Who does the Planet want the Chiefs to pick at #3?
who do you want
|
raji/sanchez
|
Curry or Raji
|
Whichever pass-rusher Pioli likes best, ideally at No. 7 or 8 but ultimately I'm sure at No. 3.
|
It's Curry unless Pioli swings a trade. Curry's hands down the best player in this draft positional value be damned.
PhilFree:arrow: |
maclin or orakapo
|
Quote:
:banghead: |
Quote:
|
I was on the Stafford/Sanchez bandwagon, so I am not really sure right now what direction I would like to see us go.
|
A Shane Douglas Quarterback.
|
If both QBs are still on the board, I'd be pretty disappointed if they didn't hold that as ransom to trade down.
Then they could still (if they don't drop too far) draft Raji and you have your NT for the 3-4. ... Or this might seem crazy but say they don't have any takers right at that moment. Would it be so bad to still draft Stafford if he is indeed the BPA at the time? They could always trade later in the draft if they want to. I would have to think the 49ers at #10 would have to be interested. |
If we do go to the 3-4, is Raji really a long term solution to the NT position? Or would waiting one year and going with Cody be the better option?
And I agree with you on the QB thing as well. If we remain at #3 and one of the QB is the best player available, I wouldn't really mind if we took that player either. |
I'm officially on the Aaron Curry bandwagon. The dude has all-pro written all over him...I don't give a shit about his "positional value"...if he goes to the pro bowl every year, he's worth the #3 pick.
|
Quote:
Look at the 49ers. The best MLB in the game, a good DE, a very good corner, and they are 23rd in defense. Look at the Browns. They have Shaun Rogers, two good inside backers, an underwhelming secondary, no pass rush, and they finished 16th |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:42 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.