ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   D.C. (http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=30)
-   -   U.S. Issues Not So Fast, Scott Walker... (http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=263677)

Mr. Kotter 09-15-2012 01:26 PM

Not So Fast, Scott Walker...
 
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/0...comm_ref=false

Wisconsin Collective Bargaining Law Struck Down By County Judge
By SCOTT BAUER 09/14/12 07:46 PM


MADISON, Wis. A Wisconsin judge on Friday struck down nearly all of the state law championed by Gov. Scott Walker that effectively ended collective bargaining rights for most public workers.

Walker's administration immediately vowed to appeal, while unions, which have vigorously fought the law, declared victory. But what the ruling meant for existing public contracts was murky: Unions claimed the ruling meant they could negotiate again, but Walker could seek to keep the law in effect while the legal drama plays out.

The law, a crowning achievement for Walker that made him a national conservative star, took away nearly all collective bargaining rights from most workers and has been in effect for more than a year.

Dane County Circuit Judge Juan Colas ruled that the law violates both the state and U.S. Constitution and is null and void.

In his 27-page ruling, the judge said sections of the law "single out and encumber the rights of those employees who choose union membership and representation solely because of that association and therefore infringe upon the rights of free speech and association guaranteed by both the Wisconsin and United States Constitutions."

Colas also said the law violates the equal protection clause by creating separate classes of workers who are treated differently and unequally.
The ruling applies to all local public workers affected by the law, including teachers and city and county government employees, but not those who work for the state. They were not a party to the lawsuit, which was brought by a Madison teachers union and a Milwaukee public workers union.
Walker issued a statement accusing the judge of being a "liberal activist" who "wants to go backwards and take away the lawmaking responsibilities of the legislature and the governor. We are confident that the state will ultimately prevail in the appeals process."

Wisconsin Department of Justice spokeswoman Dana Brueck said DOJ believes the law is constitutional.

The ruling throws into question changes that have been made in pay, benefits and other work rules in place across the state for city, county and school district workers.

Walker's law, passed in March 2011, only allowed for collective bargaining on wage increases no greater than the rate of inflation. All other issues, including workplace safety, vacation, health benefits, could no longer be bargained for.

The ruling means that local government and schools now must once again bargain over those issues, said Lester Pines, an attorney for Madison Teachers Inc. that brought the case.

"We're back to where we were before the law was enacted," he said.
Pines predicted the case would ultimately be resolved by the state Supreme Court.

"What's going to happen in the interim is unknown," he said.

The state Supreme Court in June 2011 ruled that the law was constitutional after it had been blocked by a different Dane County judge on a challenge over its passage being a violation of open meetings law.

Walker introduced the proposal in February 2011, six weeks after he took office. It resulted in a firestorm of opposition and led to huge protests at the state Capitol that lasted for weeks. All 14 Democratic state senators fled the state to Illinois for three weeks in an ultimately failed attempt to stop the law's passage from the Republican-controlled Legislature.

The law required public workers to pay more for their health insurance and pension benefits at the same time it took away their ability to collectively bargain over those issues. Walker argued the changes were needed to help state and local governments save money at a time Wisconsin faced a $3 billion budget shortfall.

Anger over the law's passage led to an effort to recall Walker from office. More than 930,000 signatures were collected triggering the June recall election. Walker won and became the first governor in U.S. history to survive a recall.

The lawsuit was among several filed against the law.

A coalition of unions filed a federal lawsuit in Madison in June 2011, arguing that the law violated the U.S. Constitution's equal protection clause because it exempted firefighters and police officers. A federal just upheld most of the law in March, but the rulings are under appeal.

Another lawsuit was filed in July 2011 by two unions representing about 2,700 public workers in Madison and Dane County. They also challenged the law on equal protection grounds. The case is pending.

Democrats and unions were ecstatic with Friday's ruling.

"As we have said from day one, Scott Walker's attempt to silence the union men and women of Wisconsin's public sector was an immoral, unjust and illegal power grab," said Phil Neuenfeldt, president of the Wisconsin State AFL-CIO.

The Democratic minority leader in the state Assembly called the ruling a huge victory for workers and free speech.

