ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   D.C. (http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=30)
-   -   Obama Men who are physically strong are more likely to take a right wing political stance (http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=273126)

3rd&48ers 05-16-2013 04:32 PM

Men who are physically strong are more likely to take a right wing political stance
 
Men who are physically strong are more likely to take a right wing political stance, while weaker men are inclined to support the welfare state, according to a new study.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/ar...#ixzz2TUuJ38RP

Garcia Bronco 05-16-2013 04:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by R8ers (Post 9687462)
Men who are physically strong are more likely to take a right wing political stance, while weaker men are inclined to support the welfare state, according to a new study.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/ar...#ixzz2TUuJ38RP

These kinds of studies are worthless IMO.

patteeu 05-16-2013 04:43 PM

I have to admit, I'm kinda right wing.

cosmo20002 05-16-2013 04:44 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Could be true

3rd&48ers 05-16-2013 04:47 PM

http://t1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:A...ZyXqETYkVMDBdw

BucEyedPea 05-16-2013 04:49 PM

Rambo comes to mind.

LiveSteam 05-16-2013 04:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BucEyedPea (Post 9687492)
Rambo comes to mind.

Rambo's a pussy
Tango & Cash (1989)

WhiteWhale 05-16-2013 05:01 PM

Measuring a bicep is not the best way to determine upper body strength.

Arms get fat too.

BucEyedPea 05-16-2013 05:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LiveSteam (Post 9687497)
Rambo's a pussy
Tango & Cash (1989)

Never heard of them. Musta' gone to video real fast.

I was gonna say Arnie, BUT he's really a Prog. No wonder he's turned to flab.LMAO

LiveSteam 05-16-2013 05:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BucEyedPea (Post 9687564)
Never heard of them. Musta' gone to video real fast.

I was gonna say Arnie, BUT he's really a Prog. No wonder he's turned to flab.LMAO

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/KU2N56ixpxE" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

listopencil 05-16-2013 05:34 PM

This is your brain on politics
Posted: 10/31/12 @ 4:15 PM | Updated: 11/02/12 @ 4:56 PM | Permalink
By Jeff Stensland, stenslan@mailbox.sc.edu, 803-777-3686

USC neuro-science reveals brain differences between Republicans and Democrats

With the U.S. presidential election just days away, new research from the University of South Carolina provides fresh evidence that choosing a candidate may depend more on our biological make-up than a careful analysis of issues.

That’s because the brains of self-identified Democrats and Republicans are hard-wired differently and may be naturally inclined to hold varying, if not opposing, perceptions and values. The USC study, which analyzed MRI scans of 24 USC students, builds on existing research in the emerging field of political neuroscience.

“The differences are significant and real,” said lead researcher Roger D. Newman-Norlund, an assistant professor of exercise science in the Arnold School of Public Health and the director of USC’s new Brain Simulation Laboratory.

The study focused on the mirror neuron system, a network of brain areas linked to a host of social and emotional abilities. After declaring their political affiliation, The subjects were given questionnaires designed to gauge their attitudes on a range of select political issues. Next, they were given “resting state” MRIs which made it possible to analyze the strength of connections within the mirror neuron system in both the left and right hemispheres of their brains; specifically the inferior frontal gyrus, supramarginal gyrus and angular gyrus.

The results found more neural activity in areas believed to be linked with broad social connectedness in Democrats (friends, the world at-large) and more activity in areas linked with tight social connectedness in the Republicans (family, country). In some ways the study confirms a stereotype about members of the two parties -- Democrats tend to be more global and Republicans more America-centric -- but it actually runs counter to other recent research indicating Democrats enjoyed a virtual lock on caring for others.

“The results were a little surprising,” Newman-Norlund said. “This shows the picture is more complicated. One possible explanation for our results is that Democrats and Republicans process social connectedness in a fudamentally different manner."

While political neuroscience and study is still largely in its infancy, the implications for future races could be big as politicians and campaign strategists learn how to exploit brain differences to make more effective, biologically targeted appeals to voters.

The research also suggests that maintaining an open mind about political issues may be easier said than done. In fact, bridging partisan divides and acting contrary to ideological preferences likely requires going against deeply ingrained biological tendencies. And while there is evidence that mirror neuron connections can change over time, it’s not something that happens overnight, Newman-Norlund said.

“The (brain) differences could be a result of genetics, experiences, or a combination of both,” he said. “It takes a lot of effort to see the other side and we’re not going to wake up one day and all start getting along.”

Understanding the differences and their origins, however, is a step in the right direction, he said.

http://www.sc.edu/news/newsarticle.p...7#.UZVsecr_hkY

BucEyedPea 05-16-2013 05:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LiveSteam (Post 9687570)
Tang & Cash video

Hmmm, Rambo looks good in a suit too! Now, I'll have to rent it.

listopencil 05-16-2013 05:38 PM

Public release date: 13-Feb-2013
Contact: Esther White
pressoffice@exeter.ac.uk
44-139-272-2307
University of Exeter
The party in your brain

A team of political scientists and neuroscientists has shown that liberals and conservatives use different parts of the brain when they make risky decisions, and these regions can be used to predict which political party a person prefers. The new study suggests that while genetics or parental influence may play a significant role, being a Republican or Democrat changes how the brain functions.

Dr. Darren Schreiber, a researcher in neuropolitics at the University of Exeter, has been working in collaboration with colleagues at the University of California, San Diego on research that explores the differences in the way the brain functions in American liberals and conservatives. The findings are published in the journal PLOS ONE on 13 February.

In a prior experiment, participants had their brain activity measured as they played a simple gambling game. Dr. Schreiber and his UC San Diego collaborators were able to look up the political party registration of the participants in public records. Using this new analysis of 82 people who performed the gambling task, the academics showed that Republicans and Democrats do not differ in the risks they take. However, there were striking differences in the participants' brain activity during the risk-taking task.

Democrats showed significantly greater activity in the left insula, a region associated with social and self-awareness. Meanwhile Republicans showed significantly greater activity in the right amygdala, a region involved in the body's fight-or-flight system. These results suggest that liberals and conservatives engage different cognitive processes when they think about risk.

In fact, brain activity in these two regions alone can be used to predict whether a person is a Democrat or Republican with 82.9% accuracy. By comparison, the longstanding traditional model in political science, which uses the party affiliation of a person's mother and father to predict the child's affiliation, is only accurate about 69.5% of the time. And another model based on the differences in brain structure distinguishes liberals from conservatives with only 71.6% accuracy.

The model also outperforms models based on differences in genes. Dr. Schreiber said: "Although genetics have been shown to contribute to differences in political ideology and strength of party politics, the portion of variation in political affiliation explained by activity in the amygdala and insula is significantly larger, suggesting that affiliating with a political party and engaging in a partisan environment may alter the brain, above and beyond the effect of heredity."

These results may pave the way for new research on voter behaviour, yielding better understanding of the differences in how liberals and conservatives think. According to Dr. Schreiber: "The ability to accurately predict party politics using only brain activity while gambling suggests that investigating basic neural differences between voters may provide us with more powerful insights than the traditional tools of political science."

Copyright 2013 by AAAS, the science society.

http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releas...-tpi021113.php

LiveSteam 05-16-2013 05:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BucEyedPea (Post 9687584)
Hmmm, Rambo looks good in a suit too! Now, I'll have to rent it.

I walked out. Stallone sucks.

Rain Man 05-16-2013 05:46 PM

Arnold Schwarzenegger must be a fascist.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:45 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.