ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs If REid doesn't get a QB with our 1st round pick... (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=268786)

Cmd'r&Chief 01-11-2013 10:36 PM

If REid doesn't get a QB with our 1st round pick...
 
I know this is a topic of blasphemy at the moment, and without a doubt we all want a franchise QB for once. But let's face it folks, it is a possibility. . . So let's say Reid decides not to pick a QB in the first round. What should we do with our #1 pick? Linebacker? Receiver? Lineman? Trade down?


http://imageshack.us/a/img24/7427/dandyandy1.jpg

hometeam 01-11-2013 10:38 PM

Reif!

KCrockaholic 01-11-2013 10:38 PM

There IS no other option.

Every other possibility is wrong and will be frowned upon.

RealSNR 01-11-2013 10:39 PM

If they don't take QB, I hope they shove the pick right up your ass and out your mouth

Cmd'r&Chief 01-11-2013 10:39 PM

Jeeze, of course... auto-correct at it's best. Mods please feel free to change "Reif" to Reid

The Franchise 01-11-2013 10:40 PM

I really wish someone would wipe out a majority of this ****ing fanbase.

Cmd'r&Chief 01-11-2013 10:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCrockaholic (Post 9307220)
There IS no other option.

Every other possibility is wrong and will be frowned upon.

Without a doubt I would be disapointed if we don't pick up a QB. But it's indeed a possiblity. And I trust Reid will make the best decision for our Chiefs...even it means doing something else with our once in a lifetime #1 pick.

Deberg_1990 01-11-2013 10:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 9307225)
I really wish someone would wipe out a majority of this ****ing fanbase.

Hes not saying its right, hes saying its a possibility.

FlaChief58 01-11-2013 10:43 PM

It's really not an option. QB is a must for this team, everyone knows it. Despite what Clark & reid said, I firmly believe that we will get a QB with the #1 pick

MeatRock 01-11-2013 10:45 PM

How many times has this type of thread been started? Exactly.

Mother****erJones 01-11-2013 10:46 PM

REID

The Franchise 01-11-2013 10:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 9307230)
Hes not saying its right, hes saying its a possibility.

And 80% of this fanbase think that it's right.

Dylan 01-11-2013 10:46 PM

Reif

Reed

LOL

RunKC 01-11-2013 10:47 PM

Trade down for picks. But I doubt Reid won't see a QB he likes.

If he thinks a guy like Barkley is the best option, I bet he will try to trade down and get Barkley with extra picks to build the team.

Gonzo 01-11-2013 10:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dylan (Post 9307241)
Reif

Reed

LOL

Sorry... Better?

MeatRock 01-11-2013 10:47 PM

ROFL Read

SPchief 01-11-2013 10:48 PM

LMAO

Imon Yourside 01-11-2013 10:49 PM

Pass the Reif..reed..read...Oh nevermind.

RealSNR 01-11-2013 10:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gonzo (Post 9307243)
Sorry... Better?

Much LMAO

Gonzo 01-11-2013 10:50 PM

There we go... I before E, right?

Cmd'r&Chief 01-11-2013 10:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cmd'r&Chief (Post 9307224)
Jeeze, of course... auto-correct at it's best. Mods please feel free to change "Reif" to Reid

Thanks Mods, I owe you my soul.

mlyonsd 01-11-2013 10:51 PM

This is why we can't have nice things.

Dylan 01-11-2013 10:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gonzo (Post 9307243)
Sorry... Better?

Gonzo: REid... ;)

Deberg_1990 01-11-2013 10:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 9307242)
Trade down for picks. But I doubt Reid won't see a QB he likes.

If he thinks a guy like Barkley is the best option, I bet he will try to trade down and get Barkley with extra picks to build the team.

No ones trading up. There are no "cant miss" prospects worth trading up for.

Gonzo 01-11-2013 10:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dylan (Post 9307258)
Gonzo: REid... ;)

Aww shit. Ok, l fix it.

crossbow 01-11-2013 10:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dylan (Post 9307241)
Reif

Reed

LOL

Weed

Gonzo 01-11-2013 10:55 PM

Ok. All fixy.

