Originally Posted by RNR
You choose the number schoolboy. You keep campaigning for companies to pay wages that afford a comfortable living to people who perfom mindless tasks. You put the responsibility on the company instead of the person. Why in the world should a company have to provide that type of wage to a person who can be replaced by the next person that goes through the drive through at McDonald's?
I said 50,000?
Stop lying. You don't have an argument.
Why should the government have to subsidize employee pay?
Why should a job, where you work 40 hours a week, not qualify you for the basic needs of survival?