Quote:
Originally Posted by Dartgod
OK, let me rephrase.
The employer can chose not to comply, but state laws require that they do.
|
The statutory language is treatment as may reasonably be required. Generally judges define that as whatever the doctors recommend, but that doesn't mean adjusters have to voluntarily comply.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikeyis4dcats.
true, but in the absence of WC, they must cover the employees medical costs as if it was WC.
|
Sure, but practically speaking, if an employer doesn't have WC coverage, there's a high chance of financial instability.