KCrockaholic 01-11-2013 10:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 9307259)
No ones trading up. There are no "cant miss" prospects worth trading up for.

Joeckel is pretty close to can't miss. But not worthy trading up for IMO. Philly will love him.

BigRedChief 01-11-2013 11:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crossbow (Post 9307261)
Weed

http://www.growseed.org/seed.jpg

Dylan 01-11-2013 11:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gonzo (Post 9307260)
Aww shit. Ok, l fix it.

Gonzo, You can do no wrong in my eyes! :D

RunKC 01-11-2013 11:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 9307259)
No ones trading up. There are no "cant miss" prospects worth trading up for.

Doesn't mean a team won't fall in love with one of these guys though.

DaneMcCloud 01-11-2013 11:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 9307259)
No ones trading up. There are no "cant miss" prospects worth trading up for.

Waaaaay too early to make that call

KCrockaholic 01-11-2013 11:03 PM

http://t2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:A...-BiAONaUD6GBgg

TribalElder 01-11-2013 11:08 PM

Of course we are picking a QB

You think a LT will make the fans run in and fill arrowhead stadium

KCrockaholic 01-11-2013 11:09 PM

If we draft a Joeckel AND sign Vick, think about how much sense that would make.

Saccopoo 01-11-2013 11:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCrockaholic (Post 9307273)
Joeckel is pretty close to can't miss. But not worthy trading up for IMO. Philly will love him.

He's an offensive tackle coming out of a true dump down spread system with Fran Tarkenton Jr. as his QB.

This guy hasn't pass blocked for shit. He hasn't had to work on his kick step, his slide, his back peddle, his what the **** ever.

He's not the prospect that Okung, Long, Thomas or Kalil were. Not even close. And it's going to take this guy three years to bring his game up to the NFL level.

To tell you the truth, the Matthews kid looks better, and he's going back to school.

They had their chance with Okung. They took a safety.

They better sign Albert and get a QB.

****ing taking a tackle in this draft is insanity.

KCrockaholic 01-11-2013 11:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccopoo (Post 9307302)
He's an offensive tackle coming out of a true dump down spread system with Fran Tarkenton Jr. as his QB.

This guy hasn't pass blocked for shit. He hasn't had to work on his kick step, his slide, his back peddle, his what the **** ever.

He's not the prospect that Okung, Long, Thomas or Kalil were. Not even close. And it's going to take this guy three years to bring his game up to the NFL level.

To tell you the truth, the Matthews kid looks better, and he's going back to school.

They had their chance with Okung. They took a safety.

They better sign Albert and get a QB.

****ing taking a tackle in this draft is insanity.

IMO Matthews is better. He can play right or left. And will likely play left next year.

But Joeckel is a true technician. His technique is second to none in this class, and only gave up 1 pressure to Adrian Hubbard when they played Alabama. He had issues against Sam Montgomery, but even then he was outstanding. I think he is right on par with Kalil. He does a great job of getting to the second level and is a smart player. He doesn't have many flaws.

Blocking for Tannehill and Manziel helped him out a lot. Manziel in particular was terrific at avoiding pressure and allowing himself to buy time.

Joeckel could easily have a season just as successful as Kalil's. But he's not on the same level as Joe Thomas, or Okung from THIS year. Joe Staley was the best tackle in the league this year according to PFF.

Joeckel is effective in screens and has great footwork in pass protection.

He's a solid LT that should be in the pro bowl within 3 years.

But at the end of the day, I don't care. We don't need a waste of time LT. We need a QB. Geno.

Tombstone RJ 01-11-2013 11:23 PM

I think Geno Smith will remind Reid alot of McNabb so I think he takes Geno. Only thing stopping Geno from being the kc pick is if he screws the pooch at the combine and even then, I think kc still takes him.

Saccopoo 01-11-2013 11:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tombstone RJ (Post 9307317)
I think Geno Smith will remind Ried alot of McNabb so I think he takes Geno. Only thing stopping Geno from being the kc pick is if he screws the pooch at the combine and even then, I think kc still takes him.

