ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Saccopoo Memorial Draft Forum (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=29)
-   -   Who does the Planet want the Chiefs to pick at #3? (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=203851)

ILChief 03-07-2009 09:14 PM

Who does the Planet want the Chiefs to pick at #3?
 
who do you want

Nightfyre 03-07-2009 10:04 PM

raji/sanchez

melbar 03-08-2009 02:04 AM

Curry or Raji

CupidStunt 03-08-2009 02:43 AM

Whichever pass-rusher Pioli likes best, ideally at No. 7 or 8 but ultimately I'm sure at No. 3.

philfree 03-08-2009 07:02 AM

It's Curry unless Pioli swings a trade. Curry's hands down the best player in this draft positional value be damned.


PhilFree:arrow:

Go Mizzou & Chiefs 03-08-2009 09:04 AM

maclin or orakapo

milkman 03-08-2009 09:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Go Mizzou & Chiefs (Post 5565784)
maclin or orakapo

Holy Shit!

:banghead:

The Bad Guy 03-08-2009 09:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Go Mizzou & Chiefs (Post 5565784)
maclin or orakapo

Just when you thought they couldn't get any dumber.

Coogs 03-08-2009 09:35 AM

I was on the Stafford/Sanchez bandwagon, so I am not really sure right now what direction I would like to see us go.

'Hamas' Jenkins 03-08-2009 09:36 AM

A Shane Douglas Quarterback.

suds79 03-08-2009 09:57 AM

If both QBs are still on the board, I'd be pretty disappointed if they didn't hold that as ransom to trade down.

Then they could still (if they don't drop too far) draft Raji and you have your NT for the 3-4.

... Or this might seem crazy but say they don't have any takers right at that moment. Would it be so bad to still draft Stafford if he is indeed the BPA at the time?

They could always trade later in the draft if they want to.

I would have to think the 49ers at #10 would have to be interested.

Coogs 03-08-2009 10:08 AM

If we do go to the 3-4, is Raji really a long term solution to the NT position? Or would waiting one year and going with Cody be the better option?

And I agree with you on the QB thing as well. If we remain at #3 and one of the QB is the best player available, I wouldn't really mind if we took that player either.

Hootie 03-08-2009 10:13 AM

I'm officially on the Aaron Curry bandwagon. The dude has all-pro written all over him...I don't give a shit about his "positional value"...if he goes to the pro bowl every year, he's worth the #3 pick.

'Hamas' Jenkins 03-08-2009 10:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie (Post 5565858)
I'm officially on the Aaron Curry bandwagon. The dude has all-pro written all over him...I don't give a shit about his "positional value"...if he goes to the pro bowl every year, he's worth the #3 pick.

A really good, but not great nose tackle is more important to a defense than any Mike backer.

Look at the 49ers. The best MLB in the game, a good DE, a very good corner, and they are 23rd in defense.

Look at the Browns. They have Shaun Rogers, two good inside backers, an underwhelming secondary, no pass rush, and they finished 16th

Coogs 03-08-2009 11:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 5565879)
A really good, but not great nose tackle is more important to a defense than any Mike backer.

Look at the 49ers. The best MLB in the game, a good DE, a very good corner, and they are 23rd in defense.

Look at the Browns. They have Shaun Rogers, two good inside backers, an underwhelming secondary, no pass rush, and they finished 16th

But since this is not a 1 year fix, would it be wrong to add a Curry this season and a Cody next season? Wouldn't the 3-4 be more Ravens and Steelers like in the long run?


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:42 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.