"This decision will help re-establish the balance between employees and their employers," said Rep. Peter Barca.

Republican Rep. Robin Vos, a staunch supporter of the law and the presumptive next speaker of the Assembly, called the ruling an example of the "arrogance of the judiciary."

"I'm confident it's a single judge out of step with the mainstream," Vos said. He said the law is working "and we'll continue to implement it."

Trivers 09-15-2012 01:34 PM

Speed bump.

Talked to local WI judge this afternoon and their comment was that "Colas has a rep as a lightweight; and ruling will most likely be overturned".

As an Indie, it's fun to watch both sides battle over Walker.

Stay tuned.

BigRedChief 09-15-2012 02:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trivers (Post 8911973)
As an Indie

http://disneydollars.co.uk/images/notexist.gif

RINGLEADER 09-15-2012 02:15 PM

And it will be overturned. Just like it was the last time a lower court said what he did wasn't constitutional.

Maybe the unions can hold another recall effort or something when that happens...

http://www.jsonline.com/news/statepo...123859034.html

Chiefshrink 09-15-2012 04:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trivers (Post 8911973)
Speed bump.

Talked to local WI judge this afternoon and their comment was that "Colas has a rep as a lightweight; and ruling will most likely be overturned".

As an Indie, it's fun to watch both sides battle over Walker.

Stay tuned.

Yep:thumb:

SNR 09-15-2012 04:56 PM

Ohnoes a COUNTY judge ruled against it??? After it was ruled constitutional by the STATE SUPREME COURT?

Walker is scr00d!!!

Baby Lee 09-15-2012 04:57 PM

Germans bombed Pearl Harbor?

SNR 09-15-2012 04:59 PM

Is this the Dane County judge?

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/DtonKfWw2JY" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

LiveSteam 09-15-2012 05:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 8912290)
Is this the Dane County judge?

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/DtonKfWw2JY" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Cosmo works at Noddles. who would have guessed?

Baby Lee 09-15-2012 05:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 8912290)
Is this the Dane County judge?

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/DtonKfWw2JY" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

How is this even possible?

Strains of Guthrie's 'I ain't got no home in this world anymore' playing in my head.

qabbaan 09-15-2012 05:10 PM

This isn't even "so you're tellin me there's a chance" worthy

Mr. Kotter 09-15-2012 07:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by qabbaan (Post 8912306)
This isn't even "so you're tellin me there's a chance" worthy

Eh, don't know about that....but it's funny as hell. Especially as Romney does a faceplant against...."We SHOULD be able to beat this guy!!!" Heh.

Mr. Kotter 09-15-2012 07:15 PM

FTR, this is the part of the ruling...that is somewhat different from previous rulings, which could cause Walker and his tea-party wanksters to squirm and dance a wee-bit before not just the WI SC, but the US SC. Guess we'll see, but it's fun to watch nonetheless. Heh.

Quote:

In his 27-page ruling, the judge said sections of the law "single out and encumber the rights of those employees who choose union membership and representation solely because of that association and therefore infringe upon the rights of free speech and association guaranteed by both the Wisconsin and United States Constitutions."

Colas also said the law violates the equal protection clause by creating separate classes of workers who are treated differently and unequally.



LMAO

RINGLEADER 09-15-2012 08:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Kotter (Post 8912608)
FTR, this is the part of the ruling...that is somewhat different from previous rulings, which could cause Walker and his tea-party wanksters to squirm and dance a wee-bit before not just the WI SC, but the US SC. Guess we'll see, but it's fun to watch nonetheless. Heh.



LMAO

What part of the law limits people from assembling in a union?

I do agree with you that unions should be allowed to negotiate with the political party that they fund (and therefore, by extension, control). It is much more important that unions be allowed to earn 2 or even 3 times what the private sector gets for the same job, receive a pension that pays them six figures in perpetuity, etc. Those are all good uses of public money in my book. I don't see how anyone could be against it really.

BryanBusby 09-16-2012 12:54 AM

Gotta love the GOP.

"We love protecting freedo.......UNION?!? **** YOU, ILLEGAL!"


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:59 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.