Originally Posted by KILLER_CLOWN
Scientific journal unethically decides to retract Seralini's GMO study
After Seralini's study was published, the EFSA attacked it, saying that "it does not meet acceptable scientific standards."
Despite the fact that you're using NaturalNews (
) as your source, the above quote is all that matters. It's hardly "Attack" by saying it doesn't meet acceptable scientific standards.
The study was shoddy from the start.
"There is very little scientific credibility to this paper," said Martina Newell–McGloughlin, a plant biotechnologist at the University of California, Davis. "The flaws in the test are just incredible to me. To be totally honest with you, the type of statistical analysis they used is really a type of fishing expedition. One individual referred to it as 'fantasy statistics.'"
"You never, ever design an experiment to look for specific outcomes," she added. "If you're a real scientist, based on observations you find, you put forward hypotheses about how you are getting these types of outcomes. They do none of this."