Quote:
Originally Posted by Pestilence
Go back and read JENKINSWINS posts on the subject. He first clarified that Smith had a better running game in SF until that was proven wrong. Then he stated that Charles's success is because of Alex Smith reading defenses.....proved wrong again.
|
That's fine... it's whatever at this point. In SF, every beatwriter was gushing about Alex's pre-snap reads and saying how it was frequently very helpful to the running production.
Whether that is true in KC, or was even true in SF... who can really say? You would literally have to break down each play while knowing the exact D-scheme and O-audibles to really know.
So again... it's whatever.. we wasted enough time on it. My comment was that it was well known (or often said) that Smith has excellent pre-snap diagnosis. I suspect this is true... and that it helps at times when JC rips off a big one after it looks like Smith changes the play. That's all.