Did you see Cam Newton pass at the Combine?

Tombstone RJ 01-11-2013 11:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccopoo (Post 9307321)
Did you see Cam Newton pass at the Combine?

no, at least I don't remember watching him throw at the combine.

RINGLEADER 01-11-2013 11:33 PM

The problem with this draft is that the only other players who experts deem locks are at positions we don't need. It's not like Calvin Johnson is out there. If there are no other reasonable options you weight your needs more. This team needs a S, CB, ILB, DE, TE, FB, QB. None of the players at those positions are worthyof the first pick. All things being equal, unless the QB options just can't play, what other direction do you go?

okcchief 01-11-2013 11:36 PM

Like you need a separate thread for this. Everyone has already volunteered this information at nauseam.

KCrockaholic 01-11-2013 11:37 PM

Ring leader has the point of the year.

And even with that said, it's not like Geno is a reerun that should be last option. He's completely worthy of being selected #1 overall. He's a top 8 talent IMO. I haven't created a "big board" yet. I save those for after the combine. I typically rank my top 100 guys. But at this point Geno is right around 3rd, or 4th overall. Maybe even 1st after further review. That's just me though. But I know of 3 scouting services that rate him #1 overall.

KCrockaholic 01-11-2013 11:39 PM

It's time for Geno Smith fans: Part II

aturnis 01-12-2013 12:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 9307259)
No ones trading up. There are no "cant miss" prospects worth trading up for.

I disagree. The Bills owner has basically said they will be after a QB. If they fall in love with either Geno or Wilson, they might trade up to make sure that they get him...

MeatRock 01-12-2013 12:15 AM

Geno #1 no question. Now i would also like to draft DeAndre Hopkins.

RunKC 01-12-2013 12:29 AM

Would not mind us taking BPA at 1 and trading back into the first round for our QB if it's a guy that Reid truly feels is the guy and we know he'll be there around the 20-30 range.

EagleRob 01-12-2013 05:59 AM

I mean this in jest but do me a favor. If you fly to New York for the draft, do not boo the non-Geno Smith selection lustily in front of a national TV audience, especially if it's not a QB. Eagles fans wanted Ricky Williams with Reid's first ever draft pick in 1999. McNabb never forgave the entire fanbase for the Dirty Thirty radio stunt. Reid doesn't often do the popular thing if he doesn't think it's right. You guys have the same Pre-draft mentality we did 14 years ago. Be careful.

Chieftain58 01-12-2013 07:41 AM

I will predict if we do pick first it won't be a QB, if we trade back to say 10th, then we will pick AJ McCarron :D

TEX 01-12-2013 08:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccopoo (Post 9307302)
He's an offensive tackle coming out of a true dump down spread system with Fran Tarkenton Jr. as his QB.

This guy hasn't pass blocked for shit. He hasn't had to work on his kick step, his slide, his back peddle, his what the **** ever.

He's not the prospect that Okung, Long, Thomas or Kalil were. Not even close. And it's going to take this guy three years to bring his game up to the NFL level.

To tell you the truth, the Matthews kid looks better, and he's going back to school.

They had their chance with Okung. They took a safety.

They better sign Albert and get a QB.

****ing taking a tackle in this draft is insanity.

Yep - This EXACTLY. Johnny Football makes him look better than he is.

ILChief 01-12-2013 08:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chieftain58 (Post 9307617)
I will predict if we do pick first it won't be a QB, if we trade back to say 10th, then we will pick AJ McCarron :D

He's staying at Alabama

Mr. Flopnuts 01-12-2013 08:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chieftain58 (Post 9307617)
I will predict if we do pick first it won't be a QB, if we trade back to say 10th, then we will pick AJ McCarron :D

That would be pretty dumb since McCarron is going back to school.

Mr. Flopnuts 01-12-2013 08:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ILChief (Post 9307659)
He's staying at Alabama

Beat me to it.

