ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   ESPN is about to rip on the Chiefs....... (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=162167)

Mecca 04-28-2007 09:52 PM

ESPN is about to rip on the Chiefs.......
 
"What teams didn't address their needs" was what it said was coming up and it showed the Chiefs.......

I'm guessing Kiper is going to bust on us for taking Bowe over Staley.

Coach 04-28-2007 09:54 PM

ESPN doesn't know the difference between their elbows and their asses.

Fug them. They did exactly the same shit last year, especially on Hali and Pollard.

ChiefsCountry 04-28-2007 09:54 PM

Here comes the OL busting. Even though except in the 3rd we would have been reaching on OL, but we took the BPA in Tank.

BigMeatballDave 04-28-2007 09:54 PM

Kiper can lick my 'taint.

unothadeal 04-28-2007 09:55 PM

I need details!!

wazu 04-28-2007 09:55 PM

Somebody thinks Carl made a mistake? IMPOSSIBLE!

Mecca 04-28-2007 09:55 PM

According to Kiper "Staley was rated above Bowe" he had Staley as like the 18th player it's rather ridiculous.

beer bacon 04-28-2007 09:57 PM

Kiper is a tool. He had Staley rated as his 18th best player, and he was going off on every team that didn't draft him in the mid to late 1st. No way Staley was worth a 1st round pick.

Brock 04-28-2007 09:58 PM

Staley may turn out to be a great player, but I don't see how anyone could have him rated higher than Bowe in terms of value.

the Talking Can 04-28-2007 09:58 PM

they don't have a clue what are needs are.....we have needs EVERYWHERE

Mecca 04-28-2007 09:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brock
Staley may turn out to be a great player, but I don't see how anyone could have him rated higher than Bowe in terms of value.

He had Staley ahead of Bowe and Meacham.......all those recievers basically.

bdeg 04-28-2007 09:59 PM

I'm sure every teams' scouts were wrong while Mel "Hair" Kiper Jr. saw something they didn't...

beer bacon 04-28-2007 10:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can
they don't have a clue what are needs are.....we have needs EVERYWHERE

Technically, we didn't address all our needs. The thing is, we would have needed six or seven first round picks if we were going to address ALL our needs. I think we did really well considering we didn't have a dozen picks in the first three rounds.

siberian khatru 04-28-2007 10:00 PM

My self-esteem has been crushed.

beer bacon 04-28-2007 10:01 PM

Hell, I think we actually did quite well considering we addressed four "needs" with three picks.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:22 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.