ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Would you trade the no. 1 pick for Cam Newton? (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=270122)

HolyHat 02-17-2013 02:39 AM

Would you trade the no. 1 pick for Cam Newton?
 
We ran into this topic late Saturday night in another thread.

I personally don't like Cam at all. He's got a ton of talent, but is an absolute idiot. He can't even learn a full playbook. Newton has put up some big numbers, but they haven't translated into a lot of wins.

He is 13-19 as a starter over 2 years.

58.9% comp | 7,920 yards pass | 40 passing TDs | 29 INTS | 1,447 rush yards | 22 rushing TDs |

Would you give up our no. 1 pick for Cam Newton?

bevischief 02-17-2013 02:41 AM

Put down whatever you are doing.

OrtonsPiercedTaint 02-17-2013 02:45 AM

Not enough Clark Kent.

Dante84 02-17-2013 02:56 AM

Moot thread is moot

AussieChiefsFan 02-17-2013 02:57 AM

It's tough. Cam has the physical attributes and I guess he CAN get smarter/learn more. Although I DO believe in Geno and what he can do. I''m on the fence at this point.

HolyHat 02-17-2013 03:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dante84 (Post 9409929)
Moot thread is moot

Coming from the guy who started the "is it safe to assume we won't draft Joeckel" thread.

Dante84 02-17-2013 03:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Pink (Post 9409938)
Coming from the guy who started the "is it safe to assume we won't draft Joeckel" thread.

Um, that's not moot. Its something that is possible, whereas this is not.

Good try though!

crazycoffey 02-17-2013 03:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AussieChiefsFan (Post 9409932)
It's tough. Cam has the physical attributes and I guess he CAN get smarter/learn more. Although I DO believe in Geno and what he can do. I''m on the fence at this point.

Absolutely take cam over geno, sorry....

NJChiefsFan 02-17-2013 03:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dante84 (Post 9409941)
Um, that's not moot. Its something that is possible, whereas this is not.

Good try though!

This isn't impossible. It's just very very very unlikely.

crazycoffey 02-17-2013 03:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crazycoffey (Post 9409952)
Absolutely take cam over geno, sorry....

I mean, this is almost a trade for luck scenario... Almost

AussieChiefsFan 02-17-2013 03:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crazycoffey (Post 9409954)
I mean, this is almost a trade for luck scenario... Almost

I'd put Andrew Luck way ahead of Cam.

crazycoffey 02-17-2013 04:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NJChiefsFan (Post 9409953)
This isn't impossible. It's just very very very unlikely.

Right, it's a true hypothetical debate topic. I say yes. Over geno, I'd take cam or rgIII. Trading the 1st for another QB? Luck is about the only other option. They're young and have potential along with playing time in the NFL. Where geno is just young and has potential, but no playing time. Too big of a gap.

crazycoffey 02-17-2013 04:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AussieChiefsFan (Post 9409957)
I'd put Andrew Luck way ahead of Cam.

Don't blame you

crazycoffey 02-17-2013 04:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AussieChiefsFan (Post 9409957)
I'd put Andrew Luck way ahead of Cam.

By the way, any other active QBs you trade #1 for?

AussieChiefsFan 02-17-2013 04:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crazycoffey (Post 9409961)
By the way, any other active QBs you trade #1 for?

Off the top of my head, to have on the current Chiefs team for the #1 overall pick. These:


Aaron Rodgers
Andrew Luck
Russell Wilson
RG3
Eli Manning
Matt Ryan
Drew Brees
Big Ben?
P. Manning?


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:28 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.