Originally Posted by Chris616
See , this is what I dont get .... think about it NeoCons are only a label for one aspect of the War Industry and political Zionism has its tools in every aspect within the various dualities . The bottom line for me , and it is really very obvious from where I see things is that the Liberal Techies who built up the Silicon based Empire are by far the more guilty of the bunch . And Lo and behold where do you see Concervative and Liberal meet ? Try the music scence and all the LSD/Mind altering Drug bands from the Dead to Phish onwards . Unix programmers and LSD . There were always people that on the outside are Liberal , pot smoking , sexually liberated LSD infused freaks that were critical to the foundations of what is Now high tech computer wizardry. You take a real close look at all these folks who have come along with Jobs and afterwards and what they have all done to get us to this moment in time where the NSA and Data Mining and GLobal control via machines is the game. They arent NeoCons , and NeoCons arent the ones pushing for Iran to be nuked , its the Jewish Political Zionists who run Israel. I wouldnt look towards the Neocon Goys as the really dangerous element here, its the current Administration that has fired so many military high ups .
Well,I am discussing the current rift in the GOP aka conservative movement such as men like DeMint nowadays saying this is not conservative position over at Heritage; or the Paleo-Cons, a good example being Pat Buchanan, who tend to be anti-war but definitely not in the pre-emptive aka offensive war camp. Especially when using offensive war is for progressive reasons. I liken this progressivism as the same basis for the destruction of our own state's sovereignty over the long-term.
Before you read the “Outside The Lines” report, consider this:
Taping the opposing team’s sideline still isn’t banned; only taping the opposing team from the sideline is illegal.
Also remember this:
Taping the opposing team from the sideline wasn’t banned until 2006, yet the report cites examples as far back as 2000. ~NESN