Quote:
Originally Posted by Wallcrawler
Football is a team sport. You cant sit and point fingers at one guy and let slide the atrocity of the performance of one of your team's units. Doesn't work that way.
Charles is very quickly approaching the top of the mountain in terms of Chiefs Franchise Running Backs. The fact that we scored 44 points without him should speak volumes of the talent level and capability of our often questioned Quarterback, given what he did and who he did that with without the threat of Jamaal Charles back there.
Shit happens. He didn't just decide 6 plays into the game to just Peace Out and leave the work to Smith and Knile Davis.
|
Good points. While you play with comic books I actually play football. I'm entitled to my opinion and I agree they scored 44 without JC. The problem is they needed 46 to get the job done.
I never pointed a finger at a single player, the entire defense ****ed that game up. My point was when we needed our playmaker he wasn't there and because of that people will always say "what if" and when you have a "what if" hanging over you it can take away some of the shine. After all that's what the thread is about.