Chiefs Pantalones 01-12-2013 08:46 AM

Clark will draft McCarron's girlfriend because KC hasn't had a franchise cheerleader in 40 years.

TRR 01-12-2013 08:56 AM

I agree with others. QB is the only option. If for whatever reason KC doesn't go QB #1, I would say it would be a DL with the pick. Reid values and loves DL and depth at the position.

That being said, at this point I really don't care if it is Geno Smith, Matt Barkley, Tyler Wilson, etc. I don't care if they trade down and then pick one. Just draft a QB, any QB, in the first round. I will trust Reid to know which QB is the best pick for his system.
Posted via Mobile Device

Rasputin 01-12-2013 08:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EagleRob (Post 9307577)
I mean this in jest but do me a favor. If you fly to New York for the draft, do not boo the non-Geno Smith selection lustily in front of a national TV audience, especially if it's not a QB. Eagles fans wanted Ricky Williams with Reid's first ever draft pick in 1999. McNabb never forgave the entire fanbase for the Dirty Thirty radio stunt. Reid doesn't often do the popular thing if he doesn't think it's right. You guys have the same Pre-draft mentality we did 14 years ago. Be careful.

I would booo if not Geno Smith or any other top QB prospect.


This maybe a once in a life time opportunity to get our QB with the first pick of the draft. It's huge & no way would I be happy with any other position. I have no reason to trust or believe that we would be better off skipping a QB with our first pick of the draft. I don't curr if Andy Reid thinks he made the right decision for the better of the team or not. He would have to prove it to earn that trust just because he did it in Philly doesn't mean he should do it here.

chiefzilla1501 01-12-2013 09:02 AM

I don't really trust Reid in picking QBs. I have some trust in Pederson and a ton of trust in Dorsey.

bevischief 01-12-2013 09:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 9307225)
I really wish someone would wipe out a majority of this ****ing fanbase.

Sending in the midgets.

Dave Lane 01-12-2013 10:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCrockaholic (Post 9307300)
If we draft a Joeckel AND sign Vick, think about how much sense that would make.

Gross

Pasta Little Brioni 01-12-2013 10:56 AM

Drafting Jekyll is so full of fail. We just suffered through a 2 win season to let our good LT go, draft a guy that might make it a push, and go retread at QB again for the eleventy billionth time....awesome.

Rausch 01-12-2013 10:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave Lane (Post 9307845)
Gross

It'd be like buying a BMW for a squirrel...

Pasta Little Brioni 01-12-2013 11:07 AM

QB or bust with the pick

saphojunkie 01-12-2013 11:32 AM

QB
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by PGM (Post 9307862)
QB or bust with the pick

Everyone saying this has just gone full reerun in the other direction. The draft is fluid and who knows what can happen.

I want the RIGHT QB. If we can get him by trading down or trading up from #33, then what the hell do I care? I hope Geno Smith blows people away at pro days and combine. I hope there's no doubt that he is the #1 QB in the draft and we take him first overall.

But if he isn't the right guy, then **** him. I want the QB who is going to make this team a Super Bowl contender. If the rest of the league believes this is a weak QB class, then maybe we can take advantage of that perception and land a really talented guy others have ignored.

Regardless, this is a HUGELY pivotal time for this franchise, and this decision needs to be right. It can't simply be "Derp take a QB no matter wut or GTFO." It needs to be a carefully calculated, perfect decision.

Pasta Little Brioni 01-12-2013 11:39 AM

Dude, that's not the point. There is a group of hardcore fans here that have done our homework on guys like Geno and Wilson. I trust their judgment and my own eyes since I see the same thing. We aren't like "HERP HE'S GOT A CASSELESQUE DEEPBALL, BUT HE'S A QB!!!". We've seen the accuracy, mobility, work ethic of Geno, and came to the conclusion he's absolutely worth the pick.

Fat Elvis 01-12-2013 11:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCrockaholic (Post 9307300)
If we draft a Joeckel AND sign Vick, think about how much sense that would make.

People who say we should draft Joeckel should get a one week ban.

