Quote:
Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58
"Originally Posted by Rudy is a Troll
There is no definitive right or wrong, but I do not believe Sanchez was ever good because of his QB rating in 09 and 10 (stat/fact). Saying people were wrong or right in that specific time frame is silly. It's always going to be subjective. Each side had a fine argument that was presented. QB play (rating) vs. wins."
No disrespect meant, but QB rating? Seriously?
In 2009, Matt Cassel had a game with a QB Rating over 110 in a game in which he threw for under 100 yards and we lost by 20+ points.
Good game, eh?
But hey, you used stats to back up your argument!
It helps to know what those numbers mean before you just jump into a discussion, yell, "QB RATING!" and drop the mic and leave.
|
This is exactly my point earlier about everyone being forced to take a side and fight to the death. He said, quite rationally, that there is no definitive right and wrong, it's subjective, and each side had a fine argument.
Yet, you still attack his stats and force him into the "anti-Sanchez" corner with your characterization of his point.
It makes it impossible to set forth a moderate, reasoned argument. This shit is all subjective. None of it is black and white. Not every single issue has to be one side of CP against the other.
Sanchez had good games and bad games. He may have worked out better here. Maybe he would've bombed here. Based on that, which side should I be forced to join?