|
That's exactly why you don't go overboard to sign him. If he's looking for a Flacco contract, you walk. The Chiefs shouldn't move heaven and Earth for him, they just need to offer him a fair deal for an average to slightly above average QB. The deal needs to be one that allows them to keep the parts that are necessary for him to win the 10-12 games/season he's capable of winning with a solid defense.
If you can stick with a game manager salary for him, I believe you do get a competitive advantage. Obviously it would be better to snag someone like Wilson in the 3rd and get a Pro Bowl QB for free for a few years, but let's wait until we have one of those first. As much as we think we see, the coaches see more. If we got a guy like Wilson, I'm completely confident that Reid would see that on the practice field and wouldn't hesitate to give the kid the keys (he's done it before).
And no, we didn't manage to tie that game, but in the alternative you can say that he took a team against a $25 million quarterback that just threw 5 touchdowns and had them 3 yards away from overtime. That's pretty damn impressive in its own right, is it not?
I just think it's both unfair and unreasonable to say "if he's not Manning, don't extend him." He's not Manning - he'll never be Manning. But if your choice is Alex Smith at $10-$12 million/season or Eli Manning, Joe Flacco or Tony Romo at twice that, you're going to be a better football team on the aggregate with Alex Smith. In that sense, he absolutely provides a competitive advantage.
__________________
"If there's a god, he's laughing at us.....and our football team..."
"When you look at something through rose colored glasses, all the red flags just look like flags."
|