I'm thinking that we should consider Clausen in the 1st.
 

Cassel needs to get his shit together.

He can push Cassel then we can trade Cassel away after a year or MAYBE two.

:hmmm: I think I should leave this one alone.I'm already too damn critical of Cassel or so I'm told.

Or we can draft Clausen, and then ransom him as trade bait for a QB desperate team.

Have we considered this angle before?

Kinda like how the Chargers got good? Drafting Manning and the Giants trading the farm for him?

We thought about this last year, then some a-hole leaked that the Chiefs had signed Cassel to a long term contract ON DRAFT DAY. It was ****ing Mangini, I know it

Sweet....another Clausen thread.

I wouldnt be opposed. I think you should always take BPA when your as bad as the Chiefs.

But its not gonna happen with this GM.

Realistically, in 11 if Cassel has another bad year.

Then we could trade Cassell to the Vikings for Jared Allen. They're going to be needing a quarterback.

Game changing DEs are hard to find. :hmmm:

LOL @ these threads....

But its nice to dream...

ROFL :clap:

I would love to try to draft that Franchise QB. I just dont see Pioli admitting they he made a mistake. Drafting Clausen means that Cassel deal was a **** up and lets face it, they arent going to admit that this year.

I dont know who we draft, we just need that player to be an impact player. Someone that can make the team better. We have 3 possibilities that we will draft, Suh, Berry or Clausen. Granted we lose on Sunday.

Draft is going to be interesting thats for sure.

Cassel may be handicapped, his eyes are too close together. Look at them, they are 2/3 the distance apart of a normal person. This is the problem with his depth perception and inability to throw complete passes over ten yards.

Jared Allen should have been a Bronco
fades when the games start to count