Does anything less than a playoff appearance = Bye Bye Pioli?
 

This isn't a thread bashing Pioli it's simply to encourage discussion.

The Facts:

The Chiefs have finished in last place 2 out of the 3 seasons since Pioli took over.

The Chiefs have averaged 7 wins under the Pioli regime.

The 2009 draft= Fail

The Trade for Matt Cassel turns out it wasn't good.

Already fired one coach missing the playoffs this year with this squad would mean Crennel isn't that good of a coach.

So does anything less than a playoff appearance= failure? If so that would be 3 out of 4 years Pioli has failed. That gets you walking papers with most franchises.

Peyton Manning

Bump
Posted via Mobile Device

If Clark's sole goal is to make money, Pioli is his man and he will stay.

Somebody PM me PM`s address....BUMP!

I think the little ****er has a huge ego, which works great for Chiefs fans. When he took over he went out and signed the (perceived) best GM out there. He spent money on what was thought to be a really good QB (**** you clarK!) and has re-signed all of our key players except for Carr. I think the guy wants to win a SB as much as we want this team to win one

I see the Pioli defenders don't want to take on this subject of what very well could happen given Peyton Manning in the division.

Piloli is an average GM pre Cassell. ..that being said, his love affair with Cassell is setting this franchise back another 5-10 years and the ****er should burn at the stake because of it.

Should it? Yes.
Will it? No.

Beermenoonanbieberfever.

I think that he stays for at least 5 more years. He has done a good job building a team except for one position.



Too bad it's the most important position.

I think Clark will give him another opportunity with a different QB then go from there. After that happens, then Clark can make a better decision IMO.

It depends on the circumstance.

I'll say that if Cassel hasn't vastly improved by midseason (by game 6, we should know because it's a tough opening stretch) and he is still starting even though we are losing....a change should be seriously debated.

How about pointing the finger at the HUNT'S? Are they to not responsible for the 40 years of suck that has been KC football?

I know some people say this, but what exactly should the Hunts do differently?