NFL considering player ejections for dangerous hits
The NFL Competition Committee will have a busy agenda next week when it meets in Phoenix for the Annual League Meeting, according to NFL vice president Troy Vincent. One provision the group is exploring in particular could have a profound impact on games this coming year.
The Committee is also exploring ways — including considering immediate ejections or suspensions — to take dangerous hits out of our game We'll communicate this to our coaches and players with video examples of flagrant hits that may result in ejection or suspension The development comes on the heels of last year's provision, which implemented an automatic ejection system for players who committed two personal fouls in the same game. It mirrors the controversial, if effective rule that granted NCAA officials similar power. The NCAA agreed at the beginning of the month to uphold their version of the targeting rule for the 2017 season. "The change we have witnessed in player behavior has been significantly positive," NCAA rules committee chair Bob Nielson said in a release. "The adjustment made last year to allow the replay official to examine all aspects of the targeting rule was a positive change." Other items for discussion include the development of an "educational training video for players to show clear examples of appropriate and inappropriate celebrations." Referees battled criticism this past season for what critics called an uneven interpretation of what celebrations constitute taunting and which were excessive. |
The idea has been tossed out here before that if someone goes out on a flagged hit, that the offending player needs to sit the same time.
|
I wonder how the refs will determine what is dangerous?
Laying a fingernail on Tom Brady = Dangerous Blasting Alex Smith's head into the turf = Not Dangerous |
Quote:
|
yay, more subjectivity.
that's been working swimmingly on holding and DPI calls. |
They do this in college football and honestly it's a disaster.
|
I'm sure the definition of "Dangerous" will be crystal clear.
|
Quote:
Targeting rules will be uncomfortable. But they're needed more than ever. Buehlers idea makes the most sense. If you knock a player out with an illegal hit, you should sit out an equal number of snaps. |
I say implement a penalty box for the NFL. Dangerous hit, in the box for X number of plays for that unit, either D or O. Other team gets a "power play" (11 vs. 10) until they either score or the number of plays a penalized player is out.
|
Quote:
"Of potential harm to Tom Brady or someone he cares about." "Any contact that may impact near-term television ratings and jersey sales." |
The league can't even agree on what a catch is anymore.
|
The march towards irrelevance continues
|
If they did that (hopefully they won't), it would need to be reviewed first to make sure that there really was contact to the head.
There have been way too many flags thrown for a receiver who was hit helmet to helmet, and then the replay afterward shows it was shoulder to shoulder, or the contact between helmets was incidental to the actual collision. And there are more situations where the contact was unavoidable. Since the NFL just desires to slow down games and create more situations where nobody knows what the rules are, I'm certain this will go over like a fart in a spacesuit |
Quote:
|
About damn time. Always thought the yellow card/red card deal in soccer was a good idea. Fines won't stop these guys from killing each other but if a star player has to sit, the whole team will suffer.
That'll stop it right quick. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:10 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.