Originally Posted by BucEyedPea
You omit much because you are spinning what I said. I am talking about starting a war on a nation because they decide to arm themselves while it is being surrounded by a superpower with bases on its border and who invaded a neighbor, who has MEK inside its country committing terrorists acts in order to agitate and foment another overthrow of their govt. Furthermore, our treasure and blood is to be used for two other nations--not for our own defense. The Soviet Union armed themselves to a much greater degree and we did not bomb them either.
Other than that, this is just your opinion. A NC opinion.
I'm not omitting what you said, I'm responding to one specific portion of it. I'm not responding to the rest of it so I don't mention it.
We can disagree about whether or not a particular military action is in the national interest, but you don't get to pose on the high ground of limited government conservatism just because you oppose that particular action.
“[Cruz] might not be the most fun to have a drink at the bar with, but America needs a designated driver.” - Mica Mosbacher, wife of the late Robert Mosbacher, Secretary of Commerce