Agent23 01-12-2013 11:43 AM

I miss Trent Green :(

Chiefshrink 01-12-2013 11:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9307284)
Waaaaay too early to make that call

Yep ! The pimping hasn't begun yet:rolleyes:

saphojunkie 01-12-2013 11:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PGM (Post 9307924)
Dude, that's not the point. There is a group of hardcore fans here that have done our homework on guys like Geno and Wilson. I trust their judgment and my own eyes since I see the same thing. We aren't like "HERP HE'S GOT A CASSELESQUE DEEPBALL, BUT HE'S A QB!!!". We've seen the accuracy, mobility, work ethic of Geno, and came to the conclusion he's absolutely worth the pick.

I agree he is worth the pick from what I have seen, and I think there are many many many posts that back that up. But I am withholding fanaticism until we have at least gone through off the off the pre-draft process. Can you honestly say that there isn't a single quarterback in this draft that is nearly as capable? There isn't one other guy that could become a franchise QB capable of winning multiple playoff games?

If there is that guy, and we are able to get him without using the first overall pick, then that changes the situation. That's all I am saying.

I would rather have Jarvis Jones AND a franchise QB than just a franchise QB. Now, maybe that's ****ing impossible and there is no earthly way you are going to land a top flight QB without taking one with the first overall pick. Maybe.

But we don't know that yet, so it's silly to be so declarative at this point. It's just silly.

I don't believe this is a weak QB class, not the way the talking heads do. But if that becomes the rhetoric, then the Chiefs might be able to take advantage of it.

Two years ago I wanted Kaepernick. Last year I wanted WIlson (once the RG3 trade possibility was gone). This year I want Geno.

Let's just say that we can get Geno in the 2nd round. Let's say he struggles at the Combine. He tests positive for marijuana. He falls and we draft him at 33rd overall.

Are you going to freak out because we didn't take a QB at #1?

saphojunkie 01-12-2013 11:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fat Elvis (Post 9307928)
People who say we should draft Joeckel should get a one week ban.

They should have to clean Brandon Albert's ass hole during their time away.

Rasputin 01-12-2013 11:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Agent23 (Post 9307939)
I miss Trent Green :(

How about having a Trent Green without all those peski INTs? That is what Geno Smith can bring to the table. He can put up TDs in bunches during a game and he doesn't throw a bunch of INTs. He had something like 44 TDs and only 6 INTs this year.

Why wouldn't we want a QB who gives us the best chance of winning by scoring a lot of TOUCHDOWNS?

crossbow 01-12-2013 11:51 AM

Didn't we learn anything from last years draft? Washington traded its soul to the devil to move up. Miami traded up to take a chance on a QB that everyone said should go in the 2nd round. If a guy looks pretty good and a team needs a QB they are gonna move up to get him. If we wait until the 2nd round the good ones will be gone. So do we trade away our pick and end up missing what we need the most (QB) so we can have lots of picks and take a loser in the 2nd? Figure out which QB you want and take him. If he sucks then take another one when his rookie contract is up.

Pasta Little Brioni 01-12-2013 11:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC Tattoo (Post 9307955)
How about having a Trent Green without all those peski INTs? That is what Geno Smith can bring to the table. He can put up TDs in bunches during a game and he doesn't throw a bunch of INTs. He had something like 44 TDs and only 6 INTs this year.

Why wouldn't we want a QB who gives us the best chance of winning by scoring a lot of TOUCHDOWNS?

Too risky. He's not Luck.

saphojunkie 01-12-2013 11:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC Tattoo (Post 9307955)
How about having a Trent Green without all those peski INTs? That is what Geno Smith can bring to the table. He can put up TDs in bunches during a game and he doesn't throw a bunch of INTs. He had something like 44 TDs and only 6 INTs this year.

Why wouldn't we want a QB who gives us the best chance of winning by scoring a lot of TOUCHDOWNS?

His stats mean next to nothing. Seth Doege has virtually the same stats. (INTs being the difference - which is truthfully a big difference, but you get the point).

The argument for Geno is the eyeball test. You watch the kid play, and he just has patience, vision, touch, accuracy. I LOVE how he never tucks the ball and runs unless it is absolutely the last option for positive yards.

