Weird rumor about the Chiefs getting Seymour
 

Found this on Patsfans.com, don't know where it came from, but it would be f**king hilarious...

http://www.patsfans.com/new-england-...done-deal.html

Post #5:

They're saying that Seymour could end up going to KC for their 2010 #2, without saying more about what is written there it sounds like the Patriots could probably fall back on that if they wanted and the assumption (by me) is it depends if they want to do that or push the Raider deal, presumably with the 5 day letter which would leave Seymour little choice but to report.

That would be great!

man... can you imagine?

This offseason has already been the best ever... but dear god...

Hey, why not.

Belichick likes Pioli.

The Chiefs have cap space.

The Chiefs could use Seymour.

Seymour would probably rather play in KC, for Pioli, with Vrabel and Cassel, where he has a better chance to win.

Seymour would probably work out a new contract to stay in KC, as opposed to wanting to run screaming from Oakland at the first opportunity.

Last but not least, it would allow Patriots fans to root for Seymour, since almost no one hates the Chiefs but almost everyone hates the Raiders. :D

That would absolutely slay all of these Oakland fans who have already worked themselves into a frenzy over how they got a bargain by getting him for a first :P

Hell, even if the Chiefs don't trade for Seymour, I bet they sign him as a FA in 2010.

Why would the Chiefs trade a 2nd for a D-end when they already got 2 D-ends that were first round picks?

What am I missing here?

Is the Seymour trade not final?

And even if it's not, how ****ing stupid would it be to invest ANOTHER high draft pick in a goddamn 5-technique?

Oh my God, it would be worth it just to see all the shellshocked faces wearing masks and makeup, LOL.

idk if id give up a 2 for him

Oakland has to give up their #1 in 2011 for Seymour but we dish out one of our #2's? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, that would be faaaaaaaaaaaantastic

When did Seymour start playing on the o-line?

ROFL Why am I not surprised by this post? Some of you, man, you're unbelievable. Mention a rumor that the Chiefs might get Seymour for a 2nd-rounder, which would be a pretty good deal for them, and not five minutes later it's already labeled as a stupid move. I swear, if Pioli traded for Tom Brady and Peyton Manning, someone here would complain that the #3 QB sucks ass, LOL...

Why? He wouldn't play NT. That's what we need is a nose.

Besides, as mediocre as Tank is, we should give him a season at his new position. After we go 1-15, THEN we'll figure stuff out.

I'd love to know what is great about spending the 3rd overall pick, the 5th overall pick, a 2nd round pick and a high 3rd round pick on the same goddamn position, which isn't even that ****ing important in a 3-4 defense?

Tyson Jackson- #3 overall
Glenn Dorsey- #5 overall

Are we spending a 2nd rounder on a backup or what? That would be stupid, especially a 30+ year old backup.