sacks in his career. I'm all for it.

Happened to notice he was born on the exact same day as Vrabel...8/14/75.

Saul Good 05-27-2009 07:46 PM
The Chiefs do know that the 3-4 has nothing to do with having a team full of 34 year olds, right?

Mr. Krab 05-27-2009 07:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 5797726)
The Chiefs do know that the 3-4 has nothing to do with having a team full of 34 year olds, right?
They decided that they had bigger needs in the draft than linebacker so they don't have many options at this point.

The Poz 06-02-2009 01:02 PM
It's official:

http://www.rotoworld.com/content/pla...144552&id=2699

Sweet Daddy Hate 06-02-2009 01:21 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Poz (Post 5811425)
Grab him. Hali and/or McBride at OLB do not inspire confidence. You bring him in, and you do it NOW.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:45 PM.
Page 3 of 3 12 3
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.