He actually reminds me more of Roethlesberger in that regard - extending plays and extending plays and then finding an open receiver. Beautiful.

Rasputin 01-12-2013 11:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PGM (Post 9307959)
Too risky. He's not Luck.

Your right we should take a TE to replace our FHOF Tony Gonzalez.

Pasta Little Brioni 01-12-2013 12:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC Tattoo (Post 9307974)
Your right we should take a TE to replace our FHOF Tony Gonzalez.

I was thinking trade down so we can take a TE AND Guard

Rasputin 01-12-2013 12:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saphojunkie (Post 9307964)
His stats mean next to nothing. Seth Doege has virtually the same stats. (INTs being the difference - which is truthfully a big difference, but you get the point).

The argument for Geno is the eyeball test. You watch the kid play, and he just has patience, vision, touch, accuracy. I LOVE how he never tucks the ball and runs unless it is absolutely the last option for positive yards.

He actually reminds me more of Roethlesberger in that regard - extending plays and extending plays and then finding an open receiver. Beautiful.

Yes. I have actually made that comparisment before on here. I brought up the difference between Trent Green was about the INTs & lack there of that Geno Smith has.

Rasputin 01-12-2013 12:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PGM (Post 9307976)
I was thinking trade down so we can take a TE AND Guard

No no no havn't you heard Mel Hairkiper say we need a DT or DE..

I think there is one from LSU we can get.

chiefzilla1501 01-12-2013 12:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saphojunkie (Post 9307964)
His stats mean next to nothing. Seth Doege has virtually the same stats. (INTs being the difference - which is truthfully a big difference, but you get the point).

The argument for Geno is the eyeball test. You watch the kid play, and he just has patience, vision, touch, accuracy. I LOVE how he never tucks the ball and runs unless it is absolutely the last option for positive yards.

He actually reminds me more of Roethlesberger in that regard - extending plays and extending plays and then finding an open receiver. Beautiful.

I don't want Smith to be compared to Big Ben, nor do I want him to ever try to play like Big Ben.

I see where you're coming from in terms of skill set. But Geno has to has to has to learn to become a pocket passer that only extends plays as a last resort. He can't try to be Big Ben.

MeatRock 01-12-2013 12:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saphojunkie (Post 9307946)
I agree he is worth the pick from what I have seen, and I think there are many many many posts that back that up. But I am withholding fanaticism until we have at least gone through off the off the pre-draft process. Can you honestly say that there isn't a single quarterback in this draft that is nearly as capable? There isn't one other guy that could become a franchise QB capable of winning multiple playoff games?

If there is that guy, and we are able to get him without using the first overall pick, then that changes the situation. That's all I am saying.

I would rather have Jarvis Jones AND a franchise QB than just a franchise QB. Now, maybe that's ****ing impossible and there is no earthly way you are going to land a top flight QB without taking one with the first overall pick. Maybe.

But we don't know that yet, so it's silly to be so declarative at this point. It's just silly.

I don't believe this is a weak QB class, not the way the talking heads do. But if that becomes the rhetoric, then the Chiefs might be able to take advantage of it.

Two years ago I wanted Kaepernick. Last year I wanted WIlson (once the RG3 trade possibility was gone). This year I want Geno.

Let's just say that we can get Geno in the 2nd round. Let's say he struggles at the Combine. He tests positive for marijuana. He falls and we draft him at 33rd overall.

Are you going to freak out because we didn't take a QB at #1?

ROFL The Chiefs are not drafing Jarvis with the #1 pick then getting Geno or Wilson in the 2nd round. Are you ****ing high?

crossbow 01-12-2013 12:13 PM

If you guys say Geno is beyond a doubt the choice then I am sold.

Maybe they decide Quinn was being held back by stupid play calling or receivers not running routes correctly. They may go with Quinn and draft a development QB in the 3rd. Dunno. I just know that this decision has to be right or we are screwed. Which means it was epically important that Scot Peephole didn't make that decision.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:17 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.