ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   The Lounge (http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Chiefs 2013 QB (http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=264970)

O.city 10-10-2012 11:09 PM

Chiefs 2013 QB
 
This was brought up in another thread so I thought I'd make a thread out of it. Say the chiefs draft a qb in the first round this year.



Thru his first 12 starts, he puts up Brady Quinn numbers. Are you ready to move on? What does he have to show for you to be patient?

For me, I'm not so much worried about the numbers early on, just that he's improving game to game and doesn't continue to make the same mistakes over and over, then starts putting up numbers.

Inmem58 10-10-2012 11:10 PM

Peyton Manning

Chocolate Hog 10-10-2012 11:18 PM

No.

KC Tattoo 10-10-2012 11:31 PM

Geno Smith wouldn't be Brady Quinnish.


Just saying.

Phobia 10-10-2012 11:32 PM

It takes time for a young QB to develop. It doesn't take any time at all to destroy a young QB mentally. This is why young QBs shouldn't start immediately for awful teams.

RustShack 10-10-2012 11:35 PM

As we have learned from guys like Quinn and Croyle, 12 games max or bust. Who cares about the long list of late bloomers.

Chief_For_Life58 10-10-2012 11:35 PM

yeah whatre u retarded? u draft a first round qb hes 22 23 years old hes not brokedick 30 year old caserole. You give him ATLEAST 3 years to develop and see how he inproves every season and find out his ceiling.

RustShack 10-10-2012 11:36 PM

Even though some people would have been OK with selecting Weeden in the first, who is older than Quinn.

KC Tattoo 10-10-2012 11:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phobia (Post 9000757)
It takes time for a young QB to develop. It doesn't take any time at all to destroy a young QB mentally. This is why young QBs shouldn't start immediately for awful teams.

I whole heartly disagree / Andrew Luck

Bump 10-10-2012 11:43 PM

You gotta be patient man with a rookie 1st rounder. They don't usually take you to the playoffs the first year and I'm not digging this sophmore slump trend, wtf

SNR 10-10-2012 11:43 PM

Dude, this is a ridiculous question.

Provided we don't do something unbelievably retarded like draft Brandon ****ing Weeden, the QB we draft needs to be given a chance. If he starts in his first season, struggles are okay. I also think he should gradually show improvement from those initial struggles. You see that in Andrew Luck right now, and it wouldn't be much to ask of the guy we draft.

Geno's the only guy I really trust to set this franchise on the path toward success. If we draft Matt Barkley, I'll be patient, though. I'll give him his time. At least a full season, two if he gets better, so on and so forth.

Phobia 10-10-2012 11:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC Tattoo (Post 9000765)
I whole heartly disagree / Andrew Luck

Poor example. Dude was NFL ready out of college.

KC Tattoo 10-10-2012 11:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phobia (Post 9000768)
Poor example. Dude was NFL ready out of college.

Well ok. A first round pick should be NFL ready isn't that what we want?

I'd put Geno Smith as NFL ready and with that our team wouldn't be that bad as this year what we got is going gain that experience especially along the O-line other than Hudson who really could have benifited with this year under his belt.

Now other QBs not named Geno Smith just depends where they are at for the next level, but imo the best way is to play.

Bump 10-10-2012 11:48 PM

but ya, if the planet goes on melt down mode if our rookie QB has a bad first game, I'm gonna be disappointed in you guys.

RustShack 10-10-2012 11:50 PM

Based on Drew Brees' first three years, he will never be a franchise QB.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:55 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.