ChiefsPlanet
Page 1 of 5 1 2345
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   MU MU/OSU Final INT (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=193969)

Pitt Gorilla 10-11-2008 10:24 PM
MU/OSU Final INT
 
http://www.tigerboard.com/uimages/user15874_1.jpg

I thought it might get lost in the game thread. OSU was still the better team, but it would have been nice to see the game played to the end.

mikeyis4dcats. 10-11-2008 10:24 PM
you can't see his hands anywhere, for all anyone knows he caught the ball.

KC_Connection 10-11-2008 10:25 PM
It's a NCAA conspiracy to get USC back in the championship game.

Reerun_KC 10-11-2008 10:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by KC_Connection (Post 5106440)
It's a NCAA conspiracy to get USC back in the championship game.
Its working...

luv 10-11-2008 10:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikeyis4dcats. (Post 5106439)
you can't see his hands anywhere, for all anyone knows he caught the ball.
The ball is on the ground. And you're right. You don't see his hands...including on the ball.

Reerun_KC 10-11-2008 10:26 PM
print'em

irishjayhawk 10-11-2008 10:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikeyis4dcats. (Post 5106439)
you can't see his hands anywhere, for all anyone knows he caught the ball.
What do you mean? Looks pretty clear to me.

88TG88 10-11-2008 10:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by KC_Connection (Post 5106440)
It's a NCAA conspiracy to get USC back in the championship game.
yes

mikeyis4dcats. 10-11-2008 10:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by luv (Post 5106445)
The ball is on the ground.
so? you can't see his hands prior to or during that moment. He may very well have caught the ball and then lost it when he hit. he may have a hand on the far side pinning the ball to his stomach.

there is no indisputable proof.

Pitt Gorilla 10-11-2008 10:28 PM
No conspiracy, it was just weird that it wasn't overturned.

irishjayhawk 10-11-2008 10:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikeyis4dcats. (Post 5106456)
so? you can't see his hands prior to or during that moment. He may very well have caught the ball and then lost it when he hit. he may have a hand on the far side pinning the ball to his stomach.

there is no indisputable proof.
IIRC, that means it's incomplete. You have to maintain control. Trapping cannot occur.

mikeyis4dcats. 10-11-2008 10:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by luv (Post 5106445)
The ball is on the ground. And you're right. You don't see his hands...including on the ball.
it was ruled a pick on the field, they need INDISPUTABLE video evidence to overturn it.

get over it.

irishjayhawk 10-11-2008 10:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikeyis4dcats. (Post 5106461)
it was ruled a pick on the field, they need INDISPUTABLE video evidence to overturn it.

get over it.
That looks pretty indisputable.

Though, I'd like an animated one, if possible.

DeezNutz 10-11-2008 10:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikeyis4dcats. (Post 5106461)
it was ruled a pick on the field, they need INDISPUTABLE video evidence to overturn it.

get over it.
Like a picture of the ball on the ground?

mikeyis4dcats. 10-11-2008 10:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by irishjayhawk (Post 5106466)
That looks pretty indisputable.

Though, I'd like an animated one, if possible.
can you say with certainty he doesn't have a hand pinning the ball to his stomach?

can you say he didn't have hands on it, then the ground popped it out?


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:05 PM.
Page 1 of 5 1 2345
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.