Andrew Luck sacked 6 times today; that's 31 through 8 games. On pace for 62.
 

Luck is going to die 62 in one season wow.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Andrew Luck sacked 6 times today; that&#39;s 31 through 8 games.<br><br>On pace for 62. Sixty-two.</p>&mdash; Zak Keefer (@zkeefer) <a href="https://twitter.com/zkeefer/status/792827676314644480">October 30, 2016</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Sucks to be him?

That sucks.

Player Sk Year
David Carr (23) 76 2002
Randall Cunningham (23) 72 1986
David Carr (26) 68 2005
Jon Kitna (33) 63 2006


So he would take the top 5 spot you can see how the texans ruined Carr man 76 sacks in one year wow.

As soon as I saw the thread title, I thought about David Carr.

if luck keeps getting sacked like this every season his name will be mentioned with Carr has wasted potential.

I have said this time and time again.

David Carr never learned to read a defense, locked on to his primary target, and held the ball far too long.

The Texans line wasn't good, but he was every bit as responsible for those sacks as those guys.

He took 44 sacks in his last season as a starter.
The following season, with Jordan Black as the only upgrade, that same line gave up 22 sacks.

Andrew Luck isn't nearly as bad at reads as Carr, but there is no question that he also holds the ball far too long, and bears as much responsibility for those sack numbers as his line.

If a QB is getting sacked 40 plus times, it isn't just the line's fault.

Yeah no. Luck has already had a solid career under his belt, already considered one of the elite signal callers in the league. He's about as far from David Carr as you can get. He's actually about as far along now in games played as Carr had for his entire career.

FYP

****ed up my post, maybe. He's not overrated at all in my opinion. He's Aaron Rodgers without the four years to develop on the sidelines. So we get to see all his growing pains from day one.

He isn't elite, right now.

Saying that he is elite, today, is overrating him.

He can still grow into that elite status, but he ain't there yet

Sucks for Luck.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Can't believe there are analysts who think he is in MVP contention. The guy is above average at best. So much hype since he joined the league meanwhile Russell Wilson is already elite.

Still better than Foles.

hasn't looked it this season.