Why is Blaylock starting this week?
Why not just give the nod to Johnson since he is under contract for a few more years and played well last week?
|
It's clearly an attempt to flood this website with 17 thread variations of this weekly topic.
|
Umm....maybe because Vermeil is a crabby old bastard?? Too set in his ways to admit that LJ might be a decent back?
|
Because he is on my fantasy team!!!!!!!!
...or, because maybe they want to reduce the risk of injury to LJ??????? They are gonna need him next year. |
Blaylock i bet will start every game the rest of the season, but LJ will probably get a pretty good amount of carries.
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I don't think D.V. is wrong to start Blaylock. First of all Blaylock is an all around better back right now. I say this in the light that L.J. still hasn't picked up the blocking aspect of being a NFL runningback yet, and Blaylock has not done anything wrong that would make D.V. not start him.
|
WHY DON'T WE RUN THE 3-4
|
Quote:
If we aren't keeping Blaylock, now is the time for LJ to learn blocking...in game. |
We don't have enough decent linebackers to run a 4-3, let alone a 3-4.
|
From an insider email Bob Dole just received
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:36 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.